The dimensions of students' perceptions of teaching effectiveness

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 580-596

  Jackson, Dennis L ^b   Teal, Cayla R ^b   Raines, Susan J ^b   Nansel, Tonja R ^b   Force, Ronald C ^a   Burdsal, Charles A ^b  

^a St Francis Academy   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033467503     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00131649921970035     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abrami, P. C., & d'Apollonia, S. (1991). Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness-generalizability of "N = 1" research: Comment on Marsh (1991). Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 441-415.
2. Aleamoni, L. M. (1981). Student ratings of instruction. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 110-145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
5. Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotic distribution free methods in analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62-83.
6. Burdsal, C. A., & Bardo, J. W. (1986). Measuring student's perceptions of teaching: Dimensions of evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 63-79.
7. Cashin, W. E., & Downey, R. G. (1992). Using global rating items for summative evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 563-572.
8. Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in the behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum.
9. Chou, C. P., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 37-55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
11. Feldman, K. A. (1976). The superior college teacher from the students' view. Research in Higher Education, 5, 243-288.
12. Feldman, K. A. (1988). Effective college teaching from the students' and faculty's view: Matched or mismatched priorities. Research in Higher Education, 28, 291-344.
13. Feldman, K. A. (1997). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 368-395). Bronx, NY: Agathon.
14. Gerbing, D. W., & Hamilton, J. G. (1996). Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 62-72.
15. Gorsuch, R. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Kulik, J. A., & McKeachie, W. J. (1975). The evaluation of teachers in higher education. Review of Research in Education, 3, 214-240.
18. Linn, R. L., Centra, J. A., & Tucker, L. (1975). Between, within, and total group factor analyses of students ratings of instruction. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 177-288.
19. Marsh, H. W. (1982). SEEQ: A reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students' evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Psychology, 52, 77-95.
20. Marsh, H. W. (1991). Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structures. Journal of educational Psychology, 83, 285-296.
21. Marsh, H. W. (1994). Weighting for the right criterie in the Instructional Development and Effectiveness Assessment (IDEA) system: Global and specific ratings of teaching effectiveness and their relation to course objectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 631-648.
22. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling Issues and techniques (pp. 315-353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1984). The factorial invariance of student evaluations of college teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 341-366.
24. McClain, A. L. (1996). Hierarchical analytic methods yielding different perspectives on data dynamics: Aids to interpretation. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 4, pp. 229-240). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
25. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). An evaluation of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247-255.
26. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Romberg, E. (1984). A factor analysis of students' ratings of clinical teaching. Journal of Dental Education, 48, 258-262.
28. Scriven, M. (1981). Summative teacher evaluation. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 244-271). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
30. Thompson, B. (1997). The importance of structure coefficients in structural equation modeling confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 5-19.
31. Waters, M., Kemp, E., & Pucci, A. (1988). High and low faculty evaluations: Descriptions by students. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 203-204.