Hemispheric preponderance in categorical and coordinate visual processes

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 37, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 1215-1225

  Parrot, Maryse ^a,b   Doyon, Bernard ^b   Démonet, Jean François ^b   Cardebat, Dominique ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Brain lateralization; Neuropsychology; Task difficulty; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COORDINATION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CONCEPT FORMATION; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0032824449     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00030-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bruyer R., Scailquin J-C., Coibion P. Dissociation between categorical and coordination spatial computations: modulation by cerebral hemispheres, tasks properties, mode of response, and age. Brain and Cognition. 33:1997;245-277.
2. Burgund E.D., Marsolek C.J. Letter-case specific priming in the right cerebral hemisphere with a form-specific perceptual identification task. Brain and Cognition. 35:1997;239-258.
3. Cowin E., Hellige J.B. Categorical versus coordinate spatial processing: effects of blurring and hemispheric asymmetry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 6:1994;156-164.
4. Dunn J.C., Kirsner K. Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principle of reversed association. Psychological Review. 95:1988;91-101.
5. Hellige J.B., Michimata C. Categorization versus distance: hemispheric differences for processing spatial information. Memory and Cognition. 17:1989;770-776.
6. Jacobs R.A., Kosslyn S.M. Encoding shape and spatial relations: the role of receptive field size in coordinating complementary representations. Cognitive Science. 18:1994;361-386.
7. Koenig O., Reiss L.P., Kosslyn S.M. The development of spatial relation representations: evidence from studies of cerebral lateralization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 50:1990;119-130.
8. Kosslyn S.M. Seeing and imagining in the central hemispheres: a computational approach. Psychological Review. 94:1987;148-175.
9. Kosslyn S.M., Koenig O., Barrett A., Cave C.B., Tang J., Gabrieli J.D.E. Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15:1989;723-735.
10. Kosslyn S.M., Koenig O. Wet mind: The new cognitive neuroscience. 1992;The Free Press, New York.
11. Kosslyn S.M. Image and Brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. 1994;MIT Press, Cambridge.
12. Kosslyn S.M., Thompson W.L., Gitelman D.R., Alpert N.M. PET studies of categorical and coordinate spatial relations encoding. NeuroImage. 7:1998;S812.
13. Laeng B., Peters M. Cerebral lateralization for the processing of spatial coordinates and categories in left-and right-handers. Neuropsychologia. 33:1995;421-439.
14. Laeng B. Lateralization of categorical and coordinate spatial functions: a study of unilateral stroke patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 6:1994;189-203.
15. Marsolek C.J., Kosslyn S.M., Squire L.R. Form-specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphere. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 18:1992;492-508.
16. Marsolek C.J. Abstract-visual-form representations in the left cerebral hemisphere. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21:1995;375-386.
17. Marsolek C.J., Schacter D.L., Nicholas C.D. Form-specific visual priming for new associations in the right cerebral hemisphere. Memory and Cognition. 24:1996;539-556.
18. Mesulam M.M. From sensation to cognition. Brain. 121:1998;1013-1052.
19. Michimata C. Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in vision and visual imagery. Brain and Cognition. 33:1997;370-387.
20. Mishkin M., Ungerleider L.G., Macko K. Object vision and spatial vision: Two Cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences. 6:1983;414-417.
21. Parrot M., Doyon B., Cardebat D. Hemispheric specialization for coordinate versus categorical spatial processing: an ERP study. NeuroImage. 7:1998;S332.
22. Rybash J., Hoyer W. Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial representations: a reappraisal. Memory and Cognition. 20:1992;271-276.
23. Sergent J. Judgments of relative position and distance on representations of spatial relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 91:1991;762-780.
24. Sergent J. Processing of spatial relations within and between the disconnected cerebral hemispheres. Brain. 114:1991;1025-1043.
25. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. Ingle D.J., Goodale M.A., Mansfield R.J.W. Analysis of visual behavior. 1982;549-586 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.