DBAC: A simple prediction method for protein binding hot spots based on burial levels and deeply buried atomic contacts

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 5, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Li, Zhenhua ^a   Wong, Limsoon ^b   Li, Jinyan ^a,b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MUTAGENESIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; THERMODYNAMICS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUTAGENESIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 79959269001     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-S1-S5     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Jones S, Thornton JM. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996, 93:13-20. 10.1073/pnas.93.1.13, 40170, 8552589.
2. Keskin O, Gursoy A, Ma B, Nussinov R. Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact?. Chem Rev 2008, 108(4):1225-1244. 10.1021/cr040409x, 18355092.
3. Xu D, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R. Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges across protein-protein interfaces. Protein Eng 1997, 10(9):999-1012. 10.1093/protein/10.9.999, 9464564.
4. Sun DP, Sauer U, Nicholson H, Matthews BW. Contributions of engineered surface salt bridges to the stability of T4 lysozyme determined by directed mutagenesis. Biochemistry 1991, 30(29):7142-53. 10.1021/bi00243a015, 1854726.
5. Fernàndez A, Scheraga HA. Insufficiently dehydrated hydrogen bonds as determinants of protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:113-118. 10.1073/pnas.0136888100, 140898, 12518060.
6. Sharp KA, Nicholls A, Fine RF, Honig B. Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects. Science 1991, 252(5002):106-109. 10.1126/science.2011744, 2011744.
7. Bogan AA, Thorn KS. Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 1998, 280:1-9. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1843, 9653027.
8. Keskin O, Ma B, Nussinov R. Hot regions in protein-protein interactions: the organization and contribution of structurally conserved hot spot residues. J Mol Biol 2005, 345(5):1281-1294. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.077, 15644221.
9. Moreira ISS, Fernandes PAA, Ramos MJJ. Hot spots-A review of the protein-protein interface determinant amino-acid residues. Proteins 2007, 68(4):803-812. 10.1002/prot.21396, 17546660.
10. Cunningham B, Wells J. High-resolution epitope mapping of hGH-receptor interactions by alanine-scanning mutagenesis. Science 1989, 244(4908):1081-1085. 10.1126/science.2471267, 2471267.
11. Wells JA. Systematic mutational analyses of protein-protein interfaces. Molecular Design and Modeling: Concepts and Applications Part A: Proteins, Peptides, and Enzymes, Volume 202 of Methods in Enzymology 1991, 390-411. Academic Press, Langone JJ.
12. Clackson T, Wells JA. A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface. Science 1995, 267(5196):383-386. 10.1126/science.7529940, 7529940.
13. Guney E, Tuncbag N, Keskin O, Gursoy A. HotSprint: database of computational hot spots in protein interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 36(Database):D662-D666. 10.1093/nar/gkm813, 2238999, 17959648.
14. Darnell SJ, Page D, Mitchell JC. An automated decision-tree approach to predicting protein interaction hot spots. Proteins 2007, 68(4):813-823. 10.1002/prot.21474, 17554779.
15. Cho KI, Kim D, Lee D. A feature-based approach to modeling protein-protein interaction hot spots. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37(8):2672-2687. 10.1093/nar/gkp132, 2677884, 19273533.
16. Tuncbag N, Gursoy A, Keskin O. Identification of computational hot spots in protein interfaces: combining solvent accessibility and inter-residue potentials improves the accuracy. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(12):1513-1520. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp240, 19357097.
17. Xia JF, Zhao XM, Song J, Huang DS. APIS: accurate prediction of hot spots in protein interfaces by combining protrusion index with solvent accessibility. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:174. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-174, 2874803, 20377884.
18. Massova I, Kollman PA. Computational Alanine Scanning To Probe Protein-Protein Interactions: A Novel Approach To Evaluate Binding Free Energies. J Am Chem Soc 1999, 121(36):8133-8143.
19. Kortemme T, Baker D. A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99(22):14116-14121. 10.1073/pnas.202485799, 137846, 12381794.
20. Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L. Predicting Changes in the Stability of Proteins and Protein Complexes: A Study of More Than 1000 Mutations. J Mol Biol 2002, 320(2):369-387. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00442-4, 12079393.
21. Kortemme T, Kim DE, Baker D. Computational Alanine Scanning of Protein-Protein Interfaces. Sci STKE 2004, 2004(219):pl2. 10.1126/stke.2192004pl2, 14872095.
22. Pokala N, Handel TM. Energy Functions for Protein Design: Adjustment with Protein-Protein Complex Affinities, Models for the Unfolded State, and Negative Design of Solubility and Specificity. J Mol Biol 2005, 347:203-227. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.12.019, 15733929.
23. Benedix A, Becker CM, de Groot BL, Caflisch A, Bockmann RA. Predicting free energy changes using structural ensembles. Nature Methods 2009, 6:3-4. 10.1038/nmeth0109-3, 19116609.
24. Lise S, Archambeau C, Pontil M, Jones D. Prediction of hot spot residues at protein-protein interfaces by combining machine learning and energy-based methods. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:365. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-365, 2777894, 19878545.
25. Assi SA, Tanaka T, Rabbitts TH, Fernandez-Fuentes N. PCRPi: Presaging Critical Residues in Protein interfaces, a new computational tool to chart hot spots in protein interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38(6). 10.1093/nar/gkp1158, 2847225, 20008102.
26. Thorn KS, Bogan AA. ASEdb: a database of alanine mutations and their effects on the free energy of binding in protein interactions. Bioinformatics 2001, 17(3):284-285. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.3.284, 11294795.
27. Cunningham BC, Wells JA. Comparison of a Structural and a Functional Epitope. J Mol Biol 1993, 234(3):554-563. 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1611, 7504735.
28. Dougan D, Malby R, Gruen L, Kortt A, Hudson P. Effects of substitutions in the binding surface of an antibody on antigen affinity. Protein Eng 1998, 11:65-74. 10.1093/protein/11.1.65, 9579662.
29. Clackson T, Ultsch MH, Wells JA, de Vos AM. Structural and Functional Analysis of the 1:1 Growth Hormone:Receptor Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for Receptor Affinity. J Mol Biol 1998, 277(5):1111-1128. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1669, 9571026.
30. Pineda AO, Cantwell AM, Bush LA, Rose T, Di Cera E. The thrombin epitope recognizing thrombomodulin is a highly cooperative hot spot in exosite I. J Biol Chem 2002, 277(35):32015-32019. 10.1074/jbc.M205009200, 12068020.
31. Reichmann D, Rahat O, Albeck S, Meged R, Dym O, Schreiber G. The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:57-62. 10.1073/pnas.0407280102, 544062, 15618400.
32. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:235-242. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235, 102472, 10592235.
33. Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng 1998, 11(9):739-747. 10.1093/protein/11.9.739, 9796821.
34. Li Z, Li J. Geometrically centered region: A " wet" model of protein binding hot spots not excluding water molecules. Proteins 2010, 78(16):3304-3316. 10.1002/prot.22838, 20818601.
35. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 1971, 55(3):379-400. 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-X, 5551392.
36. Barber BC, Dobkin DP, Huhdanpaa H. The Quickhull Algorithm for Convex Hulls. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 1996, 22(4):469-483.
37. Li J, Liu Q. 'Double water exclusion': a hypothesis refining the O-ring theory for the hot spots at protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(6):743-750. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp058, 2654803, 19179356.
38. Dijkstra EW. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1959, 1:269-271.
39. Chakravarty S, Varadarajan R. Residue depth: a novel parameter for the analysis of protein structure and stability. Structure 1999, 7(7):723-732. 10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80097-5, 10425675.
40. Pintar A, Carugo O, Pongor S. DPX: for the analysis of the protein core. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(2):313-314. 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.313, 12538266.
41. Pintar A. Atom Depth as a Descriptor of the Protein Interior. Biophysical Journal 2003, 84(4):2553-2561. 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75060-7, 1302821, 12668463.
42. Pintar A, Carugo O, Pongor S. Atom depth in protein structure and function. Trends Biochem Sci 2003, 28(11):593-597. 10.1016/j.tibs.2003.09.004, 14607089.
43. Hamelryck T. An amino acid has two sides: a new 2D measure provides a different view of solvent exposure. Proteins 2005, 59:38-48. 10.1002/prot.20379, 15688434.
44. Song J, Tan H, Mahmood K, Law RHP, Buckle AM, Webb GI, Akutsu T, Whisstock JC. Prodepth: Predict Residue Depth by Support Vector Regression Approach from Protein Sequences Only. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(9):e7072. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007072, 2742725, 19759917.
45. Yuan Z, Wang ZX. Quantifying the relationship of protein burying depth and sequence. Proteins: Structure Function, and Bioinformatics 2008, 70(2):509-516.
46. Zhang H, Zhang T, Chen K, Shen S, Ruan J, Kurgan L. Sequence based residue depth prediction using evolutionary information and predicted secondary structure. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:388. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-388, 2567998, 18803867.
47. Pace CN, Grimsley GR, Scholtz JM. Protein Ionizable Groups: pK Values and Their Contribution to Protein Stability and Solubility. J Biol Chem 2009, 284(20):13285-13289. 10.1074/jbc.R800080200, 2679426, 19164280.
48. Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines 2001. , http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm
49. Mann HB, Whitney DR. On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1947, 18:50-60.
50. Schymkowitz J, Borg J, Stricher F, Nys R, Rousseau F, Serrano L. The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33.
51. Fischer TB, Arunachalam KV, Bailey D, Mangual V, Bakhru S, Russo R, Huang D, Paczkowski M, Lalchandani V, Ramachandra C, Ellison B, Galer S, Shapley J, Fuentes E, Tsai J. The binding interface database (BID): a compilation of amino acid hot spots in protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(11):1453-1454. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg163, 12874065.
52. Albeck S, Unger R, Schreiber G. Evaluation of direct and cooperative contributions towards the strength of buried hydrogen bonds and salt bridges. J Mol Biol 2000, 298(3):503-520. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3656, 10772866.
53. Waldburger CD, Schildbach JF, Sauer RT. Are buried salt bridges important for protein stability and conformational specificity?. Nat Struct Biol 1995, 2:122-128. 10.1038/nsb0295-122, 7749916.
54. Hendsch ZS, Tidor B. Do salt bridges stabilize proteins? A continuum electrostatic analysis. Protein Sci 1994, 3(2):211-226. 10.1002/pro.5560030206, 2142793, 8003958.
55. Buckle AM, Schreiber G, Fersht AR. Protein-protein recognition: Crystal structural analysis of a barnase-barstar complex at 2.0Å resolution. Biochemistry 1994, 33(30):8878-8889. 10.1021/bi00196a004, 8043575.