The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism

Journal of Public Economics

Volumn 95, Issue 7-8, 2011, Pages 513-520

  Andreoni, James ^a,b   Rao, Justin M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Altruism; Communication; Empathy; Inequality

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955074358     PISSN: 00472727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Akhtar N., Carpenter M., Tomasello M. The role of discourse novelty in early word learning. Child Development 1996, 635-645.
2. Andreoni J. Philanthropy. Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism 2006, 1201-1269. Elsevier. S. Kolm, J. Ythier (Eds.).
3. Andreoni J., Bernheim B. Social image and the 50-50 norm: a theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 2009, 77(5):1607-1636.
4. Andreoni J., Miller J. Giving according to GARP: an experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica 2002, 70(2):737-753.
5. Andreoni J., Payne A. Do government grants to private charities crowd out giving or fund-raising?. The American Economic Review 2003, 93(3):792-812.
6. Ariely D., Bracha A., Meier S. Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. The American Economic Review 2009, 99(1):544-555.
7. Batson C. The Altruism Question: Toward a Social Psychological Answer 1991, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc.
8. Batson C. Addressing the altruism question experimentally. Altruism and Altruistic Love 2002, Oxford University Press. S. Post, L. Underwood, J. Schloss, W. Hurlbut (Eds.).
9. Batson C., Dyck J., Brandt J., Batson J., Powell A., McMaster M., Griffitt C. Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 55(1):52.
10. Battigalli P., Dufwenberg M. Guilt in games. The American Economic Review 2007, 97(2):170-176.
11. Bodner R., Prelec D. The diagnostic value of actions in a self-signaling model. The Psychology of Economic Decisions, vol. Rationality and Well-being 2003, vol. 1. Oxford University Press. I. Brocas, J. Carillo (Eds.).
12. Bohnet I., Frey B. The sound of silence in prisoner's dilemma and dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1999, 38(1):43-57.
13. Bohns V., Flynn F. "Why didn't you just ask?" Underestimating the discomfort of help-seeking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46(2):402-409.
14. Bolton G., Ockenfels A. ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. The American Economic Review 2000, 90(1):166-193.
15. Boyd R., Richerson P. Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology 1992, 13(3):171-195.
16. Call J., Tomasello M. A nonverbal false belief task: the performance of children and great apes. Child Development 1999, 70(2):381-395.
17. Charness G. Self-serving cheap talk: a test of Aumann's Conjecture. Games and Economic Behavior 2000, 33(2):177-194.
18. Charness G., Dufwenberg M. Promises and partnership. Econometrica 2006, 74(6):1579-1601.
19. Charness G., Rabin M. Expressed preference in experimental games. Games and Economic Behavior 2005, 53.
20. Clark H. Arenas of language use. Center for the Study of Language 1992.
21. Crawford V., Iriberri N. Level-k auctions: can a nonequilibrium model of strategic thinking explain the winner's curse and overbidding in private-value auctions?. Econometrica 2007, 75(6):1721-1770.
22. Dana J., Cain D., Dawes R. What you don't know won't hurt me: costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2006, 100(2):193-201.
23. Dana J., Weber R., Kuang J. Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory 2007, 33(1):67-80.
24. De Quervain D., Fischbacher U., Treyer V., Schellhammer M., Schnyder U., Buck A., Fehr E. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 2004, 305(5688):1254-1258.
25. De Vignemont F., Singer T. The empathic brain: how, when and why?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(10):435-441.
26. Decety J., Jackson P. A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2006, 15(2):54-58.
27. Dufwenberg M., Gneezy U. Efficiency, reciprocity, and expectations in an experimental game. Games and Economic Behavior 2000, 30:163-182.
28. Ellingsen T., Johannesson M. Promises, threats and fairness. The Economic Journal 2004, 114(495):397-420.
29. Fehr E., Fischbacher U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 2003, 425(6960):785-791.
30. Fehr E., Schmidt K. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1999, 114(3):817-868.
31. Forsythe R., Horowitz J., Savin N., Sefton M. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior 1994, 6(3):347-369.
32. Grice H. Meaning. The Philosophical Review 1957, 377-388.
33. Grossman Z. Strategic ignorance and the robustness of social preferences. UCSB Working Paper 2010.
34. Gurerk O., Irlenbusch B., Rockenbach B. The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science 2006, 312(5770):108-111.
35. Hamilton W. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1964, 7(1):1.
36. Harbaugh W., Mayr U., Burghart D. Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science 2007, 316(5831):1622.
37. Hare B., Call J., Tomasello M. Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know?. Animal Behaviour 2001, 61(1):139-152.
38. Hare T., Camerer C., Knoepfle D., O'Doherty J., Rangel A. Vale computations in ventral medial prefrontal cortex during charitable decision making incorporate input from regions involved in social cognition. The Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(2):583-590.
39. Hoffman E., McCabe K., Smith V.L. Social distance and other regarding behavior in dictator games. The American Economic Review 1996, 86(3):653-660.
40. Landry C., Lange A., List J., Price M., Rupp N. Toward an understanding of the economics of charity: evidence from a field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2006, 121(2):747-782.
41. Masclet D., Noussair C., Tucker S., Villeval M. Monetary and nonmonetary punishment in the voluntary contributions mechanism. The American Economic Review 2003, 93(1):366-380.
42. Mohlin E., Johannesson M. Communication: content or relationship?. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2008, 65(3-4):409-419.
43. Moll J., Krueger F., Zahn R., Pardini M., de Oliveira-Souza R., Grafman J. Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006, 103(42):15623.
44. Nowak M., Sigmund K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 2005, 437:1291.
45. Preston S., de Waal F. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2002, 25(1).
46. Rankin F. Requests and social distance in dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2006, 60(1):27-36.
47. Roth A. Bargaining Experiments. Handbook of Experimental Economics 1995, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. J.H. Kagel, A. Roth (Eds.).
48. Schelling T. The life you save may be your own. Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis 1968, 127-162.
49. Small D., Loewenstein G. Helping a victim or helping the victim: altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2003, 26(1):5-16.
50. Tadelis S. The power of shame and the rationality of trust. SSRN Working Paper 2008, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1006169.
51. Tangney J. Recent advances in the empirical study of shame and guilt. The American Behavioral Scientist 1995, 38(8):1132.
52. Tomasello M. Origins of Human Communication 2008, The MIT Press.
53. Tricomi E., Rangel A., Camerer C., O'Doherty J. Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences. Nature 2010, 463(7284):1089-1091.
54. Trivers R. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology 1971, 46(1):35.
55. Xiao E., Houser D. Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005, 102(20):7398-7401.
56. Xiao E., Houser D. Avoiding the sharp tongue: anticipated written messages promote fair economic exchange. Journal of Economic Psychology 2009, 30(3):393-404.