Reprogramming of trophoblast stem cells into pluripotent stem cells by Oct4

Stem Cells

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 755-763

  Wu, Tong ^a,b   Wang, Haitao ^b   He, Jing ^b   Kang, Lan ^b   Jiang, Yonghua ^b   Liu, Jinchao ^b   Zhang, Yu ^b   Kou, Zhaohui ^b   Liu, Lijun ^c   Zhang, Xuehong ^c   Gao, Shaorong ^b  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (China)

^c LANZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cell fate conversion; Pluripotent stem cells; Reprogramming; Trophoblast stem cells

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; GENOMIC DNA; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG;

ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHIMERA; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DNA METHYLATION; EMBRYO; EPIGENETICS; FEMALE; FIBROBLAST; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOTYPE; GERM LAYER; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; KARYOTYPING; MALE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; STEM CELL; TERATOMA; TROPHOBLAST STEM CELL; WESTERN BLOTTING; X CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALS; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; KARYOTYPING; MICE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; STEM CELLS; TROPHOBLASTS;

MUS;

EID: 79955446417     PISSN: 10665099     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stem.617     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Zernicka-Goetz M, Morris SA, Bruce AW. Making a firm decision: Multifaceted regulation of cell fate in the early mouse embryo. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10:467-477.
2. Guo G, Huss M, Tong GQ et al. Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. Dev Cell 2010;18:675-685.
3. Strumpf D, Mao CA, Yamanaka Y et al. Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate speciication and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst. Development 2005;132:2093-2102. (Pubitemid 40744469)
4. Jedrusik A, Parfitt DE, Guo G et al. Role of Cdx2 and cell polarity in cell allocation and speciication of trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev 2008;22:2692-2706.
5. Nishioka N, Yamamoto S, Kiyonari H et al. Tead4 is required for speciication of trophectoderm in pre-implantation mouse embryos. Mech Dev 2008;125:270-283.
6. Nishioka N, Inoue K, Adachi K et al. The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. Dev Cell 2009;16:398-410.
7. Suwinska A, Czolowska R, Ozdzenski W et al. Blastomeres of the mouse embryo lose totipotency after the ifth cleavage division: Expression of Cdx2 and Oct4 and developmental potential of inner and outer blastomeres of 16- and 32-cell embryos. Dev Biol 2008; 322:133-144.
8. Zernicka-Goetz M. The irst cell-fate decisions in the mouse embryo: Destiny is a matter of both chance and choice. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2006;16:406-412. (Pubitemid 43994448)
9. Avilion AA, Nicolis SK, Pevny LH et al. Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function. Genes Dev 2003;17:126-140. (Pubitemid 36062514)
10. Niwa H, Toyooka Y, Shimosato D et al. Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell 2005;123: 917-929. (Pubitemid 41721036)
11. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981;292:154-156. (Pubitemid 11050741)
12. Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981;78:7634-7638. (Pubitemid 12186197)
13. Tanaka S, Kunath T, Hadjantonakis AK et al. Promotion of trophoblast stem cell proliferation by FGF4. Science 1998;282:2072-2075. (Pubitemid 29001261)
14. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult ibroblast cultures by deined factors. Cell 2006;126:663-676. (Pubitemid 44233629)
15. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2007;448:313-317. (Pubitemid 47080336)
16. Wernig M, Meissner A, Foreman R et al. In vitro reprogramming of ibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 2007;448: 318-324. (Pubitemid 47080337)
17. Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 2007;1:55-70.
18. Kang L, Wang J, Zhang Y et al. iPS cells can support full-term development of tetraploid blastocyst-complemented embryos. Cell Stem Cell 2009;5:135-138.
19. Zhao XY, Li W, Lv Z et al. iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation. Nature 2009;461:86-90.
20. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human ibroblasts by deined factors. Cell 2007; 131:861-872. (Pubitemid 350138099)
21. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 2007;318: 1917-1920.
22. Park IH, Zhao R, West JA et al. Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with deined factors. Nature 2008;451:141-146.
23. Dimos JT, Rodolfa KT, Niakan KK et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells generated from patients with ALS can be differentiated into motor neurons. Science 2008;321:1218-1221.
24. Park IH, Arora N, Huo H et al. Disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell 2008;134:877-886.
25. Kim JB, Sebastiano V, Wu G et al. Oct4-induced pluripotency in adult neural stem cells. Cell 2009;136:411-419.
26. Kim JB, Greber B, Arauzo-Bravo MJ et al. Direct reprogramming of human neural stem cells by OCT4. Nature 2009;461:649-643.
27. Zhou Q, Brown J, Kanarek A et al. In vivo reprogramming of adult pancreatic exocrine cells to beta-cells. Nature 2008;455:627-632.
28. Vierbuchen T, Ostermeier A, Pang ZP et al. Direct conversion of ibroblasts to functional neurons by deined factors. Nature 2010;463: 1035-1041.
29. Quinn J, Kunath T, Rossant J. Mouse trophoblast stem cells. Methods Mol Med 2006;121:125-148.
30. Brambrink T, Foreman R, Welstead GG et al. Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008;2:151-159. (Pubitemid 351168714)
31. Stadtfeld M, Maherali N, Breault DT et al. Deining molecular cornerstones during ibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell 2008;2:230-240.
32. Nakagawa M, Koyanagi M, Tanabe K et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human ibroblasts. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:101-106.
33. Jiang J, Chan YS, Loh YH et al. A core Klf circuitry regulates self-renewal of embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 2008;10:353-360. (Pubitemid 351331023)
34. Oda M, Tanaka S, Yamazaki Y et al. Establishment of trophoblast stem cell lines from somatic cell nuclear-transferred embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:16293-16297.
35. Feng B, Jiang J, Kraus P et al. Reprogramming of fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells with orphan nuclear receptor Esrrb. Nat Cell Biol 2009;11:197-203.
36. Ng RK, Dean W, Dawson C et al. Epigenetic restriction of embryonic cell lineage fate by methylation of Elf5. Nat Cell Biol 2008;10: 1280-1290.
37. Marahrens Y, Panning B, Dausman J et al. Xist-deficient mice are defective in dosage compensation but not spermatogenesis. Genes Dev 1997;11:156-166. (Pubitemid 27081893)
38. Plath K, Fang J, Mlynarczyk-Evans SK et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in X inactivation. Science 2003;300:131-135. (Pubitemid 36423045)
39. Rastan S, Robertson EJ. X-chromosome deletions in embryo-derived (EK) cell lines associated with lack of X-chromosome inactivation. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1985;90:379-388. (Pubitemid 16149379)
40. Penny GD, Kay GF, Sheardown SA et al. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 1996;379:131-137. (Pubitemid 26020194)
41. Rugg-Gunn PJ, Cox BJ, Ralston A et al. Distinct histone modiications in stem cell lines and tissue lineages from the early mouse embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:10783-10790.
42. Navarro P, Chambers I, Karwacki-Neisius V et al. Molecular coupling of Xist regulation and pluripotency. Science 2008;321:1693-1695.
43. Donohoe ME, Silva SS, Pinter SF et al. The pluripotency factor Oct4 interacts with Ctcf and also controls X-chromosome pairing and counting. Nature 2009;460:128-132.
44. Mak W, Baxter J, Silva J et al. Mitotically stable association of polycomb group proteins eed and enx1 with the inactive x chromosome in trophoblast stem cells. Curr Biol 2002;12:1016-1020. (Pubitemid 34703333)
45. Stadtfeld M, Apostolou E, Akutsu H et al. Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2010;465:175-181.
46. Pick M, Stelzer Y, Bar-Nur O et al. Clone- and gene-speciic aberrations of parental imprinting in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 2009;27:2686-2690.
47. Liu L, Luo GZ, Yang W et al. Activation of the imprinted Dlk1-Dio3 region correlates with pluripotency levels of mouse stem cells. J Biol Chem 2010;285:19483-19490.
48. Hochedlinger K, Jaenisch R. Nuclear reprogramming and pluripotency. Nature 2006;441:1061-1067. (Pubitemid 43990717)
49. Jaenisch R, Young R. Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell 2008;132:567-582. (Pubitemid 351253686)