The costs and benefits of calculation and moral rules

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 187-202

  Bennis, Will M ^a   Medin, Douglas L ^a   Bartels, Daniel M ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost benefit analysis; Decision making processes; Domain specificity; Moral rules; Moral values

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955372683     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691610362354     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2007). Decisions by rules: The case of unwillingness to pay for beneficial delays. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 142-152.
2. Aquino, K., & Reed, A.I. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423-1440.
3. Aronson, E. (1992). The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 303-311.
4. Atran, S.,Medin, D.L., & Ross, N.O. (2005). The cultural mind: Environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. Psychological Review, 112, 744-776.
5. Axelrod, R.M. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
6. Axelrod, R.M., & Hamilton, W.D. (1981). Evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390-1396.
7. Baron, J. (1996). Do no harm. In D.M. Messick & A.E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics (pp. 197-213). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8. Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
9. Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1-16.
10. Bartels, D.M. (2008). Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition, 108, 381-417.
11. Bartels, D.M., & Medin, D.L. (2007). Are morally motivated decision makers insensitive to the consequences of their choices? Psychological Science, 18, 24-28.
12. Basso, K.H. (1996). Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
13. Bazerman, M.H., & Moore, D. (2009). Judgment in managerial decision making (7th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Beach, L.R., & Mitchell, T. (1987). Image theory: Principles, goals, and plans in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 66, 201-220.
15. Bednar, J., & Page, S.E. (2007). Can game(s) theory explain culture? The emergence of cultural behavior within multiple games. Rationality and Society, 19, 65-97.
16. Bell, D.E., Raiffa, H., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1988). Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R.S. (2006). Advice taking and decisionmaking: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 127-151.
18. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P.J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P.J. (2001). Norms and bounded rationality. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 281-296). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P.J. (2002). Group beneficial norms can spread rapidly in a structured population. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 215, 287-296.
21. Bruner, J. (1985). Narrative and paradigmatic modes of thought. In E. Eisner (Ed.), The 84th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Part II. Learning and teaching the ways of knowing (pp. 97-115). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Connolly, T., & Reb, J. (2003). Omission bias in vaccination decisions: Where's the "omission"? Where's the "bias"? Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 91, 186-202.
23. Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgments: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17, 1082-1089.
24. Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.
25. Dawes, R.M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571-582.
26. Day, S.B., & Bartels, D.M. (2008). Representation over time: The effects of temporal distance on similarity. Cognition, 106, 1504-1513.
27. Dunwoody, P.T. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Coherence and correspondence in judgment and decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 113-115.
28. Einhorn, H.J., & Hogarth, R.M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53-88.
29. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30. Fiddick, L., Spampinato, M.V., & Grafman, J. (2005). Social contracts and precautions activate different neurological systems: An fMRI investigation of deontic reasoning. NeuroImage, 28, 778-786.
31. Fiske, A.P., & Tetlock, P.E. (1997). Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology, 18, 255-297.
32. Flood, M.M. (1958). Some experimental games. Management Science, 5, 5-26.
33. Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5-15.
34. Frank, R.H. (1988). Passions within reason. New York: Norton.
35. Frank, R.H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D.T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 159-171.
36. Frijda, N. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349-358.
37. Frisch, D., & Clemen, R.T. (1994). Beyond expected utility: Rethinking behavioral decision research. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 46-54.
38. Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Moral intuition = Fast and frugal heuristics? In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality-Intuition and diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 20-29.
40. Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107-143.
41. Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P.M., & the ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Gilbert, D.T., Pinel, E.C., Wilson, T.D., Blumberg, S.J., & Wheatley, T.P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617-638.
43. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
44. Gollwitzer, P.M., & Kirchhof, O. (1998). Willful pursuit of identity. InJ. Heckhausen & C.S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and selfregulation across the life span (pp. 389-423). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
45. Greene, J.D., Morelli, S.A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L.E., & Cohen, J.D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144-1154.
46. Greene, J.D., Nystrom, L.E., Engell, A.D., Darley, J.M., & Cohen, J.D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389-400.
47. Greene, J.D., Sommerville, R.B., Nystrom, L.E., Darley, J.M., & Cohen, J.D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108.
48. Guth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367-388.
49. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
50. Haidt, J., & Baron, J. (1996). Social roles and the moral judgment of acts and omissions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 201-218.
51. Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133, 55-66.
52. Haidt, J., Koller, S., & Dias, M. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613-628.
53. Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-52.
54. Hammerstein, P. (Ed.). (2003). Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
56. Hare, R.M. (1981). Moral thinking: Its levels, method, and point. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
57. Hastie, R., & Dawes, R.M. (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Hauser, M., Cushman, F., Young, L., & Jin, R., & Mikhail, J. (2007). A dissociation between moral judgments and justifications. Mind and Language, 22, 1-21.
59. Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F.J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred status as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165-196.
60. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E.U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15, 534-539.
61. Higgins, E.T. (1996). Ideals, oughts, and regulatory focus. In P.M. Gollwitzer & J.A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 91-114). New York: Guilford Press.
62. Hobbes, T. (2008). Leviathan. New York: Pearson Longman. (Original work published 1651)
63. Hogarth, R.M. (1981). Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 197-217.
64. Hogarth, R.M., Portell, M., & Cuxart, A. (2007). What risks do people perceive in everyday life? A perspective gained from the experience sampling method (ESM). Risk Analysis, 27, 1427-1439.
65. Hsee, C.K., & Hastie, R. (2006). Decision and experience: Why don't we choose what makes us happy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 31-37.
66. Jungermann, H. (1983). The two camps on rationality. In R.W. Scholz (Ed.), Decision making under uncertainty (pp. 63-86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
67. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, L.J., & Thaler, R.H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59, S285-S300.
68. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D.T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
69. Keeney, R.L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Cambridge University Press.
70. Klein, G.A. (1993). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In G.A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C.E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138-147). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
71. Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Larrick, R.P., Nisbett, R.E., & Morgan, J.N. (1993). Who uses the cost-benefit rules of choice? Implications for the normative status of microeconomic theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 331-347.
73. Larson, R., & Csikszentmihaly, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. In H.T. Reis (Ed.), Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction (pp. 41-56). Washington, DC: Jossey-Bass.
74. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (D. Cartwright, Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
75. Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272-292.
76. March, J.G. (1978). Bounded rationality, Ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 587-608.
77. Marglin, S.A. (2008). The dismal science: How thinking like an economist undermines community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78. Marwell, G., & Ames, R. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods, Part IV. Journal of Public Economics, 15, 295-310.
79. Medin, D.L., & Bazerman, M.H. (1999). Broadening behavioral decision research: Multiple levels of cognitive processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 533-546.
80. Medin, D.L., Schwartz, H.C., Blok, S.V., & Birnbaum, L.A. (1999). The semantic side of decision making. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 562-569.
81. Messick, D.M. (1999). Alternative logics for decision making in social settings. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39, 11-28.
82. Mikhail, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence, and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 143-152.
83. Milinski, M., Semmann, D., & Krambeck, H.J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the "tragedy of the commons." Nature, 415, 424-426.
84. Moore, A.B., Clark, B.A., & Kane, M.J. (2008). Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 19, 549-557.
85. Morewedge, C.K., Gilbert, D.T., & Wilson, T.D. (2005). The least likely of times: How remembering the past biases forecasts of the future. Psychological Science, 16, 626-630.
86. Nichols, S., & Mallon, R. (2006). Moral dilemmas and moral rules. Cognition, 100, 530-542.
87. Nowak, M.A., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393, 573-577.
88. Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review, 92, 1-22.
89. Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 137-158.
90. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (Eds.). (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
91. Ostrom, E., & Hess, C. (Eds.). (2007). Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92. Page, S.E., & Hong, L. (2004). Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 16385-16389.
93. Patt, A., & Zeckhauser, R. (2000). Action bias and environmental decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 21, 45-72.
94. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 521-533.
95. Petrinovich, L., O'Neill, P., & Jorgenson, M. (1993). An empirical study of moral intuitions: Toward an evolutionary ethics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 467-478.
96. Read, D., Loewenstein, G., & Kalyanaraman, S. (1999). Mixing virtue and vice: Combining the immediacy effect and the diversification heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 257-273.
97. Richerson, P.J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transforms human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
98. Rieskamp, J., & Otto, P.E. (2006). SSL:A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 207-236.
99. Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1992). Status-quo and omission biases. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 49-61.
100. Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1999). Protected values and omission bias. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 79, 79-94.
101. Rottenstreich, Y., & Hsee, C.K. (2001). Money, kisses, and electric shocks: An affective psychology of risk. Psychological Science, 12, 185-190.
102. Royzman, E.B., & Baron, J. (2002). The preference for indirect harm. Social Justice Research, 15, 165-184.
103. Schkade, D.A., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 9, 340-346.
104. Shah, A.K., & Oppenheimer, D.M. (2008). Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 207-222.
105. Shweder, R.A., Much, N.C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the "big three" explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119-172). New York: Routledge.
106. Shweder, R.A., & Sullivan, M.A. (1990). The semiotic subject of cultural psychology. In L.A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 399-416). New York: Guilford Press.
107. Simon, H.A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.
108. Simon, H.A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138.
109. Simon, H.A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley.
110. Simon, H.A. (1991). Models of my life. New York: Basic Books.
111. Skitka, L.J. (2003). Of different minds: An accessible identity approach to why and how people think about justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 286-297.
112. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E.,&MacGregor, D.G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich,D.Griffin,&D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397-420). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
113. Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D.G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311-322.
114. Spranca, M.,Minsk, E., & Baron, J. (1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 76-105.
115. Sunstein, C.R. (2005). Moral heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 531-573.
116. Taleb, N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House.
117. Tanner, C.,& Medin, D.L. (2004).Protected values:Noomission bias and no framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 185-191.
118. Tenbrunsel, A.E., & Messick, D.M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 684-707.
119. Tetlock, P.E. (2002). Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychological Review, 109, 451-471.
120. Tetlock, P.E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 320-324.
121. Tetlock, P.E., Kristel, O.V., Elson, S.B., Green, M.C., & Lerner, J.S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853-870.
122. Thomson, J.J. (1985). The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395-1415.
123. Thorngate, W. (1980). Efficient decision heuristics. Behavioral Science, 25, 219-225.
124. Trivers, R.L. (1971). Evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.
125. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.
126. Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281-299.
127. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
128. Waldmann, M.R., & Dieterich, J.H. (2007). Throwing a bomb on a person versus throwing a person on a bomb: Intervention myopia in moral intuitions. Psychological Science, 18, 247-253.
129. Weber, E.U. (1998, November). From Shakespeare to Spielberg: Predicting modes of decision making. Presidential address presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Judgment and Decision Making, Dallas, TX.
130. Weber, E.U., Ames, D., & Blais, A.-R. (2005). "How do I choose thee? Let me count the ways": A textual analysis of similarities and differences in modes of decision making in China and the United States. Management and Organization Review, 1, 87-118.
131. Wilson, T.D., & Gilbert, D.T. (2003). Affective forecasting. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 346-412). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
132. Wilson, T.D., & LaFleur, S.J. (1995). Knowing what you'll do: Effects of analyzing reasons on self-prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 21-35.
133. Wilson, T.D., & Schooler, J.W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preference and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.