Students' evaluation of teaching effectiveness: Some implications of stability

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 68-75

  Clayson, Dennis E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844470395     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: 15526550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475399211009     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aronoff, J., and J. P. Wilson. 1985. Personality in the social process. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Baird, J. S. 1987. Perceived learning in relation to student evaluation of university Instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology79 (1): 90-91.
3. Clayson, D. E. 1989. Halo effects in student evaluation of faculty: A question of validity. Marketing: Positioning for the 1990's, Proceedings of the Southern Marketing Association, New Orleans, 271-275.
4. Clayson, D. E., and D. A. Haley. 1990. Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured?Journal of Marketing Education12 (fall): 9-17.
5. Cohen, P. A. 1980. Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis. Research in higher education13 (4): 321-341.
6. Cohen, P. A. 1981. Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research51:281-309.
7. Dowell, D. B., and J. A. Neal. 1982. A selective review of the validity of student ratings of teaching. Journal of Higher Education53 (1): 51-62.
8. Erdle, S., H. G. Murray, and J. P. Rushton. 1985. Personality, classroom behavior, and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology77 (4): 394-407.
9. Feldman, K. A. 1976. Research productivity and scholarly accomplishments: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education 5:243-288.
10. Feldman, K. A. 1983. The seniority and instructional experience of college teachers as related to the evaluations they receive from their students. Research in Higher Education18:3-124.
11. Feldman, K. A. 1989. Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external observers. Research in Higher Education30:137-194.
12. Ferguson, G. A. 1981. Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Finkelstein, M. J. 1995. College faculty as teachers. In The NEA 1995 Almanac of Higher Education. Washington, DC: National Education Association, 33-47.
14. Jöreskog, K. G., and D. Sörbom. 1988. PRELIS. 2d ed.Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
15. Lundsten, N. L. 1986. Student evaluations in a business administration curriculum: A marketing viewpoint. AMA Developments in Marketing Science9:169-173.
16. Marlin, J. W., and J. F. Niss. 1980. End-of-course evaluations as indicators of student learning and instructor effectiveness. Journal of Economic Education (spring): 16-27.
17. Marsh, H. W., and D. Hocevar. 1991. Students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: The stability of mean rating of the same teachers over a 13-year period. Teaching & Teacher Education7 (4): 303-314.
18. Martin, D. G. 1976. Personality: Effective and ineffective. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19. Miron, M. 1988. Students' evaluation of instructors' self-evaluation of university instruction. Higher Education17:175-181.
20. Murray, H., J. P. Rushton, and S. V. Paunonen. 1990. Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. Journal of Educational Psychology82 (2): 250-261.
21. Orsini, J. L. 1988. Halo effects in student evaluations of faculty: A case application. Journal of Marketing Education10 (summer): 38-45.
22. Rodin, M., and B. Rodin. 1972. Student evaluation of teachers. Science177 (29 September): 1164-1166.
23. Seldin, P. 1993. The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. Chronicles of Higher Education, 21 July, A40-A40.
24. Sherman, B. R., and R. T. Blackburn. 1975. Personal characteristics and teaching effectiveness of college faculty. Journal of Educational Psychology 67 (1): 124-131.
25. Sullivan, A. M., and G. R. Skanes. 1974. Validity of student evaluations of teaching and the characteristics of successful instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology66 (4): 584-590.
26. Sykes, C. J. 1988. Prof scam. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.