Teaching and research nexuses across faculty career stage, ability and affiliated discipline in a South Korean research university

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 485-503

  Shin, Jung Cheol ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Career stage; Division of labor; Research productivity; Teaching and research relationship; Teaching quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959486609     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075071003759052     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Baek, S., and H. Shin. 2008. Multilevel analysis of the effects of student and course characteristics on satisfaction in undergraduate liberal arts courses. Asia Pacific Education Review 9, no. 4: 475-486.
2. Baldwin, R.G., C.J. Lunceford, and K.E. Vanderlinden. 2005. Faculty in the middle years: Illuminating an overlooked phase of academic life. Review of Higher Education 29, no. 1: 97-118.
3. Barnes, L.L.B., and M.W. Barnes. 1993. Academic discipline and generalizability of student evaluations of instruction. Research in Higher Education 34, no. 2: 135-149.
4. Bayer, A.E., and J.E. Dutton. 1977. Career age and research-professional activities of academic scientists: Tests of alternative nonlinear models and some implications for higher education faculty policies. Journal of Higher Education 48, no. 3: 259-282.
5. Becher, T., and P.R. Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: Open University Press.
6. Bellas, M.L., and R.K. Toutkoushian. 1999. Faculty time allocation and research productivity: Gender, race, and family effects. Review of Higher Education 22, no. 4: 367-390.
7. Biglan, A. 1973. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57, no. 3: 195-203.
8. Blackburn, R.T., and J.H. Lawrence. 1986. Aging and the quality of faculty job performance. Review of Educational Research 23, no. 3: 265-290.
9. Blackmore, J. 2009. Academic pedagogies, quality logics and performative universities: Evaluating teaching and what students want. Studies in Higher Education 34, no. 8: 857-872.
10. Bonaccorsi, A., and C. Daraio. 2003. Age effects in scientific productivity: The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR). Scientometrics 58, no. 1: 49-90.
11. Bordons, M., M.A. Zulueta, F. Remero, and S. Barrigon. 1999. Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: The effects of the multidisciplinary research programme. Scientometrics 46, no. 3: 383-398.
12. Boyer, E.L. 1990. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
13. Braxton, J.M., and L.L. Hargens. 1996. Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, ed. J.C. Smart, vol. 11. New York: Agathon Press.
14. Braxton, J.M., W. Luckey, and P. Helland. 2002. Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship into colleges and universities through Boyer's four domains. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, vol. 29, no. 2. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Brew, A. 1999. Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context. Studies in Higher Education 24, no. 3: 291-301.
16. Brew, A., and D. Boud. 1995. Teaching and research: Establishing the vital link with learning. Higher Education 29: 261-273.
17. Brown, R.B., and S. McCartney. 1998. The link between research and teaching: Its purpose and implications. Innovations in Education and Training International 35, no. 2: 117-129.
18. Cabrera, A.F., C.L. Colbeck, and P.T. Terenzini. 2001. Developing performance indicators for assessing classroom teaching practices and student learning: The case of engineering. Research in Higher Education 42, no. 3: 327-352.
19. Centra, J.A. 1983. Research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Research in Higher Education 18, no. 2: 379-389.
20. Coate, K., R. Barnett, and G. Williams. 2001. Relationships between teaching and research in higher education in England. Higher Education Quarterly 55, no. 2: 158-174.
21. Cohen, P.A. 1981. Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Education Research 51: 281-309.
22. Colbeck, C.C. 1998. Merging in a seamless blend: How faculty integrate teaching and research. Journal of Higher Education 69: 647-671.
23. Deem, R., and L. Lucas. 2007. Research and teaching cultures in two contrasting UK policy contexts: Academic life in education departments in five English and Scottish universities. Higher Education 54: 115-133.
24. Dundar, H., and D.R. Lewis. 1998. Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education 39, no. 6: 607-631.
25. Durning, B., and A. Jenkins. 2005. Teaching/research relationships in departments: The perspective of built environment academics. Studies in Higher Education 30, no. 4: 407-426.
26. Elton, L. 2001. Research and teaching: Conditions for a positive link. Teaching in Higher Education 6, no. 1: 43-56.
27. Fairweather, J.S. 2002. The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. Journal of Higher Education 73, no. 1: 26-48.
28. Feldman, K.A. 1987. Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education 26, no. 3: 227-298.
29. Feldman, K.A. 1989. Association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies. Research in Higher Education 30: 583-645.
30. Friedrich, R.J., and S.J. Michalak Jr. 1983. Why doesn't research improve teaching? Some answers from a small liberal arts college. Journal of Higher Education 54, no. 2: 145-163.
31. Griffiths, R. 2004. Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education 29, no. 6: 709-726.
32. Halse, C., E. Deane, J. Hobson, and G. Jones. 2007. The research-teaching nexus: What do national teaching awards tell us? Studies in Higher Education 32, no. 6: 727-746.
33. Hativa, N., and M. Birenbaum. 2000. Who prefers what? Disciplinary differences in students' preferred approaches to teaching and learning styles. Research in Higher Education 41, no. 2: 209-236.
34. Hattie, J., and H.W. Marsh. 1996. The relationship between research and teaching: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research 66, no. 4: 507-542.
35. Healey, M. 2005. Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching, ed. R. Barnett, 183-210. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
36. Jenkins, A. 2000. The relationship between teaching and research: Where does geography stand and deliver? Journal of Geography in Higher Education 24, no. 3: 325-351.
37. Johnes, G. 1988. Research performance indications in the university sector. Higher Education Quarterly 42, no. 1: 54-71.
38. Katz, J.S., and B.R. Martin. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26, no. 1: 1-18.
39. Kim, K., and Y. Woo. 2009. Isn't it a pyrrhic victory? Over privatization and universal access in tertiary education in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review 10, no. 1: 125-137.
40. Kreber, C., and H. Castleden. 2009. Reflection on teaching and epistemological structure: Reflective and critically reflective processes in 'pure/soft' and 'pure/hard' fields. Higher Education 57: 509-531.
41. Lee, S., and B. Bozeman. 2005. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science 35, no. 5: 673-702.
42. Leistyte, L., J. Enders, and H. Boer. 2009. The balance between teaching and research in Dutch and English universities in the context of university governance reforms. Higher Education 57, no. 4: 509-531.
43. Levin, S.G., and P.E. Stephan. 2001. Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. American Economic Review 81, no. 1: 114-132.
44. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., K. Trigwell, A. Nevgi, and P. Ashwin. 2006. How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education 31, no. 3: 285-298.
45. Marsh, H.W. 1987. Students' evaluations of teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 707-754.
46. Marsh, H.W. 1991. Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structures. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 285-296.
47. Marsh, H.W. 2007. Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective, ed. R.P. Perry and J.C. Smart, 319-384. New York: Springer.
48. Marsh, H.W., and J. Hattie. 2002. The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? Journal of Higher Education 73, no. 5: 603-641.
49. Moses, I. 1990. Teaching, research and scholarship in different disciplines. Higher Education 19: 351-375.
50. Muis, K.R., L.D. Bendixen, and F.C. Haerle. 2006. Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review 18: 3-54.
51. Neumann, R. 1992. Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: A framework for analysis. Higher Education 23, no. 2: 159-171.
52. Neumann, R. 1996. Researching the teaching-research nexus: A critical review. Australian Journal of Education 40, no. 19: 5-18.
53. Noser, T.D.C., H. Manakyan, and J.R. Tanner. 1996. Research productivity and perceived teaching effectiveness: A study of Economics faculty. Research in Higher Education 37, no. 3: 299-321.
54. O'Meara, K. 2005. Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship in faculty reward systems: Does it make a difference? Research in Higher Education 46, no. 5: 479-510.
55. Pike, G.R., and T. Killian. 2001. Reported gains in student learning: Do academic disciplines make a difference? Research in Higher Education 42, no. 4: 429-454.
56. Porter, S.R., and P.D. Umbach. 2001. Analyzing faculty workload data using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education 42, no. 2: 171-196.
57. Ramsden, P., and I. Moses. 1992. Associations between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education 23: 273-295.
58. Renaud, R.D., and H G. Murray. 2005. Factorial validity of student ratings of instruction. Research in Higher Education 46, no. 8: 929-953.
59. Robertson, J. 2007. Beyond the 'research/teaching nexus': Exploring the complexity of academic experience. Studies in Higher Education 32, no. 5: 541-556.
60. Robertson, J., and C. Bond. 2005. The research/teaching relation: A view from the 'edge'. Higher Education 50: 509-535.
61. Sax, L.J., L.S. Hagedorn, M. Arredondo, and F.A. Dicrisi III. 2002. Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education 43, no. 4: 423-446.
62. Schimank, U., and M. Winnes. 2000. Beyond Humboldt? The relationship between teaching and research in European university systems. Science & Public Policy 27, no. 6: 397-408.
63. Serow, R.C. 2000. Research and teaching at a research university. Higher Education 40, no. 4: 449-463.
64. Shin, J.C. 2009. Building world-class research university: The Brain Korea 21 project. Higher Education 58, no. 5: 669-688.
65. Shin, J., and W. Cummings. 2010. Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: Research preference, collaboration, and time on research. Scientometrics 85, no. 2: 581-594.
66. Shin, J., and G. Harman. 2009. New challenges for higher education: Global and Asia-Pacific perspectives. Asia Pacific Education Review 10, no. 1: 1-13.
67. Simons, M., and J. Elen. 2007. The 'research-teaching nexus' and 'education through research': An exploration of ambivalences. Studies in Higher Education 32, no. 5: 617-631.
68. Smeby, J.C. 1998. Knowledge production and knowledge transmission: The interaction between research and teaching at universities. Teaching in Higher Education 3, no. 1: 5-20.
69. Smeby, J.C., and S. Try. 2005. Departmental contexts and faculty research activity in Norway. Research in Higher Education 46, no. 6: 593-619.
70. Tien, F.F. 2007. Faculty research behavior and career incentives: The case of Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development 27: 4-17.
71. Tien, F.F., and R.T. Blackburn. 1996. Faculty rank system, research motivation, and faculty research productivity: Measure refinement and theory testing. Journal of Higher Education 67: no. 1: 2-22.
72. Trigwell, K. 2005. Teaching-research relations, cross-disciplinary collegiality and student learning. Higher Education 49: 235-254.
73. Trigwell, K., and S. Shale. 2004. Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Studies in Higher Education 29, no. 4: 523-536.