Comparison of novel sensory panel performance evaluation techniques with e-nose analysis integration

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 275-286

  Sipos, László ^a   Kovács, Zoltán ^a   Szöllosi, Dániel ^a   Kókai, Zoltán ^a   Dalmadi, István ^a   Fekete, András ^a  

^a Institute of Entrepreneurship and Innovation   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Black tea; Electronic nose; Multivariate classification statistics; Panel performance; Sensory evaluation

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC NOSE; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; VECTORS;

BLACK TEA; GRAVITY CENTERS; MULTIVARIATE CLASSIFICATION; MULTIVARIATE CLASSIFICATION STATISTIC; PANEL PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCES EVALUATION; RANDOM NUMBERS; SENSORY DATA; SENSORY PANELS;

SENSORY ANALYSIS;

EID: 79956302289     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1391     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ISO 6658:2005 Sensory analysis-Methodology-General guidance.
2. ISO/DIS 11132 Sensory analysis-Methodology-General guidance for monitoring the performance of a quantitative sensory panel.
3. Naes T, Brockhoff P, Tomic O.Statistics for Sensory and Consumer Science.Wiley: Chicester, 2010;11-38.
4. Derndorfer E, Baierl A, Nimmervoll E.A panel performance procedure implemented in R.J. Sens. Stud. 2005;20:217-227.
5. Dijksterhuis GB, Pigott JR.Dynamic method of sensory analysis.Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2000;11:284-290.
6. Dijksterhuis G.Multivariate data analysis in sensory and customer science: an overview of developments.Trends Food Sci. Tech. 1995;6:206-211.
7. Gilbert C. An Overview of Proficiency Testing in Sensory Analysis. Campden & Chorleywood Food Research Association, 2005.
8. Goyal SK, Desphande VA.Comparison of weight assignment procedures in evaluation of environmental impacts.Env. Ass. Rev. 2001;21:553-563.
9. Kermit M, Lengard V. Assessing the performance of a sensory panel-panelist monitoring and tracking, CAMO Process, Ås, 2006 1-12.
10. Kontic B.Why are some experts more credible than others?Env. Ass. Rev. 2000;20:427-434.
11. Noble BF.Strategic environmental assessment quality assurance: evaluating and improving the consistency of judgments in assessment panels.Env. Imp. Ass. Rev. 2004;24:3-25.
12. Arnold GM, Williams AA.The use of generalised Procrustes techniques in sensory analysis. InStatistical Procedures in Food Research, Piggott, JR (ed.).Elsevier Applied Science: London, USA, ISBN 978-1851660322, 1986;233-253.
13. Tomic O, Nilsen A, Martens M, Næs T.Visualization of sensory profiling data for performance monitoring.Food Sci. Technol. 2007;40:262-269
14. Feria-Morales AM.Examining the case of green coffee to illustrate the limitations of grading systems/expert tasters in sensory evaluation for quality control.Food Qual. Prefer. 2002;13:355-367.
15. ISO 13299:2003 Sensory analysis-Methodology-General guidance for establishing a sensory profile.
16. Drobna Z, Wismer WV, Goonewardene LA.Selection of an astringency reference standard for the sensory evaluation of black tea.J. Sens. Stud. 2004;19:119-132.
17. Wang KB, Ruan JY.Analysis of chemical components in green tea in relation with perceived quality, a case study with Longjing teas.Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009;44:2476-2484.
18. Chen C-S, Chan H-C, Chang Y-N, Liu B-L, Chen Y-S.Effects of bacterial strains on sensory quality of pu-erh tea in an improved pile-fermentation process.J. Sensory Stud. 2009;24:534-553.
19. Lee SM, Chung S-J, Lee O-H, Lee H-S, Kim Y-K, Kim K-O.Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability of various green teas.J. Sensory Stud. 2008;23:450-467.
20. Reichelt KV, Peter R, Paetz S, Roloff M, Ley JP, Krammer GE, Engel K-H.Characterization of flavor modulating effects in complex mixtures via high temperature liquid chromatography.J. Agr. Food Chem. 2010;58:458-464.
21. Reichelt KV, Hartmann B, Weber B, Ley JP, Krammer GE, Engel K-H.Identification of bisprenylated benzoic acid derivatives from yerba santa (Eriodictyon ssp.) using sensory-guided fractionation.J. Agr. Food Chem. 2010;58:1850-1859.
22. Mednyánszky Zs, Amtmann M, Korány K.Preliminary results of a recognition method visualizing the aroma and fragrance features.Acta Aliment. 2000;29:1588-2535.
23. Yang Y, Kowalczyk J, Da Costa NC, Trinnaman L.A nonvolatile study of tea: from analytical to sensory, and to effective analytical support. 36th American Chemical Society National Meeting, August 17-21, Philadelphia, 2008; Proceedings id. AGFD 256.
24. Owuor PO, Wachira FN, Ngetich WK.Influence of region of production on relative clonal plain tea quality parameters in Kenya.Food Chem. 2010;119:1168-1174.
25. Owuor PO, Obanda M, Nyirenda HE, Mphangwe NIK, Wright LP. Apostolides Z.The relationship between some chemical parameters and sensory evaluations for plain black tea (Camellia sinensis) produced in Kenya and comparison with similar teas from Malawi and South Africa.Food Chem. 2006;97:644-653.
26. Kovács Z, Szöllosi D, Fekete A.Application of electronic tongue to soya drink discrimination.Prog. Agr. Eng. Sci. 2009;5:75-96.
27. He W, Hu X, Zhao L, Liao X, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Wu J.Evaluation of Chinese tea by the electronic tongue: correlation with sensory properties and classification according to geographical origin and grade level.Food Res. Int. 2009;42:1462-1467.
28. Liu XD, Vanespen P, Adams F, Yan SH, Vanbelle M.Classification of Chinese tea samples according to origin and quality by principal component techniques.Anal. Chim. Acta 1987;200:421-430.
29. Yan SH.Evaluation of the composition and sensory properties of tea using near infrared spectroscopy and principal component analysis.J. Near Infrared Spectros. 2005;13:313-325.
30. Tomlins KI, Gay C.Prediction of quality and origin of black tea and pine resin samples from chromatography and sensory information: evaluation of neural networks.Food Chem. 1994;50:157-165.
31. Bhattacharya N, Tudu B, Jana A, Ghosh D, Bandhopadhyaya R, Saha AB.Illumination heating and physical raking for increasing sensitivity of electronic nose measurements with black tea.Sensor. Actuator. B: Chem. 2008;131:37-42.
32. Lee SM, Lee H-S, Kim K-H, Kim K-O.Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability of decaffeinated green teas.J. Food Sci. 2009;74:135-141.
33. Bhattacharyya N, Bandyopadhyay R, Bhuyan M, Tudu B, Ghosh D, Jana A.Electronic nose for black tea classification and correlation of measurements with "tea taster" marks.IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2008;57:1313-1321.
34. Kollár-Hunek K, Heszberger J, Kókai Z, Láng-Lázi M, Papp E.Testing panel consistency with GCAP method in food profile analysis.J. Chemom. 2008;22:218-226.
35. Horvai Gy, Borosi AP, Héberger K, Kolossváry I, Lengyel A, Paksy L, Rajkó R, Szepesváry P.Chemometrics.Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó Rt, Budapest: Hungary, 2001; ISBN 963 19 2114 X.
36. Berrueta LA, Alonso-Salces RM, Héberger K.Supervised pattern recognition in food analysis.J. Chromatogr. A 2007;1158:196-214.
37. López A, Garcia P, Garrido A.Multivariate characterization of table olives according to their mineral nutrient composition.Food Chem. 2008;106:369-378.
38. Vapnik V.The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory.Springer: New York, 1995.
39. Ivanciuc O.Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Volume 23.Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2007;291-400.
40. Staelin C.Parameter selection for support vector machines. HP Laboratories Israel, Technion City, Israel, 2003;1-4.
41. Héberger K, Kollár-Hunek K.Sum of ranking differences for method discrimination and its validation: comparison of ranks with random numbers.J. Chemometr. 2010; DOI:10.1002/cem.1320.