Blended learning in ethics education: A survey of nursing students

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 418-430

  Hsu, Li Ling ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

blended learning; constructivist pedagogy; ethical dilemma; nursing ethics; nursing students; scenario based learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; TAIWAN; TEACHING;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; ETHICS, NURSING; FEMALE; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, NURSING; TAIWAN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955843062     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: 14770989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0969733011398097     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Gorgulu RS and Dinc L. Ethics in Turkish nursing education programs. Nurs Ethics 2007; 14(6): 741-52.
2. Gropelli TM Using active simulation to enhance learning of nursing ethics. J Contin Educ Nurs 2010; 41(3): 104-5.
3. Lewenson SB and Truglio-Londrigan M. Decision-making in nursing: thoughtful approaches for practice. Boston: Jones & Bartlett, 2008.
4. Bransford JD, Sherwood RD, Hasselbring TS,et al.Anchored instruction: why we need it and how technology can help. In: Nix C and Spiro R (eds). Cognition, education and multimedia: exploring ideas in high technology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990, p.115-41.
5. Precel K., Eshet-Alkalai Y. and Alberton Y. Pedagogical and design aspects of a blended learning course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 2009; 10(2): 1-15.
6. Vygotsky LS Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
7. Brown JS, Collins A. and Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 1989; 18(1): 32-42.
8. Dalsgaard C. and Godsk M. Transforming traditional lectures into problem-based blended learning: challenges and experiences. Open Learning 2007; 22(1): 29-42.
9. Garrison DR and Kanuka H. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education 2004; 7: 95-105.
10. Holenko M. and Hoic-Bozic N. Using online discussions in a blended learning course. Ijet 2008; 2(2): 18-23.
11. Pereira J., Pleguezuelos E., Meri A.,et al.Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy. Med Educ 2007; 41: 189-95.
12. Ireland J., Martindale S., Johnson N.,et al.Blended learning in education: effects on knowledge and attitude. British J Nurs 2009; 18(2): 124-30.
13. Stansfield MH, McLellan E. and Connolly TM Enhancing student performance in online learning and traditional face-to-face class delivery. J Information Tech Educ 2004; 3: 173-88.
14. Holland S. Teaching nursing ethics by cases: a personal perspective. Nurs Ethics 1999; 6(5): 434-6.
15. Parsons S., Barker PJ and Armstrong AE The teaching of health care ethics to students of nursing in the UK: a pilot study. Nurs Ethics 2001; 8(1): 45-55.
16. Ketefian S. Legal and ethical issues: ethics content in nursing education. J Pro Nurs 1999; 15(3): 138.
17. Clark R. Accelerating expertise with scenario-based learning. http://www.clarktraining.com/content/articles/ScenarioBasedLearning.pdf (2009, accessed 1 May 2010).
18. Williams B. Do undergraduate paramedic students embrace case based learning using a blended teaching approach? A 3-year review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2009; 25(3): 421-39.
19. Jonassen D., Mayes T. and McAleese R. A manifesto for a constructivist approach to uses of technology in higher education. In: Duffy TM, Lowyck J and Jonassen DH (eds). Designing environments for constructive learning. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1993.
20. Baumgarthner P. Communication and interactions in eLearning. Proceedings of eLearning conference: towards a learning society. Brussels, Belgium, 2005, p.5.
21. Christensen TK Finding the balance: constructivist pedagogy in a blended course. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 2003; 4(3): 235-43.
22. Blankson J. and Kyei-Blankson L. Nontraditional students' perception of a blended course: integrating synchronous online discussion and face-to-face instruction. JI. of Interactive Learning Research 2008; 19(3): 421-38.
23. Dolmans DH, De Grave W., Wolfhagen IH and van der Vleuten CP Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education 2005; 39(7): 732-41.
24. Curran VR, Sharpe D., Forristall J. and Flynn K. Student satisfaction and perceptions of small group process in case-based interprofessional learning. Medical Teacher 2008; 30: 431-3.
25. Dziuban CD, Hartman J., Juge F.,et al.Blended learning: online learning enters the mainstream. In: Bonk CJ and Graham C (eds). Handbook of blended learning environment. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publications, 2005.
26. Garnham C. and Kaleta R. Introduction to hybrid courses. Teach with Tech Today 2002; 8(6). http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm (2002, accessed 5 June 2009).
27. Twigg CA New models for online learning: improving learning and reducing costs. EDUCAUSE review 2003; 38(5): 28-38. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0352.pdf (2003, accessed 1 June 2009).
28. Strickland S. The effectiveness of blended learning environments for the delivery of respiratory care education. J Allied Health 2009; 38(1): 11-16.
29. Westbrook TS Changes in student attitudes toward graduate instruction via web-based delivery. Journal of Continuing Higher Education 1999; 47(2): 32-8.
30. Delialioglu O. and Yildirim Z. Students' perceptions on effective dimensions of interactive learning in a blended learning environment. Educ Tech & Soc 2007; 10(2): 133-46.