A panel performance procedure implemented in R

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 217-227

  Derndorfer, Eva ^a   Baierl, Andreas ^b   Nimmervoll, Elisabeth ^b   Sinkovits, Elvira ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES WIENER NEUSTADT   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24644503645     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2005.00021.x     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. ARNOLD, G.M. and WILLIAMS, A.A. 1986. The use of generalized procrustes techniques in sensory analysis. In Statistical Procedures in Food Research (J.R. Piggott, ed.) pp. 233-254, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers LTD, London.
2. CHANLOT, G., DELARUE, J. and SIEFFERMAN, J.M. 2003. Reliability of sensory data when training is limited. Poster presentation at the 5th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, Boston.
3. GOWER, J.C. 1975. Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40, 33-50.
4. KING, M.C., HALL, J. and CLIFF, M.A. 2001. A comparison of methods for evaluating the performance of a trained sensory panel. J. Sens. Stud. 16, 567-582.
5. LYON, D.H., MEENER, J.L., MCEWAN, J.A., METHERINGHAM, T.L.C. and LALLEMAND, M. 2002. Guidelines for the Selection and Training of Assessors for Descriptive Sensory Analysis (CCFRA Guideline No. 37). Campden and Chorleywood Food Research Association Group, Chipping Campden, U.K.
6. PAGES, J. and PÉRINEL, E. 2004. Panel performance and number of evaluations in a descriptive sensory study. J. Sens. Stud. 19, 273-291.
7. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2004. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org (accessed December 10, 2004)
8. SCHLICH, P. 1994. GRAPES: A method and a SAS© program for graphical representations of assessor performances. J. Sens. Stud. 9, 157-169.