Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?

Research Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1837-1853

  Bekkers, Rudi ^a,b   Bodas Freitas, Isabel Maria ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b Dialogic   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Channels of knowledge transfer; Innovation development; University industry links

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

CHANNELS OF KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS; INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFERS; RELATIVE IMPORTANCES; TRANSFER CHANNELS; UNIVERSITY RESEARCHERS; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY LINKS;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 55549110045     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Agrawal A. University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Review 3 4 (2001) 285-302
2. Balconi M., and Laboranti A. University-industry interactions in applied research: the case of microelectronics. Research Policy 35 (2006) 1616-1630
3. Beise M., and Stahl H. Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Research Policy 28 (1999) 397-422
4. Bekkers R., Gilsing V., and van der Steens M. Determining factors of the effectiveness of IP-based spin-offs: comparing the Netherlands and the US. Journal of Technology Transfer 31 5 (2006) 545-566
5. Belderbos R., Carree M., Lokshin B., and Veugelers R. Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization 22 (2004) 1237-1263
6. Bozeman B. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy 29 (2000) 627-655
7. Brusoni S., Prencipe A., and Pavitt K. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make?. Administrative Science Quarterly 46 4 (2001) 597-621
8. Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., and Walsh J.P. Links and impacts: the influence of Public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48 1 (2002) 1-23
9. Cohendet P., and Meyer-Krahmer F. The theoretical and policy implications of knowledge codification. Research Policy 30 9 (2001) 1563-1591
10. Cohendet P., and Steinmueller W.E. The codification of knowledge: a conceptual and empirical exploration. Industrial and Corporate Change 9 2 (2000) 195-209
11. Colyvas J., Crow M., Gelijns A., Mazzoleni R., Nelson R., Rosenberg N., and Sampat B.N. How do university inventions get into practice?. Management Science 48 1 (2002) 61-72
12. David P.A., and Foray D. Information distribution and the growth of economically valuable knowledge: a rationale for technological infrastructure policies. In: Teubal M., Justman M., and Zuscovitch E. (Eds). Technological Infrastructure Policy: An International Perspective (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
13. D'Este P., and Patel P. University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors determining the variety of university researchers' interactions with industry?. DRUID 10th Anniversary Summer Conference 2005 on Organizations, Networks and Systems. Copenhagen, Denmark, June 27-29 (2005)
14. Fontana R., Geuna A., and Matt M. Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: the importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy 35 (2006) 309-323
15. Granstrand O., Patel P., and Pavitt K. Multi-technology corporations: why they have "distributed" rather than "distinctive core" competencies. California Management Review 39 4 (1997) 8-25
16. Gübeli M.H., and Doloreux D. An empirical study of university spin-off development. European Journal of Innovation Management 8 3 (2005) 269-282
17. Kingsley G., Bozeman B., and Coker K. Technology transfer and absorption: an 'R& D value-mapping' approach to evaluation. Research Policy 25 (1996) 967-995
18. Lam A. Work roles and careers of R&D scientists in network organizations. Industrial Relations 44 (2005) 242-275
19. Lee Y.S. 'Technology transfer' and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy 25 (1996) 843-863
20. Levin R.C. Appropriability, R&D spending and technological performance. The American Economic Review 78 2 (1988) 424-428
21. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy 20 (1991) 1-12
22. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings. Research Policy 26 (1998) 773-776
23. Marsili O. The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries: Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics (2001), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA
24. Marsili O., and Verspagen B. Technology and dynamics of industrial structures. Industrial and Corporate Change 11 4 (2002) 791-815
25. Martinelli A., Meyer M., and von Tunzelmann N. Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. The Journal of Technology Transfer 33 (2008) 259-283
26. McMillan G.S., Narin F., and Deeds D.L. An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology. Research Policy 29 (2000) 1-8
27. Meyer-Krahmer F., and Schmoch U. Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy 27 (1998) 835-851
28. Monjon S., and Waelbroeck P. Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 (2003) 1255-1270
29. Narin F., Hamilton K.S., and Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy 26 (1997) 317-330
30. O'Shea R.P., Allen T.J., Chevalier A., and Roche F. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy 34 (2005) 994-1009
31. Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13 6 (1984) 343-373
32. Salter A.J., and Martin B.R. The economic benefits of publicly funded research: a critical review. Research Policy 30 (2001) 509-539
33. Santoro M.D., and Chakrabarti A.K. Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy 31 (2002) 1163-1180
34. Schartinger D., Rammera C., Fischer M.M., and Fröhlich J. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy 31 (2002) 303-328
35. Swann, G.M.P., 2002. Innovative Businesses and the Science and Technology Base: An Analysis Using CIS3 Data Report for the Department of Trade and Industry. DTI, London, UK.
36. Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., and Armstrong J.S. Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science 48 1 (2002) 138-153