Factors associated with learning outcome of BSN in a blended learning environment

Contemporary Nurse

Volumn 38, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 24-34

  Hsu, Li Ling ^a   Hsieh, Suh Ing ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Ethical course; Face to face; Nursing education; Nursing student

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959720709     PISSN: 10376178     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/conu.2011.38.1-2.24     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abowd G, da Graca PM, Kerimbaev B, Ishiguro Y and Guzdial M (1999) Anchoring discussions in lecture: An approach to collaboratively extending classroom digital media. Paper: Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Palo Alto, California.
2. Aiken RL (2000) Psychological testing and assessment, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA
3. Ajzen I and Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
4. Allmark P (2005) Can the study of ethics enhance nursing practice? Journal of Advanced Nursing 51: 618-624
5. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2008) Essentials of a baccalaureate education for nursing practice, AACN, Washington, DC
6. Ammouri AA and Neuberger G (2008) The perception of risk of heart disease scale: development and psychometric analysis, Journal of Nursing Measurement 16(2): 83-97
7. Bartlett JE, Kotrlik JW and Higgins CC (2001) Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research, Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal 19(1): 43-50
8. Berge ZL (2000) Designing discussion questions for online, adult learning, Educational Technology 40(5): 53-56
9. Blankson J and Kyei-Blankson L (2008) Nontraditional students' perception of a blended course: Integrating synchronous online discussion and face-to-face instruction, Journal of Interactive Learning Research 19(3): 421-438
10. Brown AH and Green T (2009) Time students spend reading threaded discussions in online graduate courses requiring asynchronous participation, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 10(6): 51-64
11. Casterle BD, Grypdonck M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M and Janssen PJ (1997) Nursing students' responses to ethical dilemmas in nursing practice, Nursing Ethics 4(1): 12-28
12. Choi I, Land SM and Turgeon AJ (2005) Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion, Instructional Science 33(5-6): 483-511
13. Colesca SE, Dobrica L and Alpopi C (2009) Students outcomes and perceptions in a blended learning format, Metalurgia International 8: 222-229
14. Contreras LC (2004) Predicting computer self-confidence from demographic and personality variables, Quarterly Review of Distance Education 5(3):173-181
15. Davis A, Tschudin V and de Raeve L (2006) Essentials of teaching and learning in nursing ethics, Churchill Livingstone-Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA
16. Dziubanm CD, Hartman J, Juge F, Moskal PD and Sorg S (2005) Blended learning: Online learning enters the mainstream, in Bonk CJ and Graham C (eds) Handbook of Blended Learning Environment: Global Perspectives, local designs, Pfeiffer Publications, San Francisco, CA
17. Eastman JK and Swift CO (2001) New horizons in distance education: The online learner-centered marketing class, Journal of Marketing Education 23: 25-35
18. Fetsco T and McClure J (2005) Educational psychology: An integrated approach to classroom decisions, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA
19. Field A (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE, London.
20. Frankola K (2001) Why online learners drop out, Workforce October: 53-60
21. Garnham C and Kaleta R (2002) Introduction to hybrid courses, Teaching with Technology Today 8(6): accessed at http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm on 14 September 2010.
22. Gorgulu RS and Dinc L (2007) Ethics in Turkish nursing education programs, Nursing Ethics 14(6): 741-752
23. Halinski RS and Feldt LS (1970) The selection of variables in multiple regression analyses, Journal of Educational Measurement 7(3): 151-158
24. Havard B, Du J and Olinzock A (2005) Deep learning: The knowledge, methods, and cognition process in instructor led online discussion, The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 6(2):125-135
25. Hermans CM, Haytko DL and Mott-Stenerson B (2009) Student satisfaction in web-enhanced learning environments, Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, accessed at http://aabri.com/manuscripts/09147.pdf on 14 July 2010.
26. Holenko M and Hoic-Bozic N (2008) Using online discussions in a blended learning course, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning 2(2): 18-23
27. Hsu LL (2010) Metacognitive Inventory for nursing students in Taiwan: Instrument development and testing, Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(11): 2573-2581
28. Ireland J, Martindale S, Johnson N, Adams D, Eboh W and Mowatt E (2009) Blended learning in education: effects on knowledge and attitude, British Journal of Nursing 18(2): 124-130
29. Itzkan SJ (1994) Assessing the future of telecomputing environments: Implications for instruction and administration, The Computer Teacher 22(4): 60-64
30. Ketefian S (1999) Legal and ethical issues: Ethics content in nursing education, Journal of Professional Nursing 15(3):138
31. Kline P (1993) The Handbook of Psychological Test Construction. Routledge, London.
32. LaRose R, Gregg J and Eastin M (1998) Audiographic telecourses for the web: An experiment, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 4: accessed at http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue2/larose.html on 1 September 2010.
33. Lim DH and Morris ML (2009) Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment, Educational Technology & Society 12(4): 282-293
34. Miller DE and Kunce JT (1973) Prediction and statistical overkill revisited, Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance 6(3): 157-163
35. Nolan Pw and Markert D (2002) Ethical reasoning observed: A longitudinal study of nursing students, Nursing Ethics 9(3):243-258
36. Online Learning Department (2005) Blended learning pilot project - Final report for the academic 2004-2005, accessed at https://ritdml.rit.edu/bitstream/handle/1850/276/BL%20Pilot%20Final%20Report%2003-04.pdf?sequence=1.pdf on 6 August 2010.
37. Parsons S, Barker PJ and Armstrong AE (2001) The teaching of health care ethics to students of nursing in the UK: A pilot study, Nursing Ethics 8(1): 45-55
38. Rohlf FH and Bertocci RJ (2005) Pedagogy for medical ethics in practice: A reasonable approach for health care practitioners, Perspective on Physician Assistant Education 16(1): 37-40
39. Scardamalia M and Bereiter C (1996) Adaptation and understanding: A case for new cultures of schooling, in Vosniadou S, DeCorte E, Glaser R and Mandl H (eds) International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments, pp. 149-163, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
40. Schraw G and Dennison RS (1994) Assessing metacognitive awareness, Contemporary Educational Psychology 19: 460-475
41. Sigler EA and Tallent-Runnels MK (2006) Examining the validity of scores from an instrument designed to measure metacognition of problem solving, The Journal of General Psychology 133: 257-276
42. Stansfield MH, McLellan E and Connolly TM (2004) Enhancing student performance in online learning and traditional face-to-face class delivery, Journal of Information Technology Education 3: 173-188
43. Swanson HL (1992) The relationship between metacognition and problem solving in gifted children, Roeper Review 15(1): 43-48
44. Troha FJ (2002) Bulletproof instructional design: A model for blended learning, A Refereed Journal of the United States Distance Learning Association 16(5): accessed at http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/MAY02_ Issue/article03. html on 5 June 2010.
45. Turner SL and Bechtel GA (1998) The effectiveness of guided design on ethical decision making and moral reasoning among community nursing students, Nursing Connections 11: 69-74
46. Twigg CA (2003) New models for online learning: improving learning and reducing costs, EDUCAUSE review 38(5): 28-38, Accessed at http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0352.pdf on 14 September 2010.
47. Vukman KB (2005) Developmental differences in metacognition and their connections with cognitive development in adulthood, Journal of Adult Development 12 (4): 211-221
48. Vonderwell S, Liang X and Alderman K (2007) Asynchronous discussion and assessment of online learning, Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39(3): 309-328
49. Warren CMJ (2008) The use of online asynchronous discussion forums in the development of deep learning among postgraduate real estate students. Paper presented at the meeting of CIB International Conference on Building Education and Research. Kandalama, Sri Lanka. 11-15.
50. Yushau B (2006) The effects of blended e-learning on mathematics and computer attitudes in pre-calculus algebra, The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast 3(2): 176-183
51. Zhao J (2008) An examination of students' perception of blended e-learning in Chinese higher education, Edutainment 2008: 162-170
52. Zimmerman BJ and Martinez-Pons M (1990) Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use, Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 52-59
53. Zulkiply N, Kabit MR and Ghani KA (2008) Metacognition: What roles does it play in students' academic performance, The International Journal of Learning 15: 97-105