Transformational classroom leadership: A novel approach to evaluating classroom performance

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 233-243

  Pounder, James S ^a  

^a HIGHER COLLEGES OF TECHNOLOGY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955568245     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930701292621     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Abrami, P.C., L. Leventhal, and R.P. Perry. 1982. Education seduction. Review of Educational Research 32: 446-464.
2. Aleamoni, L.M. 1989. Typical faculty concerns about evaluation of teaching. In Techniques for Evaluating and Improving Instruction, ed L.M. Aleamoni San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Anastasi, A. 1990. Psychological Testing. New York: Macmillan.
4. Aronson, G., and D.E. Linder. 1965. Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1: 156-171.
5. Bachen, C.M., M.M. Mcloughlin, and S.S. Garcia. 1999. Assessing the role of gender in college students' evaluations of faculty. Communication Education 48, no. 3: 193-210.
6. Barling, J., T. Weber, and E.K. Kelloway. 1996. Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and fiscal outcomes: a field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 827-832.
7. Bass, B.M., and B. Avolio. 2000. MLQ: Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Technical Report, Leader Form, Rater and Scoring Key for MLQ (Form 5x-Short). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
8. Bass, B.M. 1990. From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics 18, no. 3: 19-36.
9. Bass, B.M., and B.J. Avolio. 1990. Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
10. Bass, B.M., and B.J. Avolio. 1995. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual Leader Form, Rater and Scoring Key for MLQ (Form 5x-Short). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
11. Bauer, H.H. 1996. The New Generations: Students Who Don't Study, paper presented at the Technological Society at Risk Symposium. Orlando, FL.
12. Bennett, S.K. 1982. Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology 74: 170-179.
13. Brislin, R.W. 1976. Comparative research methodology: cross cultural studies. International Journal of Psychology 11, no. 3: 215-229.
14. Brislin, R.W. 1993. Understanding Culture's Influence on Behaviour. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
15. Brown, D.L. 1976. Faculty ratings and student grades: a university-wide multiple regression analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 68, no. 5: 573-578.
16. Bycio, P., R.D. Hackett, and J.S. Allen. 1995. Further assessments of Bass's (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology 80: 468-478.
17. Carbonaro, W. 2005. Tracking students' efforts, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education 78, no. 1: 27-49.
18. Cardy, R.L., and G.H. Dobbins. 1986. Affect and appraisal accuracy: liking as an integral dimension in evaluating performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 672-678.
19. Cashin, W. 1990. Students do rate different academic fields differently. In Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues For Improving Practice, eds M. Theall and J. Franklin San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Centra, J.A., and F.R. Creech. 1976. The Relationship Between Student, Teacher, and Course Characteristics and Student Ratings of Teacher Effectiveness, SIR Report No. 4 Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. 24-27.
21. Cheng, Y.C. 1994. Teacher leadership style: a classroom-level study. Journal of Educational Administration 32, no. 3: 54-71.
22. Clark, D. 1993. Teacher Evaluation: A Review of the Literature with Implications for Educators. Paper presented at the Seminar in Elementary Education, California State University at Long Beach, spring.
23. Clayson, D.E. 1999. Students' evaluation of teaching effectiveness: some implications of stability. Journal of Marketing Education 21: 68-75.
24. Cohen, P.A. 1983. Comment on a selective review of the validity of student ratings of teaching. Journal of Higher Education 54: 448-458.
25. Cooper, P., L. Stewart, and W.B. Gudykunst. 1982. Relationship with instructor and other variables influencing student evaluations of instruction. Communication Quarterly 30: 308-315.
26. Cranton, P., and R.A. Smith. 1986. A new look at the effect of course characteristics on student ratings of instruction. American Educational Research Journal Spring: 117-128.
27. Crawford, M., and M. Macleod. 1990. Gender in the college classroom: an assessment of the 'chilly climate' for women. Sex Roles 23: 101-122.
28. Cronbach, L.J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16: 297-334.
29. Cronin, L., and W. Capie. 1986. The Influence of Daily Variation in Teacher Performance on The Reliability and Validity of Assessment Data. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
30. Crumbley, D.L. 1995. The dysfunctional atmosphere of higher education: games professors play. Accounting Perspectives 1, no. 1: 27-33.
31. Crumbley, L., Henry, B.K., and S.H. Kratchman. 2001. Students' perceptions of the evaluation of college teaching. Quality Assurance in Education 9, no. 4: 197-207.
32. D'Apollonia, S., and P.C. Abrami. 1997. Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist 52, no. 11: 1198-1208.
33. Damron, J.C. 1996. Instructor Personality and the Politics of the Classroom. Manuscript. Douglas College, British Columbia.
34. DeBerg, C.L., and J.R. Wilson. 1990. An empirical investigation of the potential confounding variables in student evaluation of teaching. Journal of Accounting Education 8, no. 1: 37-62.
35. Dowell, D.A., and J.A. Neal. 1982. A selective view of the validity of student ratings of teaching. Journal of Higher Education 53: 51-62.
36. Downs, V.C., and T.M. Downs. 1993. An Exploratory and Descriptive Study Identifying Communicative Behaviors Associated with Effective College Teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association. Washington, DC.
37. Emery, C.R. 1995. Student Evaluations of Faculty Performance. Clemson, SC: Clemson University.
38. Eskew, R.K., and R.H. Faley. 1988. Some determinants of student performance in the first college-level financial accounting course. Accounting Review 63, no. 1: 137-147.
39. Feldman, K.A. 1984. Class size and college students' evaluations of teachers and courses: a closer look. Research in Higher Education 21, no. 1: 45-116.
40. Feldman, K.A. 1986. The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: a review and synthesis. Research in Higher Education 24: 139-213.
41. Feldman, K.A. 1993. College students' views of male and female college teachers, part II: Evidence from students' evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education 34: 151-191.
42. Frey, P.W., D.W. Leonard, and W.M. Beatty. 1975. Student ratings of instruction: validation research. American Educational Research Journal 12, no. 4: 435-447.
43. Gellis, Z.D. 2001. Social work perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership in health care. Social Work Research 25, no. 1: 17-25.
44. Goldman, L. 1993. On the erosion of education and the eroding foundations of teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly 20: 57-64.
45. Greenwald, A.G. 1997. Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist 52, no. 11: 1182-1187.
46. Handlin, O. 1996. A career at Harvard. American Scholar 65, no. 5: 47-58.
47. Hocutt, M.O. 1987-1988. De-grading student evaluations: what's wrong with student polls of teaching. Academic QuestionsWinter: 55-64.
48. Holtfreter, R.E. 1991. Student rating biases: are faculty fears justified? The Woman CPA Fall: 59-62.
49. Hoover, N.R. 1991. Transformational and Transactional Leadership: An Empirical Test of a Theory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL: April. ED 331 117.
50. Howell, J.M., and P.J. Frost. 1989. A laboratory study of charismatic leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43: 243-269.
51. Husbands, C.T., and P. Fosh. 1993. Students' evaluation of teaching in higher education: experiences from four European countries and some implications of the practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18, no. 2: 95-114.
52. Jackson, D.L., C.R. Teal, S.J. Raines, and T.R. Nansel. 1999. The dimensions of students' perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement 59, no. 4: 580-596.
53. Johnson, D.L., P. Joyce, and S. Sen. 2002. An analysis of student effort and performance in the finance principles course. Journal of Applied Finance 12, no. 2: 67-72.
54. Johnson, R.L., and V.K. Christian. 1990. Relation of perceived learning and expected grade to rated effectiveness of teaching. Perceptual and Motor Skills 70: 479-482.
55. Joreskog, K.G., and D. Sorbom. 2002. LISREL 8.54. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
56. Kelloway, E.K., and J. Barling. 2000. What we have learned about developing transformational leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 21, no. 7: 355-362.
57. Kelloway, E.K., J. Barling, and J. Helleur. 2000. Enhancing transformational leadership: the role of training and feedback. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 21, no. 3: 145-149.
58. Kierstead, D., P. D'agostino, and H. Dill. 1988. Sex role stereotyping of college professors: bias in student ratings of instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology 80, no. 3: 342-344.
59. Kirkpatrick, S.A., and E.A. Locke. 1996. Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 36-51.
60. Koh, C.H., and T.M. Tan. 1997. Empirical investigation of the factors affecting SET results. International Journal of Educational Management 11, no. 4: 170-178.
61. Langbein, L.I. 1994. The validity of student evaluations of teaching. Political Science and Politics September: 545-553.
62. Liaw, S.H., and K.L. Goh. 2003. Evidence and control of biases in student evaluations of teaching. International Journal of Educational Management 17, no. 1: 37-43.
63. Luechauer, D., and G. Shulman. 2002. Creating empowered learners: a decade trying to practice what we teach. Organization Development Journal 20, no. 3: 42-51.
64. Marsh, H.W., and L.A. Roche. 1997. Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: the critical issues of validity, bias and utility. American Psychologist 52, no. 11: 1187-1197.
65. Marsh, H.W. 1984. Students' evaluation of university teaching: dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology October: 707-754.
66. Marsh, H.W. 1987. Students' evaluations of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. Journal of Educational Research 11: 253-388.
67. Martin, J.R. 1998. Evaluating faculty based on student opinions: problems, implications and recommendations from Deming's theory of management perspective. Issues in Accounting Education 13, no. 4: 1079-1094.
68. McCallum, L.W. 1984. A meta-analysis of course evaluation data and its use in the tenure decision. Research in Higher Education 21: 150-158.
69. McKeachie, W. 1987. Can evaluating instruction improve teaching? In Techniques for Evaluating and Improving Instruction, ed L.M. Aleamoni San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
70. Meredith, G.M. 1984. Diagnostic and summative appraisal ratings of instruction. Psychological Reports 46: 21-22.
71. Michaels, J.W., and T.D. Miethe. 1989. Academic effort and college grades. Social Forces 68, no. 1: 309-319.
72. Naflulin, D., J. Ware, and F. Donnelly. 1973. The Dr Fox lecture: a paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education 48: 630-635.
73. Naser, K., and M.J. Peel. 1998. An exploratory study of the impact of intervening variables on student performance in a principles of accounting course. Accounting Education 7, no. 3: 209-223.
74. Newton, J.D. 1988. Using student evaluation of teaching in administrative control: the validity problem. Journal of Accounting Education 6, no. 1: 1-14.
75. Nunnally, J.C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
76. Perkins, D., D. Gueri, and J. Schleh. 1990. Effects of grading standards information, assigned grade, and grade discrepancies on student evaluations. Psychological Reports 66: 635-642.
77. Peter, J.P. 1979. Reliability: a review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research 17, no. 1: 6-17.
78. Podsakoff, P.M., S.B. Mackenzie, J.Y. Lee, and N.P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 879-903.
79. Podsakoff, P.M., S.B. Mackenzie, R.H. Moorman, and R. Feller. 1990. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. Leadership Quarterly 1, no. 2: 107-42.
80. Powell, R.W. 1977. Grades, learning, and student evaluation of instruction. Research in Higher Education 7: 193-205.
81. Reckers, P.M.J. 1995. Know thy customer. In Change in Accounting Education: A Research Blueprint, ed C.P. Baril St Louis, MO: Federation of Schools of Accountancy.
82. Rubin, R.B. 1981. Ideal traits and terms of address for male and female college professor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41: 966-974.
83. Ryan, J.I., J.A. Anderson, and A.B. Birchler. 1980. Evaluations: the faculty responds. Research in Higher Education 12, no. 4: 317-333.
84. Sacks, P. 1996. Generation X Goes to College. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
85. Sears, S.R., and A.C. Hennessey. 1996. Students' perceived closeness to professors: the effects of school, professor gender and student gender. Sex Roles 35: 651-658.
86. Seldin, P. 1984. Changing Practices in Faculty Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
87. Seldin, P. 1989. How colleges evaluate professors. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin 41, no. 7: 3-7.
88. Seldin, P. 1993. The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. Chronicle of Higher Education 39, no. 46: A40.
89. Simpson, P.M., and J.A. Siguaw. 2000. Student evaluations of teaching: an exploratory study of the faculty response. Journal of Marketing Education 22, no. 3: 199-213.
90. Smith, S.P., and D.P. Kinney. 1992. Age and teaching performance. Journal of Higher Education 63, no. 3: 282-302.
91. Stodolsky, S. 1984. Teacher evaluation: the limits of looking. Educational Researcher November: 11-18.
92. Stratton, W.O. 1990. A model for the assessment of student evaluations of teaching, and the professional development of faculty. Accounting Educators' Journal Summer, 77-101.
93. Stumpf, S.A., and R.D. Freedman. 1979. Expected grade covariation with student ratings of instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 273-302.
94. Toby, S. 1993. Class size and teaching evaluation. Journal of Chemical Education 70, no. 6: 465-466.
95. Walumbwa, F.O., and L.A. Ojode. 2000. Gender Stereotype and Instructors' Leadership Behavior: Transformational and Transactional Leadership. Paper presented at the Midwest Academy of Management Annual Conference at Chicago, 30 March-1 April.
96. Williams, R.L., and L. Clark. 2002. Academic Causal Attribution and Course Outcomes for College Students. ERIC ED 469 337.
97. Williams, W.M., and S.J. Ceci. 1997. 'How'm I doing?' Problems with student ratings of instructors and courses. Change 29, no. 5: 12-23.
98. Wilson, R. 1998. New research casts doubt on value of student evaluations of professors. Chronicle of Higher Education 44, no. 19: A12-A14.
99. Winocur, S., L.G. Schoen, and A.H. Sirowatka. 1989. Perceptions of male and female academics within a teaching context. Research in Higher Education 30: 317-329.
100. Winsor, J.L. 1977. A's, B's, but not C's: a comment. Contemporary Education 48: 82-84.
101. Worthington, A.G., and P.T.P. Wong. 1979. Effects of earned and assigned grades on student evaluations of an instructor. Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 764-75.
102. Yammarino, F.J., and B.J. Bass. 1988. Long Term Forecasting of Transformational Leadership and its Effects Among Naval Officers: Some Preliminary Findings. Binghamton: State University of New York, Centre for Leadership Studies.
103. Yunker, J.A., and J.W. Marlin. 1984. Performance evaluation of college and university faculty: an economic perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly Winter: 9-37.