Pre-registration house officers' views on studying under a reformed medical curriculum in the UK

Medical Education

Volumn 40, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 893-899

  Watmough, Simon ^a   Garden, Anne ^a   Taylor, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

*Attitude of health personnel; *Curriculum; *Education, medical, undergraduate; England; Female; Humans; Male; Medical staff, hospital *psychology; Multicentre study publication type

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; COMMUNITY CARE; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; REGISTER; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING;

EID: 33747722055     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02545.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors. London: GMC 1993.
2. Bligh J, Parsell G. The changing context of medical education. Postgrad Med J 1995;71:397-403.
3. Bligh J. Identifying the core curriculum: the Liverpool approach. Med Teacher 1995;17:383-90.
4. Wood D. Evaluating the outcomes of undergraduate medical education. Med Educ 2003;37:580-1.
5. Bradley J, Bligh J. One year's experience with a clinical skills resource centre. Med Educ 1999;33:114-20.
6. Morgan D. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. London: Sage 1997;1-17.
7. Norris N. Error, bias and validity in qualitative research. Educational Action Res 1997;5:172.
8. General Medical Council. The New Doctor. London: GMC 1997.
9. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, eds. Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge 1994;173-94.
10. Frankland J, Bloor M. Some issues arising in the systematic analysis of focus group materials. In: Barbour RS, Kitzinger JK, eds. Developing Focus Group Research. Politics, Theory and Practice. London: Sage 2001;144-55.
11. Matthew B, Miles A, Huberman M. Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage 1994;50-89.
12. Krueger RA. Analysing and Reporting Focus Group Results. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage 1997;19-52.
13. Worthen B, Sanders J, Fitzpatrick J. Program Evaluation. Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Longman 1997;371-406.
14. Agar M, Macdonald J. Focus groups and ethnography. Hum Organisation 1995;54:78-86.
15. Calman KC, Donaldson M. The pre-registration house year: a critical incident study. Med Educ 1991;25:51-9.
16. Lemp H, Cochrane M, Seabrook M, Rees J. Impact of educational preparation on medical students in transition from final year to PRHO year; a qualitative evaluation of final year training following the introduction of a new year 5 in a London medical school. Med Teacher 2004;26:276-8.
17. Prince KJ, van Mameren H, Hylkema N, Drukker J, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP. Does problem-based learning lead to deficiencies in basic science knowledge? An empirical case study on anatomy. Medical Educ 2003;37;15-21.
18. Prince KJ, van Mameren H, Scherpbier AJ, Hylkema N, Drukker J, van der Vleuten CP. Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy? Med Educ 2005;39:326-32.
19. Antepohl W, Domeij E, Forsberg P, Ludvigsson J. A follow-up of medical graduates of a problem-based learning curriculum. Med Educ 2003;37:155-62.
20. McKeown PP, Heylings DJ, Stevenson M, McKelvey KJ, Nixon JR, McCluskey DR. The impact of curricular change on medical students' knowledge of anatomy. Med Educ 2003;37:954-61.
21. Clack GB. Medical graduates evaluate the effectiveness of their undergraduate medical education. Med Educ 1994;28:418-31.
22. Rudland JR, Rennie SC. The determination of the relevance of basic sciences learning objectives to clinical practice using a questionnaire survey. Med Educ 2003;37:962-5.
23. Leinster S. Standards in medical education in the European Union. Medical Teacher 2003;5:507-9.
24. Kaufman DM, Mann K. Achievements of students in a conventional and problem-based learning curriculum. Adv Health Sci Educ 1999;4:245-60.
25. Norman G. Beyond PBL. Adv Health Sci Educ 2004;9:257-60.
26. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors (2003). London: GMC 2003.
27. Department of Health. Medical Schools: Delivering the Doctors of the Future. London: The Stationery Office 2004.
28. Department of Health. Modernising Medical Careers: the Next Steps. London: The Stationery Office 2004.
29. Department of Health. Modernising Medical Careers. London: The Stationery Office 2003.
30. Kitzinger J. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995;311:299-302.