The relationship between allocentric and egocentric frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial information processing

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1138-1156

  Ruotolo, Francesco ^a   van der Ham, Ineke J M ^b   Iachini, Tina ^a   Postma, Albert ^b  

^a SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Categorical coordinate spatial relations; Egocentric allocentric frames of reference; Visuoperceptual task

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79958167596     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.539700     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F. X., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Ball, K., Smith, D., Ellison, A., & Schenk, T. (2009). Both egocentric and allocentric cues support spatial priming in visual search. Neuropsychologia, 47(6), 1585-1591.
3. Becker, S. I., Ansorge, U., & Turatto, M. (2009). Saccades reveal that allocentric coding of the moving object causes mislocalisation in the flash-lag effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1313-1324.
4. Bingham, G. P., Bradley, A., Bailey, M., & Vinner, R. (2001). Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: A comparison of actual versus virtual environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1314-1334.
5. Borghi, A. M. (2005). Object concepts and action. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 8-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bridgeman, B., Gemmer, A., Forsman, T., & Huemer, V. (2000). Properties of the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Vision Research, 40, 3539-3552.
7. Bruno, N., Bernardis, P., & Gentilucci, M. (2008). Visually guided pointing, the Müller-Lyer illusion, and the functional interpretation of the dorsal-ventral split: Conclusions from 33 independent studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(3), 423-437.
8. Bruno, N., & Franz, V. (2009). When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1421-1433.
9. Bruyer, R., Scailquin, J. C., & Coibion, P. (1997). Dissociation between categorical and coordinate spatial computations: Modulation by cerebral hemispheres, task properties, mode of response, and age. Brain and Cognition, 33, 245-277.
10. Carey, D. P., Dijkerman, H. C., & Milner, A. D. (1998). Perception and action in depth. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 438-453.
11. Carey, D. P., Dijkerman, H. C., Murphy, K. J., Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (2006). Pointing to places and spaces in a patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1584-1594.
12. Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478-484.
13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
15. Committeri, G., Galati, G., Paradis, A., Pizzamiglio, L., Berthoz, A., & LeBihan, D. (2004). Reference frame for spatial cognition: Different brain areas are involved in viewer-, object-, and landmark-centered judgements about object location. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(9), 1517-1535.
16. Dent, K. (2009). Coding categorical and coordinate spatial relations in visual-spatial short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(12), 2372-2387.
17. Dijkerman, H. C., & Milner, A. D. (1998). The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane: II. Dissociated orientation functions in normal subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 118(3), 408-414.
18. *Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and bio-medical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
19. Franz, V. H. (2001). Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 457-459.
20. Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Bülthoff, H. H., & Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20-25.
21. Galati, G., Lobel, E., Vallar, G., Berthoz, A., Pizzamiglio, L., & Le Bihan, D. (2000). The neural basis of egocentric and allocentric coding of space in humans: A functional magnetic resonance study. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 156-164.
22. Gallese, V. (2007). The "conscious" dorsal stream: Embodied simulation and its role in space and action conscious awareness. PSYCHE, 13/1. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/.
23. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25.
24. Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. NeuroImage, 6, 231-236.
25. Heath, M., Rival, C., Neely, K., & Krigolson, O. (2006). Muller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research, 169, 473-481.
26. Hellige, J. B., & Michimata, C. (1989). Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information. Memory and Cognition, 17, 770-776.
27. Iachini, T., Borghi, A. M., & Senese, V. P. (2008). Categorization and sensorimotor interaction with objects. Brain and Cognition, 67(1), 31-43.
28. Iachini, T., Ruggiero, G., Conson, M., & Trojano, L. (2009). Lateralization of egocentric and allocentric spatial processing after parietal brain lesions. Brain and Cognition, 69(5), 514-520.
29. Iachini, T., Ruotolo, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2009). The effects of familiarity and gender on spatial representation of a real environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(2), 227-234.
30. Jager, G., & Postma, A. (2003). On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: A review of the current evidence. Neuropsychologia, 41, 504-515.
31. Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational analysis. Psychological Review, 94, 148-175.
32. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Kosslyn, S. M., Chabris, C. F., Marsolek, C. J., & Koenig, O. (1992). Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: Computational analyses and computer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 181, 562-577.
34. Kosslyn, S. M., Koenig, O., Barrett, A., Cave, C., Tang, J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1989). Evidence for two types of spatial representations: Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Perception and Performance, 15, 723-735.
35. Laeng, B. (1994). Lateralization of categorical and coordinate spatial functions: A study of unilateral stroke patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 189-203.
36. Laeng, B. (2006). Constructional apraxia after left or right unilateral stroke. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1595-1606.
37. Lenth, R. V. (2007). Post hoc power: Tables and commentary. Retrieved October 1, 2010, from http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/techrep/.
38. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
39. McNamara, T. P., Rump, B., & Werner, S. (2003). Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 589-595.
40. Melmoth, D. R., & Grant, S. (2006). Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 371-388.
41. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2008). Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia, 46, 774-785.
43. Mon-Williams, M., & Dijkerman, H. C. (1999). The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 128, 578-582.
44. Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 162-170.
45. Murphy, K. J., Carey, D. P., & Goodale, M. A. (1998). The perception of spatial relations in a patient with visual form agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15(6-8), 705-722.
46. Neggers, S. F. W., Schölvinck, M. L, van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Postma, A. (2005). Quantifying the interactions between allocentric and egocentric representations of space. Acta Psychologica, 118, 25-45.
47. Neggers, S. F. W., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Ramsey, N. F., & Postma, A. (2006). Interactions between ego-and allocentric neuronal representations of space. NeuroImage, 31, 320-331.
48. O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
49. Paillard, J. (1991). Brain and space. Oxford, UK: Oxford Science Publications.
50. Parrot, M., Doyon, B., Démonet, J. F., & Cardebat, D. (1999). Hemispheric preponderance in categorical and coordinate visual processes. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1215-1225.
51. Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. I. Pick, Jr., & E. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
52. Postma, A., & De Haan, E. H. F. (1996). What was where? Memory for object locations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 178-199.
53. Postma, A., & Laeng, B. (2006). New insight in categorical and coordinate processing of spatial relations. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1515-1518.
54. Presson, C. C., De Lange, N. Z., & Hazelrigg, M. D. (1989). Orientation specificity in spatial memory: What makes a path different from a map of the path? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 887-889.
55. Presson, C. C., & Hazelrigg, M. D. (1984). Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 716-722.
56. Rizzolatti, G., & Matelli, M. (2003). Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research, 153(2), 146-157.
57. Saunders, J. A., & Knill, D. C. (2003). Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 152(3), 341-352.
58. Saunders, J. A., & Knill, D. C. (2004). Visual feedback control of hand movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(13), 3223-3234.
59. Saunders, J., & Knill, D.C.(2005). Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research, 162(4), 458-473.
60. Schenk, T. (2006). An allocentric rather than perceptual deficit in patient D. F. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1369-1370.
61. Schenk, T., & McIntosh, R. D. (2010). Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action? Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 52-78.
62. Sergent, J. (1991). Judgements of relative position and distance on representations of spatial relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 91, 762-780.
63. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102-106.
64. Sterken, Y., Postma, A., de Haan, E. H. F., & Dingemans, A. (1999). Egocentric and exocentric spatial judgements of visual displacement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A(4), 1047-1055.
65. Thaler, L., & Todd, J. T. (2009). The use of head/eye-centered, hand-centered and allocentric representations for visually guided hand movements and perceptual judgements. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1227-1244.
66. Trojano, L., Conson, M., Maffei, R., & Grossi, D. (2006). Categorical and coordinate spatial processing in the imagery domain investigated by rTMS. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1569-1574.
67. Trojano, L., Grossi, D., Linden, D. E., Formisano, E., Goebel, R., Cirillo, S., et al. (2002). Coordinate and categorical judgements in spatial imagery. An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1666-1674.
68. Vallar, G., Lobel, E., Galati, G., Berthoz, A., Pizzamiglio, L., & Le Bihan, D. (1999). A fronto-parietal system for computing the egocentric spatial frame of reference in humans. Experimental Brain Research, 124, 281-286.
69. van Asselen, M., Kessels, R. P. C., Kappelle, L. J., Neggers, S. F. W., Frijns, C. J. M., & Postma, A. (2006). Neural correlates of human way finding in stroke patients. Brain Research, 1067, 229-238.
70. Westwood, D. A., Heath, M., & Roy, E. A. (2000). The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 134(4), 456-463.
71. Zaehle, T., Jordan, K., Wüstenberg, T., Baudewig, J., Dechent, P., & Mast, F. W. (2007). The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference. Brain Research, 1137(1), 92-103.