Does undergraduate curriculum design make a difference to readiness to practice as a junior doctor?

Medical Teacher

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 459-467

  Bleakley, Alan ^a   Brennan, Nicola ^a  

^a ROYAL CORNWALL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CURRICULUM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COHORT STUDIES; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 79957627291     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.540267     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bleakley A. 1999. From reflective practice to holistic reflexivity. Stud High Educ 24:315-330.
2. Bleakley A. 2006. Broadening conceptions of learning in medical education: The message from teamworking. Med Educ 40:150-157.
3. Bleakley A. 2010. Blunting Occam's Razor: Medical education needs powerful and complex learning theories. J Eval Clin Pract 16:849-855.
4. Bleakley A, Bligh J. 2008. Students learning from patients: Let's get real in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 13:89-107.
5. Bleakley A, Bligh J, Brice J. 2011. Medical education for the future: Identity, power and location. New York: Springer (in press).
6. Bligh J, Bleakley A. 2006. Distributing menus to hungry learners: Can learning by simulation become simulation of learning? Med Teach 28:606-613. (Pubitemid 46978511)
7. Brennan N, Corrigan O, Allard J, Archer J, Barnes R, Bleakley A, Collett T, Regan de Bere S. 2010. The transition from medical student to junior doctor: Today's experiences of tomorrow's doctors. Med Educ 44:449-458.
8. Cave J, Goldacre M, Lambert T, Woolf K, Jones A, Dacre J. 2007. Newly qualified doctors' views about whether their medical; school had trained them well: Questionaire surveys. Med Educ 7:38.
9. Clack GB. 1994. Medical graduates evaluate the effectiveness of their education. Med Educ 28:418-431. (Pubitemid 24334743)
10. Engeström Y. 2008. From teams to knots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Eva K, Regehr G. 2007. Knowing when to look it up: A new conception of self-assessment ability. Acad Med 82(Suppl.):581-584.
12. General Medical Council 2007. The new doctor. London: GMC.
13. General Medical Council 2009. Tomorrow's doctors. London: GMC.
14. Goldacre MJ, Lambert T, Evans J, Turner G. 2003. Preregistration house officers' views on whether their experience at medical school prepared them well for their jobs: National questionnaire survey. BMJ 326:1011-1012. (Pubitemid 36566859)
15. Gordon MJ. 1991. A review of the validity and accuracy of self assessments in health professional training. Acad Med 66:762-769.
16. Groopman J. 2007. How doctors think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Illing J, Morrow G, Kergon C, Burford B, Spencer J, Peile E, Davies C, Baldauf B, Allen M, Johnson N, et al. 2008. How prepared are medical graduates to begin practice?: A comparison of three diverse UK medical schools. Final Report for the GMC Education Committee. General Medical Council/Northern Deanery.
18. Jonassen DH, Land SM, editors. 2000. Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Jones A, McArdle P, O'Neill P. 2002. Perceptions of how well graduates are prepared for the role of pre-registration house officer: A comparison of outcomes from a traditional and an integrated PBL curriculum. Med Educ 36:16-25. (Pubitemid 34088316)
20. Knight L, Mattick K. 2006. When I first came here, I thought medicine was black and white: Making sense of medical students ways of knowing. Soc Sci Med 63:1084-1096.
21. Ludmerer K. 1999. Time to heal: American medical education from the turn of the century to the era of managed care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Modernising Medical Careers 2005. Operational framework for foundation training. London: The Stationery Office.
23. Montgomery K. 2006. How doctors think: Clinical judgement and the practice of medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D. 2002. Comparison between medical students' experience, confidence and competence. Med Educ 36:534-539. (Pubitemid 34595659)
25. O'Neill P, Jones A, Willis S, McArdle P. 2003. Does a new undergraduate curriculum based on Tomorrow's Doctors prepare house officers better for their first post? A qualitative study of the views of pre-registration house officers using critical incidents. Med Educ 37:1100-1108. (Pubitemid 38021374)
26. Paice E, Rutter H, Wetherell M, Winder B, McManus IC. 2002. Stressful incidents, stress and coping strategies in the pre-registration house officer year. Med Educ 36:56-65. (Pubitemid 34088321)
27. Pearson SA, Rolfe I, Ringland C, Kay-Lambkin F. 2002. A comparison of practice outcomes of graduates from traditional and non-traditional medical schools in Australia. Med Educ 36:985-991. (Pubitemid 35286323)
28. Pinar WF. 2004. What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Pinar WF. 2006. The synoptic text today and other essays: Curriculum development after the reconceptualization. New York: Peter Lang.
30. Roter DL, Hall JA. 2006. Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: Improving communication in medical visits. London: Praeger.
31. Tooke J. 2007. Aspiring to excellence: Findings and recommendations of the independent inquiry into modernising medical careers. London: Aldridge Press.
32. Watmough S, Garden A, Taylor D. 2006a. Pre-registration house officers' views on studying under a reformed medical curriculum in the UK. Med Educ 40:893-899. (Pubitemid 44272764)
33. Watmough S, Garden A, Taylor D. 2006b. Does a new integrated PBL curriculum with specific communication skills classes produce Pre- Registration House Officers (PRHOs) with improved communication skills? Med Teach 28:264-269. (Pubitemid 43840696)
34. Watmough S, Taylor D, Garden A. 2006. Educational supervisors evaluate the preparedness of graduates from a reformed UK curriculum to work as pre-registration house officers (PRHOs): A qualitative study. Med Educ 40:995-1001. (Pubitemid 44434835)
35. Wenger E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Willis S, Jones A, McArdle P, O'Neill PA. 2003. A qualitative study of the attitudes to teamwork of graduates from a traditional and an integrated undergraduate medical course. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 8:139-148. (Pubitemid 38987548)