Online foreign language interaction: Moving from the periphery to the core of foreign language education?

Language Teaching

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 368-380

  O'Dowd, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956075678     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444810000194     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Audras, I. & T. Chanier (2008). Observation de la construction d'une comṕetence interculturelle dans des groupes exolingues en ligne. Revue Apprentissage des Langues et Syst̀eme d'Information et de Communication (ALSIC) 11, 175-204. http://alsic.revues.org/index865.html.
2. Bax, S. (2003). CALL - past, present and future. System 31.1, 13-28. (Pubitemid 36316552)
3. Belz, J. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology 6.1, 60-81. http://llt.msu.edu/ vol6num1/belz/. (Pubitemid 38817317)
4. Belz, J. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology 7.2, 68-117. http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/BELZ/ default.html.
5. Belz, J. & S. Thorne (eds.) (2006). Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
6. Belz, J. & N. Vyatkina (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked intercultural language study: The case of German modal particles. Canadian Modern Language Review/Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 62.1, 17-48.
7. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
8. Chambers, A. & S. Bax (2006). Making CALL work: Towards normalisation. System 34.4, 465-479. (Pubitemid 44801305)
9. Council of Europe (2001). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Brussels: Council of Europe.
10. Culhane, S. (2006). Virtual acculturation: Ongoing development of an E-homestay platform for SLA and intercultural learning. Presented at the PacCALL 3rd Annual Conference, 16-19 November, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
11. Dooly, M. (2008). Telecollaborative language learning: A guidebook to moderating intercultural collaboration online. Bern: Peter Lang.
12. European Commission (2009). Green paper: Promoting the learning mobility of young people. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/education/ lifelong-learning-policy/doc/ mobility/com329-en.pdf.
13. Furstenberg, G., S. Levet, K. English & K. Maillet (2001). Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The Culture Project. Language Learning & Technology 5.1, 55-102. http://llt.msu.edu/ vol5num1/furstenberg/ default.html. (Pubitemid 38817347)
14. Goodfellow, R. & M-N. Lamy (2009). Introduction: A frame for the discussion of learning cultures. In R. Goodfellow & M-N. Lamy (eds.), Learning cultures in online education (Continuum Studies in Education). London: Continuum, 1-14.
15. Guth, S. & F. Helm (in press). Telecollaboration 2.0: Language and intercultural learning in the 21st century. Bern: Peter Lang.
16. Hanna, B. & J. de Nooy (2009). Learning language and culture via public internet discussion forums. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Hauck, M. (2007). Critical success factors in a TRIDEM exchange. ReCALL 19.2, 202-223.
18. Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Kötter, M. (2003). Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems. Language Learning &Technology 7.2, 145-172. http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/kotter/default.html. (Pubitemid 38817292)
20. Kramsch, C. & S. Thorne (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (eds.), Globalization and language teaching. London: Routledge, 83-100.
21. Lankshear, C. & M. Knobel (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning (2nd edn.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
22. Levy, M. & G. Stockwell (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Little, D. & B. Simpson (2003). European Language Portfolio: The intercultural component and learning how to learn. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
24. O'Dowd, R. (2005). Negotiating sociocultural and institutional contexts: The case of Spanish- American telecollaboration. Language and Intercultural Communication 5.1, 40-57.
25. O'Dowd, R. (2006). Telecollaboration and the development of intercultural communicative competence. Berlin: Langenscheidt.
26. O'Dowd, R. (ed.) (2007). Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
27. O'Dowd, R. & M. Ritter (2006). Understanding and working with 'Failed Communication' in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal 23, 623-642.
28. O'Dowd, R. & P. Ware (2008). Peer feedback on language form in international telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology 12.1, 43-63.
29. O'Rourke, B. (2005). Form-focused interaction in online tandem learning. CALICO Journal 22.3, 433-466.
30. O'Rourke, B. (2007). Models of telecollaboration (1): eTandem. In O'Dowd (ed.), 41-61.
31. Thorne, S. (2006). Pedagogical and praxiological lessons from Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education research. In Belz & Thorne (eds.), 2-30.
32. Thorne, S. (in press). The intercultural turn and language learning in the crucible of New Media. In Guth & Helm (eds.).
33. Ware, P. (2005). 'Missed communication' in online communication: Tensions in fostering successful online interactions. Language Learning & Technology 9.2, 64-89. http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num2/ default.html. (Pubitemid 40902133)
34. Ware, P. & C. Kramsch (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal 89.2, 190-205. (Pubitemid 41664954)
35. Warschauer,M. & M.Ware (2008). Learning, change, and power: Competing discourses of technology and literacy. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear & D. J. Leu (eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 215-240.