Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy

Research Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 748-761

  Giuliani, Elisa ^a,b   Morrison, Andrea ^c,d   Pietrobelli, Carlo ^e,f   Rabellotti, Roberta ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^e ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^f INTER AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN PIEDMONT   (Italy)

Author keywords

Academic researchers; Innovation system; University industry linkages; Wine sector

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING; INNOVATION;

ACADEMIC RESEARCHERS; ACADEMIC SYSTEM; EMPIRICAL FINDINGS; INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS; INNOVATION SYSTEM; PRODUCING AREAS; UNIVERSITY INDUSTRIES; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY LINKAGES;

WINE;

EID: 79957519377     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson, K., Norman, D., Wittwer, G., 2003. Globalisation of the World's Wine Markets. The World Economy 26 (5), 659-687. (Pubitemid 36901490)
2. AWBC, 2009. Wine facts, Australian Wine and Brandy Corporation.
3. Aylward, D.K., 2003. A documentary of innovation support among new world wine industries. Journal of Wine Research 14 (1), 31-43. (Pubitemid 41075767)
4. Bekkers, R.B., Freitas Bodas, I.M., 2008. Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy 37, 1837-1853.
5. Bell, M., Giuliani, E., 2007. Catching up in the global wine industry: Innovation systems, cluster knowledge networks and firm-level capabilities in Italy and Chile. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 3 (2/3), 197-223.
6. Bercovitz, J., Feldman, M., Feller, I., Burton, R., 2001. Organizational structure as a determinant of academic patent and licesing behaviour: An exploratory study of Duke, John Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State University, Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 21-35. (Pubitemid 33809463)
7. Bercovitz, J., Feldman, M., 2008. Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science 19 (1), 69-89.
8. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E.G., Causino, N., Seashore Louis, K., 1996. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. The New England Journal of Medicine 335(23), 1734-1739. (Pubitemid 26399349)
9. Bonaccorsi, A., Piccaluga, A., 1994. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships. R & D Management 24 (3), 229-247.
10. Boardman, P.G., 2009. Government centrality to university-industry interactions: University research centers and the university involvement of academic researchers. Research Policy 38, 1505-1516.
11. Boardman, P.G., Ponomariov, B.L., 2009. University researchers working with private companies. Technovation 29, 142-153.
12. Breschi S., Lissoni F., Montobbio F., 2008. University patenting and scientific productivity. Aquantitative study of Italian academic inventors. European Management Review. Journal of European Academy of Management 5(2), 91-109.
13. Buttel, F.H., Goldberger, J.R., 2002. Gender and agricultural science: Evidence from two surveys of land-grant scientists. Rural Sociology 67 (1), 24-45. (Pubitemid 34254201)
14. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2002. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R & D. Management Science 48 (1), 1-23. (Pubitemid 34434352)
15. Cusmano, L., Morrison, A., Rabellotti, R., 2009. Catching up Trajectories in the Wine Sector: A comparative study of Chile, Italy and South Africa, American Association of Wine Economists, no. 34, March.
16. D'Este, P., Fontana, R., 2007. What drives the emergence of entrepreneurial academics? A study on collaborative research partnerships in the UK. Research Evaluation 16 (4), 257-270.
17. D'Este, P., Patel, P., 2007. University-Industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy 36 (9), 1295-1313. (Pubitemid 47615127)
18. DiMaggio, P., Powell, W., 1983. The Iron Cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2), 147-160.
19. Etzkowitz, H., 1998. The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkage. Research Policy 27, 823-833. (Pubitemid 128419003)
20. Etzkowitz, H., Leyedesdorff, L., 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and 'mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industries- governments relations. Research Policy 39, 109-123.
21. Faulkner, W., 1994. Conceptualizing knowledge used in innovation: A second look at the science-technology distinction and industrial innovation. Science, Technology, & Human Values 19 (4), 425-458.
22. Feldman, M.P., Desrochers, P., 2004. Truth for its own sake: Academic culture and technology transfer at Johns Hopkins University, Minerva 42, 105-126.
23. Geuna, A., 2001. The changing rationale for European university research funding: Are there negative unintended consequences? Journal of Economic Issues 35 (3), 607-632.
24. Giuliani, E., Arza, V., 2009. What drives the formation of 'valuable' universityindustry linkages? Insights from the wine industry. Research Policy 38, 906-921.
25. Giuliani, E., Rabellotti, R. Academic and I-U networks in the wine industry: A comparative Analysis of Italy, Chile and South Africa. In: Giuliani E., Morrison A., Rabellotti R. (Eds.), The changing geography of wine production: How New World countries catch up with world leaders. The Role of Science and Innovation, Edward Elgar, Chelthenam, in press.
26. Gulbrandsen, M., Smeby, J.-C., 2005. Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research Policy 34 (6), 932-950. (Pubitemid 41078309)
27. Ibarra, H., 1993. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal 36 (3), 471-501.
28. ISTAT, 2009. Datawarehouse commercio estero, Istituto di Statistica, Rome.
29. Jensen, R., Thursby, M., 2001. Patent licensing and the research university. NBER WP 10758.
30. Landry, R., Amara, N., Ouimet, M., 2007. Determinants of knowledge transfer: Evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering. Journal of Technology Transfer 32 (6), 561-592.
31. Levin, S., Stephan, P., 1991. Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. The American Economic Review 81, 114-132.
32. van Looy, B., Debackere, K., Andries, P., 2003. Policies to stimulate regional innovation capabilities via university-industry collaboration: An analysis and an assessment. R & D Management 33 (2), 209-229. (Pubitemid 36539893)
33. Lorentzen, J., 2009. The geography of innovation in South Africa: A first cut. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation, and Development 2 (3), 210-229.
34. Louis, K.S., Jones, L.M., Anderson, M.S., Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E.G., 2001. Entrepreneurship, secrecy and productivity: A comparison of clinical and nonclinical life sciences faculty. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (3), 233-245. (Pubitemid 33809477)
35. Klofsten, M., Jones-Evans, D., 2000. Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe: The case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics 14, 299-309.
36. Marsden, P.V., 2005. Recent developments in network measurement'. In: Carrington, P.J., Scott, J., Wasserman, S. (Eds.), Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 8-30.
37. Matasar, A.B., 2006.Women of Wine. The Rise of Women in the Global Wine Industry. University of California Press, Berkeley.
38. Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R.R., 2007. Public research institutions and economic catch-up. Research Policy 26, 1512-1528. (Pubitemid 350101733)
39. Moguillansky, G., Salas, J.C., Cares, G., 2006. Innovacion en la industria del Vino. Corfo, Santiago de Chile.
40. Mora Valentin, E.M., 2002. A Theoretical review of co-operative relationships between firms and universities. Science and Public Policy 29 (1), 37-46.
41. Morrison, A., Rabellotti, R., 2007. The role of research in wine: The emergence of a regional research area in an Italian wine production system. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 3 (2/3), 155-178.
42. Moulton, B.R., 1990. Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates. Journal of Econometrics 32, 385-397.
43. Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., Sampat, B., Ziedonis, A., 2001. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy 30 (1), 99-119. (Pubitemid 33676869)
44. O'Shea, R., Allen, T., Chevalier, A., Roche, F., 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy 34 (7), 994-1009. (Pubitemid 41260498)
45. Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F., Powell, W.W., 2002. A comparison of U.S. and european university-industry relations in the life sciences. Management Science 48 (1), 24-43. (Pubitemid 34434353)
46. Owen-Smith, J., 2005. Trends and transitions in the institutional environment for public and private science. Higher Education 49 (1), 91-117. (Pubitemid 40553864)
47. Perkmann, M., Walsh, K., 2007. University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 9 (4), 259-280.
48. Santoro, M.D., Chakrabarti, A.K., 2002. Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy 31 (7), 1163-1180.
49. Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M.M., Frohlich, J., 2002. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy 31 (3), 303-328.
50. Van Rijnsoever, F.J., Hessels, L.K., Vandeberg, R.L.J., 2008. A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy 37, 1255-1266.
51. Santos Silva, J.M.C., Tenreyro, S., 2006. The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4), 641-658. (Pubitemid 44728714)
52. Velho, L., Saenz, W.T., 2002. R & D in the public and private sector in Brazil: Complements or substitute? UNU/INTECH Discussion Papers, pp. 1564-8370.
53. Vink, N., Williams, G., Kirsten, J., 2004. South Africa. In: Anderson, K. (Ed.), The World Wine Markets: Globalization at Work. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 3-37.
54. Wasserman, S., Faust, K., 1994. Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
55. Winetech, 2006. Annual report. www.winetech.co.za.
56. Whittington, K.B., Smith-Doerr, L., 2008. Women inventors in context. Gender and Society 22 (2), 194-218.
57. Zucker, L., Durby, M., 1996. Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93 (23), 12709-12716. (Pubitemid 26382707)