The quantitative genetics of social behaviour

Social Behaviour: Genes, Ecology and Evolution

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 29-54

  Bleakley, Bronwyn H ^a   Wolf, Jason B ^b   Moore, Allen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925672338     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511781360.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (115)

1. Agrawal, A. F., Brodie, E. D. & Wade, M. J. (2001a) On indirect genetic effects in structured populations. American Naturalist, 158, 308–323.
2. Agrawal, A. F., Brodie, E. D. & Brown, J. (2001b) Parent–offspring coadaptation and the dual genetic control of maternal care. Science, 292, 1710–1712.
3. Allee, W. C. (1927) Animal aggregations. Quarterly Review of Biology, II, 367–398.
4. Aragaki, D. L. R. & Meffert, L. M. (1998) A test of how well the repeatability of courtship predicts its heritability. Animal Behaviour, 55,1141–1150.
5. Bacigalupe, L. D., Crudginton, H. S., Slate, J., Moore, A. J. & Snook, R. R. (2008) Sexual selection and interacting phenotypes in experimental evolution: a study of Drosophila pseu– doobscura mating behavior. Evolution, 62, 1804–1812.
6. Bateson, P. (2004) The active role of behavior in evolution. Biology and Philosophy, 19, 283–298.
7. Bernardo, J. (1996) Maternal effects in animal ecology. American Zoologist, 36, 83–105.
8. Bijma, P. & Wade, M. J. (2008) The joint effects ofkin, multilevel selection and indirect genetic effects on response to genetic selection. Journal ofEvolutionary Biology, 21,1175–1188.
9. Bijma, P., Muir, W. M. & Arendonk, J. A. M. V. (2007a) Multilevel selection 1: Quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics, 175, 277–288.
10. Bijma, P., Muir, W. M., Ellen, E. D., Wolf, J. B. & Arendonk, J. A. M. V. (2007b) Multilevel selection 2: Estimating the genetic parameters determining inheritance and response to selection. Genetics, 175, 289–299.
11. Bleakley, B. H. & Brodie, E. D. (2009) Indirect genetic effects influence antipredator behavior in guppies: estimates of the coefficient of interaction psi and the inheritance of reciprocity. Evolution, 63, 1796–1806.
12. Bleakley, B. H., Martell, C. M. & Brodie, E. D. (2006) Variation in anti–predator behavior among five strains of inbred guppies, Poecilia reticulata. Behavior Genetics, 36,783–791.
13. Bleakley, B. H., Parker, D. J. & Brodie, E. D. (2007) Nonadditive effects of group membership can lead to additive group phenotypes for anti–predator behaviour of guppies, Poecilia reticulata. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20,1375–1384.
14. Bleakley, B. H., Eklund, A. C. & Brodie, E. D. (2008) Are designer guppies inbred? Microsatellite variation in five strains of ornamental guppies. Poecilia reticulata, used for behavior research. Zebrafish, 5,39–48.
15. Boake, C. R. B., Arnold, S. J., Breden, F. et al. (2002) Genetic tools for studying adaptation and the evolution of behavior. American Naturalist, 160, S143 –159.
16. Brodie, E. D. (2000) Why evolutionary genetics does not always add up. In: Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process, ed. J. B. Wolf, E. D. Brodie & M. J. Wade. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–19.
17. Burmeister, S. S., Jarvis, E. D. & Fernald, R. D. (2005) Rapid behavioral and genomic responses to social opportunity. PLoS Biology, 3 (11), e363.
18. Caro, T., ed. (1998) Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. & Rowe, L. (2003) Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 41–47.
20. Chenoweth, S. F. & Blows, M. W. (2006) Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7,681–692.
21. Cheverud, J. M. & Moore, A. J. (1994) Quantitative genetics and the role of the environment provided by relatives in behavioral evolution. In: Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution, ed. C. R. B. Boake. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 67–100.
22. Clark, A. G. & Begun, D. J. (1998) Female genotypes affect sperm displacement in Drosophila. Genetics, 149,1487–1493.
23. Clark, A. G., Begun, D. J. & Prout, T. (1999) Female x male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science, 283, 217 –220.
24. Cowley, D. E., Pomp, D., Atchley, W. R., Eisen, E. J. & Hawkins–Brown, D. (1989) The impact of maternal uterine genotype on postnatal growth and adult body size in mice. Genetics, 122,193–203.
25. Cummings, M. E., Larkins-Ford, J., Reilly, C. R. L. et al. (2008) Sexual and social stimuli elicit rapid and contrasting genomic responses. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275, 393 –402.
26. Danielson-Frangois, A., Zhou, Y. & Greenfield, M. D. (2009) Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter–genotypic competition may strengthen genotype x environment interactions and conserve genetic variance. Genetica, 136, 27 –36.
27. Darwin, C. (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray.
28. Darwin, C. (1871) The Descent ofMan, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
29. Dawkins, R. (1982) The Extended Phenotype: the Gene as the Unit of Selection. San Francisco: Freeman Press.
30. D'Ettorre, P. & Moore, A. J. (2008) Chemical communication and the coordination of social interactions in insects. In: Sociobiology of Communication: an Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. P. D'Ettorre & D. P. Hughes. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 81–96.
31. Elgar, M. A. & Crespi, B., eds. (1992) Cannibalism, Ecology and Evolution Among Diverse Taxa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Evans, J. P., Kelley, J. L., Bisazza, A., Finazzo, E. & Pilastro, A. (2004) Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 271, 2035 –2042.
33. Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Harlow: Longman.
34. Fewell, J. H. (2003) Social insect networks. Science, 301, 1867–1870.
35. Fisher, R. A. (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52, 399–433.
36. Frank, S. A. (1997) Fisher's fundamental theorem, kin selection, and causal analysis. Evolution, 51, 1712–1729.
37. Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D. & Briscoe, D. A. (2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Fuller, J. L. & Hahn, M. E. (1976) Issues in the genetics of social behavior. Behavior Genetics, 6,391–406.
39. Garcia-Gonzalez, F. & Simmons, L. W. (2005) The evolution of polyandry: intrinsic sire effects contribute to embryo viability. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18, 1097–1103.
40. Gosling, L. M. & Sutherland, W. J. (2000) Behaviour and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Grindstaff, J. L., Brodie, E. D. & Ketterson, E. D. (2003) Immune function across generations: integrating mechanism and evolutionary process in maternal antibody transmission. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 270, 2309–2319.
42. Hager, R. & Johnstone, R. A. (2003) The genetic basis of family conflict resolution in mice. Nature, 421,533–535.
43. Hahn, M. E. & Schanz, N. (1996) Issues in the genetics of social behavior: revisited. Behavior Genetics, 26, 463 –470.
44. Hamilton, W. D. (1964) The genetical theory of social behavior I. JournalofTheoretical Biology, 7,1–16.
45. Higgins, L. A., Jones, J. M. & Wayne, M. L. (2005) Quantitative genetics of natural variation of behavior in Drosophila mela– nogaster: the possible role of social environment on creating persistent patterns of group activity. Evolution, 59, 1529 –1539.
46. House, C. M., Evans, G. M.V., Smiseth, P. T. et al. (2008) The evolution of repeated mating in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. Evolution, 62, 2004–2014.
47. Isles, A. R., Humby, T., Walters, E. & Wilkinson, L. S. (2004) Common genetic effects on variation in impulsivity and activity in mice. Journal of Neuroscience, 24,6733–6740.
48. larvis, E. D., Scharff, C., Grossman, M. R., Ramos, J. A. & Nottebohm, F. (1998) For whom the bird sings: context– dependent gene expression. Neuron, 21, 775–88.
49. Kempenaers, B. (2007) Mate choice and genetic quality: a review of the heterozygosity theory. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 37, 189 –278.
50. Kent, C., Azanchi, R., Smith, B., Formosa, A. & Levine, J. D. (2008) Social context influences chemical communication in D. melanogaster males. Current Biology, 18, 1384–1389.
51. Kirkpatrick, M. & Lande, R. (1989) The evolution of maternal characters. Evolution, 43,485–503.
52. Kolliker, M. (2005) Ontogeny in the family. Behavior Genetics, 35,7–18.
53. Kolliker, M. & Richner, H. (2001) Parent–offspring conflict and the genetics of offspring solicitation and parental response. Animal Behaviour, 62,395–407.
54. Kolliker, M., Brinkhof, M. W. G., Heeb, P., Fitze, P. S. & Richner, H. (2000) The quantitative genetic basis of offspring solicitation and parental response in a passerine bird with biparental care. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 267, 2127 –2132.
55. Kolliker, M., Brodie, E. D. & Moore, A. J. (2005) The coadaptation of parental supply and offspring demand. American Naturalist, 166, 506–516.
56. Komers, P. E. (1997) Behavioural plasticity in variable environments. Canadian Journal ofZoology–Revue Canadienne De Zoologie,75, 161–169.
57. Kotiaho, J. S., Simmons, L. W., Hunt, J. & Tomkins, J. L. (2003) Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus. American Naturalist, 161, 852–859.
58. Krupp, J. J., Kent, C., Billeter, J.-C. et al. (2008) Social experience modifies pheromone expression and mating behavior in male Drosophila melanogaster. Current Biology, 18, 1373–1383.
59. Kruuk, L. E. B. (2004) Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the ‘animal model' Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359,873–890.
60. Kuussaari, M., Saccheri, I., Camara, M. & Hanski, I. (1998) Allee effect and population dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Oikos, 82, 384–392.
61. Lande, R. (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 78, 3721–3725.
62. Lewontin, R. & Matsuo, Y. (1963) Interaction of genotypes determining the viability in Drosophila busckii. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 49, 270 –278.
63. Linksvayer, T. A. (2006) Direct, maternal, and sibsocial genetic effects on individual and colony traits in an ant. Evolution, 60, 2552–2561.
64. Linksvayer, T. A. (2007) Ant species differences determined by epistasis between brood and worker genomes. PLoS ONE, 2 (10), e994.
65. Lock, J. E., Smiseth, P. T. & Moore, A. J. (2004) Selection, inheritance and the evolution of parent–offspring interactions. American Naturalist, 164, 13 –24.
66. Lynch, M. (1987) Evolution of intrafamilial interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 84, 8501–8511.
67. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
68. Manning, A. (1961) The effects of artificial selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour, 9, 82 –92.
69. Meffert, L. M. (1995) Bottleneck effects on genetic variance for courtship repertoire. Genetics, 139, 365 –374.
70. Meffert, L. M. & Regan, J. L. (2002) A test of speciation via sexual selection on female preferences. Animal Behaviour, 64, 955 –965.
71. Messina, F. J. (1998) Maternal influences on larval competition in insects. In: Maternal Effects as Adaptations, ed. T. A. Mousseau & C. W. Fox. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 227–243.
72. Miller, C. W. & Moore, A. J. (2007) A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 1279–1286.
73. Moore, A. J. & Pizzari, T. (2005) Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes. American Naturalist, 165, S88 –97.
74. Moore, A. J., Brodie, E. D. & Wolf, J. B. (1997) Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution, 51, 1352–1362.
75. Moore, A. J., Wolf, J. B. & Brodie, E. D. (1998) The influence of direct and indirect genetic effects on the evolution of behavior: social and sexual selection meet maternal effects. In: Maternal Effects as Adaptations, ed. T. A. Mousseau & C. W. Fox. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–41.
76. Moore, A. J., Haynes, K. F., Preziosi, R. F. & Moore, P. J. (2002) The evolution of interacting phenotypes: genetics and evolution of social dominance. American Naturalist, 160, S186–197.
77. Mousseau, T. A. & Fox, C. W., eds. (1998) Maternal Effects as Adaptations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
78. Mutic, J. J. & Wolf, J. B. (2007) Indirect genetic effects from ecological interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Ecology, 16, 2371–2381.
79. Nelson, R. J., ed. (2005) Biology ofAggression. NewYork, NY: Oxford University Press.
80. Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N. & Feldman, M. W. (2003) Niche Construction: the Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
81. Petfield, D., Chenoweth, S. F., Rundle, H. D. & Blows, M. W. (2005) Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 6045–6050.
82. Price, T. (1998) Maternal and paternal effects in birds: effects on offspring fitness. In: Maternal Effects as Adaptations, ed. T. A. Mousseau & C. W. Fox. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 202–226.
83. Queller, D. C. (1992a) A general model for kin selection. Evolution, 46, 376–380.
84. Queller, D. C. (1992b) Quantitative genetics, inclusive fitness, and group selection. American Naturalist, 139, 540 –558.
85. Rauter, C. M. & Moore, A. J. (2002) Evolutionary importance of parental care performance, food resources, and direct and indirect genetic effects in a burying beetle. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 15, 407 –417.
86. Reznick, D., Callahan, H. & Llauredo, R. (1996) Maternal effects on offspring quality in poeciliid fishes. American Zoologist, 36, 147 –156.
87. Riska, B., Rutledge, J. J. & Atchley, W. R. (1985) Covariance between direct and maternal genetic effects in mice, with a model of persistent environmental influences. Genetical Research, 45, 287–297.
88. Roff, D. A. (1997) Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. New York, NY; London: Chapman & Hall.
89. Ruiz-Dubreuil, D. G. & del Solar, E. (1993) A diallele analysis of gregarious oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 70, 281–284.
90. Simmons, L. W. & Moore, A. J. (2008) Evolutionary quantitative genetics of sperm. In: Sperm Biology: an Evolutionary Perspective, ed. T. R. Birkhead, D. J. Hosken & S. Pitnick. London: Academic Press, pp. 405–434.
91. Stephens, P. A. & Sutherland, W. J. (1999) Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14,401–405.
92. Stone, G. N. & Cook, J. M. (1998) The structure of cynipid oak galls: patterns in the evolution of an extended phenotype. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 265, 979 –988.
93. Tinbergen, N. (1953) Social Behaviour in Animals, with Special Reference to Vertebrates. London: Wiley.
94. Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. (2000) Genetic compatability, mate choice and patterns of parantage: Invited review. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1013–1027.
95. Wade, M. J. (1998) The evolutionary genetics of maternal effects. In: Maternal Effects as Adaptations, ed. T. A. Mousseau & C. W. Fox. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 5–21.
96. Wang, J., Ross, K. G. & Keller, L. (2008) Genome–wide expression patterns and the genetic architecture of a fundamental social trait. PLoS Genetics, 4 (7), e 1000127.
97. Wang, L., Dankert, H., Perona, P. & Anderson, D. J. (2008) A common genetic target for environmental and heritable influences on aggressiveness in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 5657–5663.
98. Weis, A. E., Walton, R. & Crego, C. L. (1988) Reactive plant tissue sites and the population biology of gall makers. Annual Review of Entomology, 33, 467–486.
99. Weis, A. E., Abrahamson, W. G. & Andersen, M. C. (1992) Variable selection on Eurosta's gall size, I. The extent and nature of variation in phenotypic selection. Evolution, 46, 1674 –1697.
100. West-Eberhard, M. J. (1979) Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 123, 222–234.
101. West-Eberhard, M. J. (1983) Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Quarterly Review of Biology, 58, 155 –183.
102. West-Eberhard, M. J. (1984) Sexual selection, competitive communication, and species–specific signals in insects. In: Insect Communication, ed. T. Lewis. London: Academic Press, pp. 283–324.
103. West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003) Gaps and inconsistencies in modern evolutionary thought. In: Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–20.
104. Wilson, A. J., Gelin, U., Perron, M.-C. & Reale, D. (2009) Indirect genetic effects and the evolution of aggression in a vertebrate system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 276, 533–541.
105. Winberg, S., Winberg, Y. & Fernald, R. D. (1997) Effect of social rank on brain monoaminergic activity in a cichlid fish. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 49, 230–236.
106. Wolf, J. B. (2000a) Indirect genetic effects and gene interactions. In: Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process, ed. J. B. Wolf, E. D. Brodie & M. J. Wade. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 158–176.
107. Wolf, J. B. (2000b) Gene interactions from maternal effects. Evolution, 54, 1882–1898.
108. Wolf, J. B. (2003) Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100,4655–4660.
109. Wolf, J. B. & Brodie, E. D. (1998) The coadaptation of parental and offspring characters. Evolution, 52, 299 –308.
110. Wolf, J. B. & Moore, A. J. (2010) Interacting phenotypes and indirect genetic effects: a genetic perspective on the evolution of social behavior. In: Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology, ed. D. F. Westneat & C. W. Fox. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 225–245.
111. Wolf, J. B., Moore, A. J. & Brodie, E. D. (1997) The evolution of indicator traits for parental quality: the role of maternal and paternal effects. American Naturalist, 150, 639–649.
112. Wolf, J. B., Brodie, E. D., Cheverud, J. M., Moore, A. J. & Wade, M. J. (1998) Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13,64–69.
113. Wolf, J. B., Brodie, E. D. & Moore, A. J. (1999a) Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. American Naturalist, 153, 254–266.
114. Wolf, J. B., Brodie, E. D. & Moore, A. J. (1999b) The role of maternal and paternal effects in the evolution of parental quality by sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12,1157–1167.
115. Woolley, S. C. & Doupe, A. J. (2008) Social context–induced song variation affects female behavior and gene expression. PLoS Biology, 6 (3), e62.