Sexual selection and temporal phenotypic variation in a damselfly population

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1517-1532

  Steele, D B ^b   Siepielski, A M ^a   Mcpeek, M A ^a  

^a Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory   (United States)

^b River Valley Community College   (United States)

Author keywords

Directional selection; Mating success; Odonata; Sexual selection; Stabilizing selection

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; DAMSELFLY; MATING SUCCESS; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SEXUAL SELECTION; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; INSECT; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; TIME;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; INSECTS; MALE; SELECTION, GENETIC; TIME FACTORS;

ENALLAGMA ASPERSUM; ODONATA; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 79959328756     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02284.x     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Anholt, B.R. 1990. An experimental separation of interference and exploitative competition in a larval damselfly. Ecology 71: 1483-1493.
3. Anholt, B.R. 1991. Measurements of selection on a population of damselflies with a manipulated phenotype. Evolution 45: 1091-1106.
4. Anholt, B.R. 1992. Sex and habitat differences in feeding by adult Enallagma boreale (Zygoptera, Coenagrionidae). Oikos 65: 428-432.
5. Arnold, S.J. & Wade, M.J. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38: 709-719.
6. Atkinson, D. 1994. Temperature and organism size-a biological law for ectotherms? Adv. Ecol. Res. 25: 1-54.
7. Banks, M.J. & Thompson, D.J. 1985. Lifetime mating success in the damselfly Coenagrion puella. Anim. Behav. 33: 1175-1183.
8. Bell, G. 2010. Fluctuating selection: the perpetual renewal of adaptation in variable environments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 36: 87-97.
9. Bick, G.H. & Hornuff, L.E. 1966. Reproductive behavior in the damselflies Enallagma aspersum (Hagen) and Enallagma exsulans (Hagen). Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 68: 78-85.
10. Bleakley, B.H., Wolf, J.B. & Moore, A.J. 2010. Evolutionary quantitative genetics of social behaviour. In: Social Behaviour: Genes, Ecology and Evolution (T. Székely, J. Komdeur & A.J. Moore, eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Bulmer, M.G. 1980. The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
12. Calsbeek, R. & Cox, R.M. 2010. Experimentally assessing the relative importance of predation and competition as agents of selection. Nature 465: 613-616.
13. Calsbeek, R., Beurmann, W. & Smith, T.B. 2009. Parallel shifts in ecology and natural selection. BMC Evol. Biol. 9: 3.
14. Chaine, A.S. & Lyon, B.E. 2008. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Science 319: 459-462.
15. Charmantier, A., McCleery, R.H., Cole, L., Perrins, C.M., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Sheldon, B.C. 2008. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population. Science 320: 800-803.
16. Corbet, P.S. 1999. Dragonflies: Behaviour and Ecology of Odonata. Harley Books, UK.
17. Cordero, A. 1995. Correlates of male mating success in two natural populations of the damselfly Ischnura graellsii (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Ecol. Entomol. 20: 213-222.
18. De Block, M. & Stoks, R. 2005. Fitness effects from egg to reproduction: bridging the life history transition. Ecology 86: 185-197.
19. Draper, N.R. & Smith, H. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
20. Endler, J.A. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
21. Estes, S. & Arnold, S.J. 2007. Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales. Am. Nat. 1692: 227-244.
22. Fincke, O.M. 1982. Lifetime mating success in a natural population of the damselfly Enallagma hageni Walsh (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10: 293-302.
23. Fincke, O.M. 1984. Sperm competition in the damselfly Enallagma hageni: benefits of multiple mating for males and females. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 235-240.
24. Fincke, O.M. 1986. Lifetime reproductive success and the opportunity for selection in a nonterritorial damselfly (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Evolution 40: 791-803.
25. Fincke, O.M. & Hadrys, H. 2001. Unpredictable offspring survivorship in the damselfly Megaloprepus coerulatus shapes parental strategies, constrains sexual selection, and challenges traditional fitness estimates. Evolution 55: 653-664.
26. Ghalambor, C.K., McKay, J.K., Carroll, S. & Reznick, D.N. 2007. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation to new environments. Funct. Ecol. 21: 394-407.
27. Gosden, T.P. & Svensson, E.I. 2008. Spatial and temporal dynamics in a sexual selection mosaic. Evolution 624: 845-856.
28. Grant, P.R. & Grant, B.R. 2002. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science 296: 707-711.
29. Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vigneri, S.N., Hill, C.E., Hoang, A. et al. 2001. Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98: 9157-9160.
30. Hunt, J., Breuker, C.J., Sadowski, J.A. & Moore, A.J. 2009. Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 13-26.
31. Jann, P., Blanckenhorn, W.U. & Ward, P.I. 2000. Temporal and microspatial variation in the intensities of natural and sexual selection in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 927-938.
32. Janzen, F.J. & Stern, H.S. 1998. Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Evolution 52: 1564-1571.
33. Kalisz, S. 1986. Variable selection on the timing of germination in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 40: 479-491.
34. Kingsolver, J.G., Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vigniere, S.N., Hill, C.E. et al. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Amer. Natur. 157: 245-261.
35. Klug, H., Lindström, K. & Kokko, H. 2010. Who to include in measures of sexual selection is no trivial matter. Ecol. Lett. 13: 1094-1102.
36. Kokko, H., Brooks, R., McNamara, J.M. & Houston, A.I. 2002. The sexual selection continuum. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 1331-1340.
37. Kokko, H., Jennions, M.D. & Brooks, R. 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 37: 43-66.
38. Kopp, M. & Hermisson, J. 2006. Evolution of genetic architecture under frequency-dependent disruptive selection. Evolution 60: 1537-1550.
39. Kotiaho, J. & Puurtinen, M. 2007. The paradox of mate choice for indirect genetic benefits. Funct. Ecol. 21: 638-644.
40. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain size allometry. Evolution 331: 402-416.
41. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 786: 3721-3725.
42. Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 376: 1210-1226.
43. Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
44. Losos, J.B., Schoener, T.W., Langerhans, R.B. & Spiller, D.A. 2006. Rapid temporal reversal in predator-driven natural selection. Science 314: 1111.
45. Lowe, C.D., Harvey, I.F., Watts, P.C. & Thompson, D.J. 2009. Reproductive timing and patterns of development for the damselfly Coenagrion puella in the field. Ecology 90: 2202-2212.
46. Madsen, T. & Shine, R. 1993. Temporal variability in sexual selection on reproductive tactics and body size in male snakes. Am. Nat. 141: 167-171.
47. McGlothlin, J.W. 2010. Combining selective episodes to estimate lifetime nonlinear selection. Evolution 64: 1377-1384.
48. McGlothlin, J.W., Moore, A.J., Wolf, J.B. & Brodie, E.D. III 2010. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution. Evolution 64: 2558-2574.
49. McPeek, M.A. 1997. Measuring phenotypic selection on an adaptation: lamellae of damselflies experiencing dragonfly predation. Evolution 51: 459-466.
50. McPeek, M.A. & Gavrilets, S. 2006. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. Evolution 60: 1967-1980.
51. McPeek, M.A., Schrot, A.K. & Brown, J.M. 1996. Adaptation to predators in a new community: swimming performance and predator avoidance in damselflies. Ecology 77: 617-629.
52. McPeek, M.A., Shen, L., Torrey, J.Z. & Farid, H. 2008. The tempo and mode of 3- dimensional morphological evolution in male reproductive structures. Am. Nat. 171: E158-E178.
53. McPeek, M.A., Shen, L. & Farid, H. 2009. The correlated evolution of 3-dimensional reproductive structures between male and female damselflies. Evolution 63: 73-83.
54. McPeek, M.A., Symes, L.B., Zong, D.M. & McPeek, C.L. 2011. Species recognition and patterns of population variation in the reproductive structures of a damselfly genus. Evolution 65: 419-428.
55. Mead, L.S. & Arnold, S.J. 2004. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 264-271.
56. Moore, A.J., Brodie, E.D. III & Wolf, J.B. 1997. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51: 1352-1362.
57. Paulson, D.R. 1974. Reproductive isolation in damselflies. Syst. Zool. 23: 40-49.
58. Phillips, P.C. & Arnold, S.J. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 436: 1209-1222.
59. Pigliucci, M. 2001. Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
60. Preziosi, R.F. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2000. Lifetime selection on adult body size and components of body size in a water strider: opposing selection and maintenance of sexual size dimorphism. Evolution 54: 558-566.
61. Punzalan, D., Rodd, F.H. & Rowe, L. 2010. Temporal variation in patterns of multivariate sexual selection in a wild insect population. Am. Nat. 175: 401-414.
62. Rantala, M.J., Hovi, M., Korkeamäki, E. & Suhonen, J. 2001. No seasonal variation in size of damselfly Calopteryx virgo L. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 38: 117-122.
63. Reimchen, T.E. & Nosil, P. 2002. Temporal variation in divergent selection on spine number in threespine stickleback. Evolution 56: 2472-2483.
64. Reznick, D.N. & Ghalambor, C.K. 2005. Selection in nature: experimental manipulations of natural populations. Int. Comp. Biol. 45: 456-462.
65. Robertson, H.M. & Paterson, H.E.H. 1982. Mate recognition and mechanical isolation in Enallagma damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Evolution 36: 243-250.
66. Rowe, L. & Ludwig, D. 1991. Size and timing of metamorphosis in complex life cycles: time constraints and variation. Ecology 72: 413-427.
67. Rowe, L., Ludwig, D. & Schluter, D. 1994. Time, condition and the seasonal decline of avian clutch size. Am. Nat. 143: 698-722.
68. Schemske, D.W. & Horvitz, C.C. 1989. Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. Evolution 43: 461-465.
69. Schluter, D. 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42: 849-861.
70. Shaw, R.G. & Geyer, C.J. 2010. Inferring fitness landscapes. Evolution 64: 2510-2520.
71. Shaw, R.G., Geyer, C.J., Wagenius, S., Hangelbroek, H.H. & Etterson, J.R. 2008. Unifying life history analysis for inference of fitness and population growth. Am. Nat. 172: E35-E47.
72. Siepielski, A.M. & Benkman, C.W. 2007. Extreme environmental variation sharpens selection that drives the evolution of a mutualism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274: 1799-1806.
73. Siepielski, A.M., DiBattista, J.D. & Carlson, S.M. 2009. It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild. Ecol. Lett. 1211: 1261-1276.
74. Siepielski, A.M., DiBattista, J.D., Evans, J. & Carlson, S.M. 2011. Differences in the temporal dynamics of selection among fitness components in the wild. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 278: 1572-1580.
75. Sinervo, B., Doughty, P., Huey, R.B. & Zamudio, K. 1992. Allometric engineering: a causal analysis of natural selection on offspring size. Science 258: 1927-1930.
76. Sokolovska, N., Rowe, L. & Johansson, F. 2000. Fitness and body size in mature odonates. Ecol. Entomol. 25: 239-248.
77. Stoks, R. 2000. Components of lifetime mating success and body size in males of a scrambling damselfly. Anim. Behav. 59: 339-348.
78. Stoks, R. 2001. Male-biased sex ratios in mature damselfly populations: real or artefact? Ecol. Entomol. 26: 181-187.
79. Strobbe, F., McPeek, M.A., De Block, M., De Meester, L. & Stoks, R. 2009. Survival selection on escape performance and its underlying phenotypic traits: a case of many-to-one mapping. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 1172-1182.
80. Svanbäck, R. & Persson, L. 2009. Population density fluctuations change the selection gradient in Eurasian perch. Am. Nat. 173: 507-516.
81. Sved, J.A. 1981a. A two-sex polygenic model for the evolution of premating isolation. I. Deterministic theory for natural populations. Genetics 97: 197-215.
82. Sved, J.A. 1981b. A two-sex polygenic model for the evolution of premating isolation. II Computer simulation of experimental selection procedures. Genetics 97: 217-235.
83. Svensson, E.I., Eroukhmanoff, F. & Friberg, M. 2006. Effects of natural and sexual selection on adaptive population divergence and premating isolation in a damselfly. Evolution 60: 1242-1253.
84. Tennessen, K.J. 1982. Review of reproductive isolating barriers in Odonata. Adv. Odonatol. 1: 251-265.
85. Thompson, D.J. & Fincke, O.M. 2002. Body size and fitness in Odonata, stabilizing selection: critique of a meta-analysis. Ecol. Entomol. 27: 378-384.
86. Vannote, R.L. & Sweeney, B.W. 1980. Geographic analysis of thermal equilibria: a conceptual model for evaluating the effect of natural and modified thermal regimes on aquatic insect communities. Am. Nat. 115: 667-695.
87. Via, S. 1993. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: target or by-product of selection in a variable environment. Am. Nat. 142: 352-365.
88. Via, S., Gomulkiewicz, R., DeJong, G., Scheiner, S.M., Schlichting, C.D. & VanTiendern, P.H. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 212-217.
89. Wade, M.J. & Kalisz, S. 1989. The additive partitioning of selection gradients. Evolution 43: 1567-1569.
90. Wade, M.J. & Kalisz, S. 1990. The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44: 1947-1955.
91. Wade, M.J. & Shuster, S.M. 2004. Sexual selection: harem size and the variance in male reproductive success. Am. Nat. 164: E83-E89.
92. Westfall, M.J. & May, M.L. 2006. Damselflies of North America, 2nd edition. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, FL.
93. Whitlock, M.C. 1997. Founder effects and peak shifts without genetic drift: adaptive peak shifts occur easily when environments fluctuate slightly. Evolution 51: 1044-1048.
94. Wolf, J.B. & Moore, A.J. 2010. Interacting phenotypes and indirect genetic effects: a genetic perspective on the evolution of social behavior. In: Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology (D.F. Westneat & C.W. Fox, eds), pp. 225-245. Oxford University Press, New York.
95. Wolf, J.B., Brodie, E.D. III, Cheverud, J.M., Moore, A.J. & Wade, M.J. 1998. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 64-69.
96. Wolf, J.B., Brodie, E.D. III & Moore, A.J. 1999. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. Am. Nat. 153: 254-266.