Complex deleterious interactions associated with malic enzyme may contribute to reproductive isolation in the copepod Tigriopus californicus

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  Willett, Christopher S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; MALATE DEHYDROGENASE (DECARBOXYLATING); MALATE DEHYDROGENASE (DECARBOXYLATING) 2; PROTEIN GOT2; RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; D-MALATE DEHYDROGENASE (DECARBOXYLATING); DEXTRO MALATE DEHYDROGENASE (DECARBOXYLATING); MALATE DEHYDROGENASE;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPEPOD; CROSS HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; GENE; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; GOT2 GENE; HYBRID; INTERTIDAL SPECIES; MALE; ME2 GENE; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TIGRIOPUS CALIFORNICUS; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; INHERITANCE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION;

COPEPODA; TIGRIOPUS CALIFORNICUS;

ANIMALS; ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASES; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; COPEPODA; CROSSES, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENETIC LOCI; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MALATE DEHYDROGENASE; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 79959442718     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021177     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Coyne JA, Orr HA, (2004) Speciation. Sunderland, MA Sinauer Assoc.
2. Orr HA, (1995) The population genetics of speciation: The evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139: 1805-1813.
3. Welch JJ, (2004) Accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities: Reconciling theory and data. Evolution 58: 1145-1156.
4. Cabot EL, Davis AW, Johnson NA, Wu CI, (1994) Genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: Complex epistasis underlying hybrid male sterility. Genetics 137: 175-189.
5. Davis AW, Noonburg EG, Wu CI, (1994) Evidence for complex genic interactions between conspecific chromosomes underlying hybrid female sterility in the Drosophila simulans clade. Genetics 137: 191-199.
6. Maside XR, Barral JP, Naveira F, (1998) Hidden effects of X chromosome introgressions on spermatogenesis in Drosophila simulans X D. mauritiana hybrids unveiled by interactions among minor genetic factors. Genetics 150: 745-754.
7. Moyle LC, Nakazato T, (2009) Complex epistasis for Dobzhansky-Muller hybrid incompatibility in Solanum. Genetics 181: 347-351.
8. Orr HA, Irving S, (2001) Complex epistasis and the genetic basis of hybrid sterility in the Drosophila pseudoobscura Bogota-USA hybridization. Genetics 158: 1089-1100.
9. Perez DE, Wu CI, (1995) Further characterization of the Odysseus locus of hybrid sterility in Drosophila: One gene is not enough. Genetics 140: 201-206.
10. Kondrashov AS, (2003) Accumulation of Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities within a spatially structured population. Evolution 57: 151-153.
11. Presgraves DC, (2010) The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nature Reviews Genetics 11: 175-180.
12. Johnson NA, (2010) Hybrid incompatibility genes: remnants of a genomic battlefield? Trends in Genetics 26: 317-325.
13. Brideau NJ, Flores HA, Wang J, Maheshwari S, Wang X, et al. (2006) Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 314: 1292-1295.
14. Tang SW, Presgraves DC, (2009) Evolution of the Drosophila nuclear pore complex results in multiple hybrid incompatibilities. Science 323: 779-782.
15. Phadnis N, Orr HA, (2009) A single gene causes both male sterility and segregation disortion in Drosophila hybrids. Science 323: 376-379.
16. Burton RS, (1997) Genetic evidence for long term persistence of marine invertebrate populations in an ephemeral environment. Evolution 51: 993-998.
17. Willett CS, Ladner JT, (2009) Investigations of fine-scale phylogeography in Tigriopus californicus reveal historical patterns of population divergence. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 139.
18. Burton RS, (1998) Intraspecific phylogeography across the Point Conception biogeographic boundary. Evolution 52: 734-745.
19. Edmands S, (2001) Phylogeography of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus reveals substantially reduced population differentiation at northern latitudes. Molecular Ecology 10: 1743-1750.
20. Willett CS, (2004) Evolution of interacting proteins in the mitochondrial electron transport system in a marine copepod. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 443-453.
21. Ganz HH, Burton RS, (1995) Genetic differentiation and reproductive incompatibility among Baja California populations of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Marine Biology 123: 821-827.
22. Palmer CA, Edmands S, (2000) Mate choice in the face of both inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Marine Biology 136: 693-698.
23. Burton RS, (1987) Differentiation and integration of the genome in populations of Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 41: 504-513.
24. Edmands S, (1999) Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53: 1757-1768.
25. Willett CS, (2008) No evidence for faster male hybrid sterility in population crosses of an intertidal copepod (Tigriopus californicus). Genetica 133: 129-136.
26. Edmands S, Northrup SL, Hwang AS, (2009) Maladapted gene complexes within populations of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californius? Evolution 63: 2184-2192.
27. Harrison JS, Edmands S, (2006) Chromosomal basis of viability differences in Tigriopus californicus interpopulation hybrids. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 2040-2051.
28. Willett CS, Berkowitz JN, (2007) Viability effects and not meoitic drive cause dramatic departures from Mendelian inheritance for malic enzyme in hybrids of Tigriopus californicus populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 1196-1205.
29. Hoelzel AR, Green A, (1992) Analysis of Population-Level Variation by Sequencing PCR-Amplified DNA. In: Hoelzel AR, editors. Practical Approach Series: Molecular Genetic Analysis Of Populations New York, New York Oxford University Press pp. 159-187.
30. Claros MG, Vincens P, (1996) Computational method to predict mitochondrially imported proteins and their targeting sequences. European Journal of Biochemistry 241: 779-786.
31. Librado P, Rozas J, (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451-1452.
32. Yang ZH, (2007) PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1586-1591.
33. Burton RS, (1985) Mating system of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Marine Biology 86: 247-252.
34. Willett CS, (2010) Potential fitness tradeoffs for thermal tolerance in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 64: 2521-2534.
35. Willett CS, (2006) Deleterious epistatic interactions between electron transport system protein-coding loci in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Genetics 173: 1465-1477.
36. Willett CS, Burton RS, (2001) Viability of cytochrome C genotypes depends on cytoplasmic backgrounds in Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 55: 1592-1599.
37. Neff MM, Turk E, Kalishman M, (2002) Web-based primer design for single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Trends in Genetics 18: 613-615.
38. Willett CS, (2008) Significant variation for fitness impacts of ETS loci in hybrids between populations of Tigriopus californicus. Journal of Heredity 99: 56-65.
39. Haldane JBS, (1956) The estimation of viabilities. J Genet 59: 29-36.
40. Dill MM, Burton RS, (1984) Genetics of mitochondrial glutamate-oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT-2) in Tigriopus californicus. Biochemical Genetics 22: 339-347.
41. McDonald JH, Kreitman M, (1991) Adaptive Protein Evolution at the Adh Locus in Drosophila. Nature 351: 652-654.
42. Willett CS, (2011) The nature of interactions that contribute to postzygotic reproductive isolation in hybrid copepods. Genetica DOI 10.1007/s10709-010-9525-1.
43. Willett CS, Burton RS, (2003) Environmental influences on epistatic interactions: Viabilities of cytochrome c genotypes in interpopulation crosses. Evolution 57: 2286-2292.
44. Bordenstein SR, Drapeau MD, (2001) Genotype-by-environment interaction and the Dobzhansky-Muller model of postzygotic isolation. J Evol Biol 14: 490-501.
45. Barbash DA, Roote J, Ashburner M, (2000) The Drosophila melanogaster hybrid male rescue gene causes inviability in male and female species hybrids. Genetics 154: 1747-1771.
46. Coyne JA, Simeonidis S, Rooney P, (1998) Relative paucity of genes causing inviability in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics 150: 1091-1103.
47. Demuth JP, Wade MJ, (2007) Population differentiation in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. I. Genetic architecture. Evolution 61: 494-509.
48. Wade MJ, Johnson NA, Toquenaga Y, (1999) Temperature effects and genotype-by-environment interactions in hybrids: Haldane's rule in flour beetles. Evolution 53: 855-865.
49. Edmands S, Deimler JK, (2004) Local adaptation, intrinsic coadaptation and the effects of environmental stress on interpopulation hybrids in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 303: 183-196.
50. Davis AW, Wu C-I, (1996) The broom of the sorcerer's apprentice: the fine structure of a chromosomal region causing reproductive isolation between two sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics 143: 1287-1298.
51. Chang AS, Bennett SM, Noor MAF, (2010) Epistasis among Drosophila persimilis Factors Conferring Hybrid Male Sterility with D-pseudoobscura bogotana. PLoS ONE 5.
52. Tajima F, (1989) Statistical methods for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
53. Fu YX, Li WH, (1993) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133: 693-709.
54. Fay JC, Wu CI, (2000) Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics 155: 1405-1413.