Trends and transitions in the institutional environment for public and private science

Higher Education

Volumn 49, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 91-117

  Owen Smith, Jason ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Institutional change; Organizational environment; Partly of license; Research communication; University

Indexed keywords

EID: 17544368885     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-004-2916-4     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Agrawal, A. and Henderson, R. (2002). 'Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT', Management Science 48, 44-60.
2. Arora, A. (1996). 'Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A note', Economics Letters 50, 51-55.
3. Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. (1990). 'Complementarity and external linkages - the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology', Journal of Industrial Economics 38, 361-379.
4. Association of University Techology Managers. (2000). 'Licensing Survey, FY 2000: Full Report', Association of University Technology Managers.
5. Athey, S. and Stern, S. (1998). 'Am Empirical Framework for Testing Theories about Complementarity in Organizational Design', NBER Working Paper #6600.
6. Campbell, E.G., Weissman, J.S., Causino, N. and Blumenthal, D. (2000). 'Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials', Research Policy 29, 303-312.
7. Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford; New York: Published for the IAU Press by Pergamon Press.
8. Clemens, E.S. and Cook, J.M. (1999). 'Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change', Annual Review of Sociology 25, 441-466.
9. Dasgupta, P. and David, P.A. (1987). 'Information disclosure and the economics of science and technology', in Feiwel, G.R. (ed.), Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory. New York: University Press, pp. 659-589.
10. Dasgupta, P. and David, P.A. (1994). 'Toward a new economics of science', Research Policy 23, 487-521.
11. Desruisseaux, P. (2000). 'Universities venture into venture capitalism', Chronicle of Higher Education, 5/26/2000, A44.
12. Dimaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983). 'The iron cage revisited - Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields', American Sociological Review 48, 147-160.
13. Eisenberg, R.S. (2003), 'Science and the law - Patent swords and shields', Science 299, 1018-1019.
14. England, P. (1992). Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
15. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). 'Research groups as 'quasi-firms': the invention of the entrepreneurial university', Research Policy 32, 109-121.
16. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1998). 'The endless transition: A 'triple helix' of university-industry-government relations', Minerva 36, 203-208.
17. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A. and Healey, P. (1998). Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
18. Geiger, R.L. (1993). Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities since World War II. NY: Oxford University Press.
19. Gibbons, M., Nowotny, H., Limoges, C., Trow, M., Schwartzman, S. and Scott, P. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.
20. Heller, M.A. and Eisenberg, R.S. (1998). 'Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research', Science 280, 698-701.
21. Hicks, D., Breitzman, T., Olivastro, D. and Hamilton, K. (2001). 'The changing composition of innovative activity in the US - a portrait based on patent analysis', Research Policy 30, 681-703.
22. Jaffe, A.B. and Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, Citations, and Innovation: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Kennedy, D. (2003). 'Industry and academia in transition', Science 302, 1293-1293.
24. Kerr, C. (2002). 'Shockwave II: An Introduction to the 21st Century', in Brint, S.G. (ed.), The Future of the City of Intellect. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 1-19.
25. Kleinman, D.L. (1995). Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham: Duke University Press.
26. Kleinman, D.L. (1998). 'Untangling context: Understanding a university laboratory in the commercial world', Science, Technology, and Human Values 23, 285-314.
27. Kleinman, D.L. and Vallas, S.P. (2001). 'Science, capitalism, and the rise of the 'knowledge worker': The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States', Theory and Society 30, 451-492.
28. Lee, Y.S. (1994). 'Technology-transfer and public-policy in an age of global economic competition - introduction to the symposium', Policy Studies Journal 22, 260-266.
29. Mansfield, E. (1991). 'Academic research and industrial-innovation', Research Policy 20, 1-12.
30. Mansfield, E. and Lee, J.Y. (1996). 'The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support', Research Policy 25, 1047-1058.
31. McSherry, C. (2001). Who Owns Academic Work?: Battling for Control of Intellectual Property. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
32. Merton, R.K. (1968). 'The Matthew effect in science', Science 159, 56.
33. Merton, R.K. (1988). 'The Matthew effect in science 2. cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property', Isis 79, 606-623.
34. Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977). 'Institutionalized organizations - formal-structure as myth and ceremony', American Journal of Sociology 83, 340-363.
35. Morrill, C. (2004). 'Institutional change through interstitial emergence: The growth of alternative dispute resolution in american Law, 1965-1995', Forthcoming in Powell, W.W. and Jones, D.L. (eds.), How Institutions Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Mowery, D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat, B.N, and Ziedonis, A.A. (2001). 'The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980', Research Policy 30, 99-119.
37. Myers, G. (1995). 'From discovery to invention - the writing and rewriting of 2 patents', Social Studies of Science 25, 57-105.
38. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
39. Neuer, A. (1995). 'Academic technology transfer offices evolve into marketing units', The Scientist 9, 1-4.
40. Owen-Smith, J. (2003). 'From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities', Research Policy 32, 1081-1104.
41. Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W.W. (2001a). 'Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences', The Transformation of Work, a special issue of Research in the Sociology of Work 10, 109-140.
42. Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W.W. (2001b). 'To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success in academic patenting', Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 99-114.
43. Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F. and Powell, W.W. (2002). 'A comparison of US and European university-industry relations in the life sciences', Management Science 48, 24-43.
44. Packer, K. and Webster, A. (1996). 'Patenting culture in science: Reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility', Science, Technology, and Human Values 21, 227-253.
45. Powell, W.W. and Owen-Smith, J. (1998). 'Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17, 253-277.
46. Powell, W.W. and Owen-Smith, J. (2002). 'The new world of knowledge production in the life sciences', in Brint, S.G. (ed.) The Future of the City of Intellect. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 107-132.
47. Rip, A. (1986). 'Mobilizing resources through texts', in Callon, M. (ed.), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: The Macmillan Press.
48. Rosenberg, N. (2000). Schumpeter and the Endogeneity of Technology: Some American Perspectives. London; New York: Routledge.
49. Rosenberg, N. and Nelson, R.R. (1994). 'American universities and technical advance in industry', Research Policy 23, 323-348.
50. Sampat, B.N. and Nelson, R.R. (1999). The Emergence and Standardization of University Technology Transfer Offices: A Case Study of Institutional Change. New York: Columbia University.
51. Scott, W.R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P.J. and Caronna, C.A. (2000). Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: from Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Sewell, W.H. (1992). 'A theory of structure - duality, agency, and transformation', American Journal of Sociology 98, 1-29.
53. Sine, W.D., Scott, S. and Di Gregorio, D. (2003). 'The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions', Management Science 49, 478-496.
54. Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (1996). 'The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology', Science, Technology, and Human Values 21, 303-339.
55. Stinchcombe, A.L. (1978). Theoretical Methods in Social History. New York: Academic Press.
56. Thursby, J.G. and Thursby, M.C. (2002). 'Who is selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of growth in university licensing', Management Science 48, 90-104.
57. Zucker, L.G. (1977). 'Role of institutionalization in cultural persistence', American Sociological Review 42, 726-743.