Models of Telecollaboration (1): ETandem

Online Intercultural Exchange: An Introduction for Foreign Language Teachers

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 41-61

  O’Rourke, Breffni ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449565673     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Appel, C. (1999) Tandem language learning by e-mail: Some basic principles and a case study (CLCS Occasional Paper no. 54): Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.
2. Appel, C. and Mullen, T. (2000) Pedagogical considerations for a web-based tandem language learning environment. Computers and Education 34, 291-308.
3. Brammerts, H. (1996) Tandem language learning via the Internet and the International E-Mail Tandem Network. In D. Little and H. Brammerts (eds) A guide to language learning in tandem via the internet (pp. 9-22). CLCS Occasional Paper no. 46. Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.
4. Brammerts, H. (2003) Language Learning in Tandem Bibliography. 13 October. On WWW at http://www.slf.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/learning/tanbib.html. Accessed 6.4.07.
5. Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Crystal, D. (2001) Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cziko, G.A. (2004) Electronic Tandem language learning (eTandem): A third approach to second language learning for the 21st century. CALICO Journal 22 (1), 25-39.
8. Gass, S.M. (1998) The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal 82 (3), 299-307.
9. Gass, S.M. and Varonis, E.M. (1985) Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In S.M. Gass and C.G. Madden (eds) Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 149-161). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
10. Holec, H. (1981) Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
11. Kitade, K. (2000) L2 learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: collaborative interaction in internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning 13 (2), 143-166.
12. Little, D. (1991) Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin:Authentik.
13. Little, D. (1997) The role of writing in second language learning: some neo-Vygotskian reflections. In R. Kupetz (ed.) Vom gelenkten zum freien Schreiben im Fremdsprachenunterricht (Vol. 3, pp. 117-128). Frankfurt: Lang.
14. Little, D. (1999a) Developing learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom:a social-interactive view of learning and three fundamental pedagogical principles. Revista Canaria de estudios ingleses (38), 77-88.
15. Little, D. (1999b) Metalinguistic awareness: The cornerstone of learner autonomy. In B. Mißler and U. Multhaup (eds) The Construction of Knowledge, Learner Autonomy and Related Issues in Foreign Language Learning: Essays in Honour of Dieter Wolff (pp. 3-12). Tübingen: Stauffenberg.
16. Little, D., Ushioda, E., Appel, M.C., Moran, J., O’Rourke, B. and Schwienhorst, K. (1999) Evaluating tandem language learning by e-mail: Report on a bilateral project (CLCS Occasional Paper no. 55). Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.
17. Long, M.H. (1983) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics 4 (2), 126-141.
18. Mercer, N. (2000) Words and Minds: How We Use Language To Think Together. London: Routledge.
19. O’Dowd, R. and Ritter, M. (2006) Understanding and working with ‘failed communication’ in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal 23 (3), 623-642.
20. Olson, D.R. (1994a) Literacy and the making of the Western mind. In L. Verhoeven (ed.) Functional Literacy: Theoretical Issues and Educational Implications (pp. 135-150). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Olson, D.R. (1994b) The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Reading and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Olson, D.R. (1995) Writing and the mind. In J.V. Wertsch, P. del Río and A. Alvarez (eds) Sociocultural Studies of Mind (pp. 95-123). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
23. O’Rourke, B. (2002) Metalinguistic knowledge in instructed second language acquisition: a theoretical model and its application in computer-mediated communication. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin.
24. O’Rourke, B. (2005) Form-focused interaction in on-line tandem learning. CALICO Journal 22 (3), 433-466.
25. Ortega, L. (1997) Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction:Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning and Technology 1 (1), 82-93.
26. Pellettieri, J. (2000) Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer and R. Kern (eds) Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Pica, T. (1994) Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about secondlanguage learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning 44 (3), 493-527.
28. Schwienhorst, K. and Borgia, A. (2006) Monitoring bilingualism: Pedagogical implications of the Bilingual Tandem Analyser. CALICO Journal 23 (2), 349-362.
29. Smith, B., Alvarez-Torres, M.J. and Zhao, Y. (2003) Features of CMC technologies and their impact on language learners’ on-line interaction. Computers in Human Behavior 19 (6), 703-729.
30. Swain, M. (1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass and C. Madden (eds) Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
31. Swain, M. (1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (eds) Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics:Studies in Honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: a step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics 16 (3), 371-391.
33. Tudini, V. (2003) Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning and Technology 7 (3), 141-159.
34. Vygotsky, L.S. (1986) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Wolff, J. (1982a) TANDEMadrid - du hilfst mir lernen, ich helfe dir lernen, und so verstehen wir uns besser. Spracharbeit 1, 21-26.
36. Wolff, J. (1982b) Von der wirklichkeitsnahen Organisation des Unterrichts zur lernfördernden Organisation der realen Kommunikation-Tandem-Kurse. Zielsprache Deutsch 3, 21-28.
37. The Tandem Server: http://www.slf.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
38. Service for finding e-tandem partners: http://www.slf.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/email/stats-eng.html