Differences in the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection among fitness components in the wild

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 278, Issue 1711, 2011, Pages 1572-1580

  Siepielski, Adam M ^a   DiBattista, Joseph D ^b   Evans, Jeffrey A ^a   Carlson, Stephanie M ^c  

^a Dartmouth College ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Fecundity; Mating success; Natural selection; Sexual selection; Survival

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; DATABASE; FECUNDITY; FITNESS; LINEARITY; MATING SUCCESS; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SURVIVAL; TEMPORAL VARIATION; WILD POPULATION;

EID: 79951893163     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1973     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Rieseberg, L. H., Widmer, A., Arntz, A. M. & Burke, J. M. 2002 Directional selection is the primary cause of phenotypic diversification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 99, 12 242-12 245. (doi:10.1073/pnas.192360899)
2. Ritchie, M. G. 2007 Sexual selection and speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 79-102. (doi:10.1146/ annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095733)
3. Schluter, D. 2009 Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323, 737-741. (doi:10.1126/science.1160006)
4. van Doorn, G. S., Edelaar, P. & Weissing, F. J. 2009 On the origin of species by natural and sexual selection. Science 326, 1704-1707. (doi:10.1126/science.1181661)
5. Darwin, C. 1871 The descent of man and selection in relation to sex, 1st edn. London, UK: John Murray.
6. Siepielski, A. M., DiBattista, J. D. & Carlson, S. M. 2009 It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild. Ecol. Lett. 121, 1261-1276. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01381.x)
7. Bell, G. 2010 Fluctuating selection: the perpetual renewal of adaptation in variable environments. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 87-97. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2009. 0150)
8. Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. 2002 Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science 296, 707-711. (doi:10.1126/science.1070315)
9. Cornwallis, C. K. & Uller, T. 2010 Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 253, 145-152. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.09.008)
10. Jann, P., Blanckenhorn, W. U. & Ward, P. I. 2000 Temporal and microspatial variation in the intensities of natural and sexual selection in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 927-938. (doi:10. 1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00230.x)
11. Gosden, T. P. & Svensson, E. I. 2008 Spatial and temporal dynamics in a sexual selection mosaic. Evolution 62, 845-856. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008. 00323.x)
12. Punzalan, D., Rodd, F. H. & Rowe, L. 2010 Temporal variation in patterns of multivariate sexual selection in a wild insect population. Am. Nat. 175, 401-414. (doi:10.1086/650719)
13. Twiss, S. D., Thomas, C., Poland, V., Graves, J. A. & Pomeroy, P. 2007 The impact of climatic variation in the opportunity for sexual selection. Biol. Lett. 3, 12-15. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0559)
14. Qvarnström, A. 2001 Context-dependent genetic benefits from mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 5-7. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02030-9)
15. Kokko, H., Brooks, R., McNamara, J. M. & Houston, A. I. 2002 The sexual selection continuum. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1331-1340. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2020)
16. Chaine, A. S. & Lyon, B. E. 2008 Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Science 319, 459-462. (doi:10.1126/science.1149167)
17. Andersson, M. 1994 Sexual selection, p. 599. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Badyaev, A. V. & Qvarnström, A. 2002 Putting sexual traits into the context of an organism: a life-history perspective in studies of sexual selection. Auk 119, 302-310. (doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0301: PSTITC]2.0.CO;2)
19. Schluter, D., Price, T. & Rowe, L. 1991 Conflicting selection pressures and life history trade-offs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 246, 11-14. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 1991.0118)
20. Hoekstra, H. E., Hoekstra, J. M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S. N., Hoang, A., Hill, C. E., Beerli, P. & Kingsolver, J. G. 2001 Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 98, 9157-9160. (doi:10.1073/pnas.161281098)
21. Quinn, T. P., Hendry, A. P. & Buck, G. B. 2001 Balancing natural and sexual selection in sockeye salmon: interactions between body size, reproductive opportunity and vulnerability to predation by bears. Evol. Ecol. Res. 38, 917-937.
22. Hamon, T. R. & Foote, C. J. 2005 Concurrent natural and sexual selection in wild male sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Evolution 59, 1104-1118.
23. Svensson, E. I. & Gosden, T. P. 2007 Contemporary evolution of secondary sexual traits in the wild. Funct. Ecol. 21, 422-433. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007. 01265.x)
24. Robinson, M. R., Pilkington, J. G., Clutton-Brock, T. H., Pemberton, J. M. & Kruuk, L. E. B. 2008 Environmental heterogeneity generates fluctuating selection on a secondary sexual trait. Curr. Biol. 18, 751-757. (doi:10.1016/j. cub.2008.04.059)
25. Hunt, J., Breuker, C. J., Sadowski, J. A. & Moore, A. J. 2009 Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 13-26. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101. 2008.01633.x)
26. Lande, R. & Arnold, S. J. 1983 The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210-1226. (doi:10.2307/2408842)
27. Stinchcombe, J. R., Agrawal, A. F., Hohenlohe, P., Arnold, S. J. & Blows, M. W. 2008 Estimating nonlinear selection gradients using quadratic regression coefficients: double or nothing? Evolution 62, 2435-2440. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00449.x)
28. Cox, R. M. & Calsbeek, R. 2009 Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173, 176-187. (doi:10. 1086/595841)
29. Endler, J. 1986 Natural selection in the wild. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30. Kingsolver, J. G. et al. 2001 The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157, 245-261. (doi:10.1086/319193)
31. Estes, S. & Arnold, S. J. 2007 Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales. Am. Nat. 169, 227-244. (doi:10.1086/510633)
32. Carlson, S. M. & Quinn, T. P. 2007 Ten years of varying lake level and selection on size-at-maturity in sockeye salmon. Ecology 88, 2620-2629. (doi:10.1890/06-1171.1)
33. Wade, M. J. & Kalisz, S. 1990 The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44, 1947-1955. (doi:10.2307/ 2409605)
34. Calsbeek, R. & Cox, R. M. Experimentally assessing the relative importance of predation and competition as agents of selection. Nature 465, 613-616. (doi:10.1038/ nature09020)
35. Losos, J. B., Schoener, T. W., Langerhans, R. B. & Spiller, D. A. 2006 Rapid temporal reversal in predatordriven natural selection. Science 314, 1111. (doi:10. 1126/science.1133584)
36. Svensson, E. I., Eroukhmanoff, F. & Friberg, M. 2006 Effects of natural and sexual selection on adaptive population divergence and premating isolation in a damselfly. Evolution 60, 1242-1253. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820. 2006.tb01202.x)
37. Fisher, R. 1930 The genetical theory of natural selection, 1st edn. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
38. Lande, R. 1981 Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 78, 3721-3725. (doi:10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721)
39. Phillips, P. C. & Arnold, S. J. 1989 Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43, 1209-1222. (doi:10. 2307/2409357)
40. Lande, R. 1979 Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain size allometry. Evolution 33, 402-416. (doi:10.2307/2407630)
41. Kingsolver, J. G. & Pfennig, D. W. 2007 Patterns and power of phenotypic selection in nature. Bioscience 57, 561-571. (doi:10.1641/B570706)
42. Arnold, S. J. & Wade, M. J. 1984 On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38 709-719. (doi:10.2307/2408383)
43. Wade, M. J. & Kalisz, S. 1989 The additive partitioning of selection gradients. Evolution 43, 1567-1569. (doi:10. 2307/2409471)
44. Shaw, R. G., Geyer, C. J., Wagenius, S., Hangelbroek, H. H. & Etterson, J. R. 2008 Unifying life history analysis for inference of fitness and population growth. Am. Nat. 172, E35-E47. (doi:10.1086/588063)
45. Shaw, R. G. & Geyer, C. J. 2010 Inferring fitness landscapes. Evolution 64, 2510-2520. (doi:10.1111/j. 1558-5646.2010.01010.x)
46. Rausher, M. D. 1992 The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46, 616-626. (doi:10.2307/2409632)
47. Schemske, D. W. & Bradshaw, H. D. 1999 Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA. 21, 11 910-11 915.
48. Nachman, M. W., Hoekstra, H. E. & D'Agostino, S. L. 2003 The genetic basis of adaptive melanism in pocket mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 100, 5268-5273. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0431157100)
49. Barrett, R. D. H., Rogers, S. M. & Schluter, D. 2008 Natural selection on a major armor gene in threespine stickleback. Science 322, 255-257. (doi:10.1126/ science.1159978)
50. Bell, M. A., Futuyma, D. J., Eanes, W. F. & Levinton, J. S. 2010 Evolution since Darwin: the first 150 years. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
51. Hersch, E. & Phillips, P. C. 2004 Power and potential bias in the detection of selection in natural populations. Evolution 58, 479-485.
52. Lorch, P., Proulx, S., Rowe, L. & Day, T. 2003 Condition dependent sexual selection accelerates adaptation by natural selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5, 867-881.
53. Hansen, T. F. & Houle, D. 2008 Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 1201-1219. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101. 2008.01573.x)
54. Merilä, J., Kruuk, L. E. & Sheldon, B. C. 2001 Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies of natural populations. Genetica 112/113, 199-222. (doi:10.1023/ A:1013391806317)