Interpersonal variation in understanding robots as social actors

HRI 2011 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 53-60

  Fischer, Kerstin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Computers as Social Actors paradigm; Linguistic variation; Mindless transfer; Verbal human robot interaction

Indexed keywords

HUMAN INTERACTIONS; MINDLESS TRANSFER; ROBOT INTERACTIONS; SOCIAL ACTORS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; VERBAL HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LINGUISTICS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 79953157658     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1957656.1957672     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Amalberti, R., Carbonell, N. & Falzon, P. 1993. User Representations of Computer Systems in Human-Computer Speech Interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38, 547-566.
2. Andonova, E. 2006. On Changing Mental Models of a Wheelchair Robot. Proceedings of the Workshop on 'How People Talk to Computers, Robots, and Other Artificial Communication Partners', Hansewissenschaftskolleg, Delmenhorst, April 21-23, 2006, pp. 131-139.
3. Branigan, H.R, Pickering, M., Pearson, J. & McLean, L.F. 2010. Linguistic alignment between people and computers. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2355-2368.
4. Clark, H.H. 1999. How Do Real People Communicate with Virtual Partners? Proceedings ofAAAI-99 Fall Symposium, Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems, November 5-7th, 1999, North Falmouth, MA.
5. Fischer, K. 2006. What Computer Talk is and Isn 't: Human-Computer Conversation asIntercultural Communication. AQ, Saarbrücken.
6. Fischer. K., Foth, K., Rohlfing, K. & Wrede, B. to appear. Mindful Tutors: Linguistic Choice and Action Demonstration in Speech to Infants and a Simulated Robot. Interaction Studies.
7. Fogg, B.J. & Nass, C. 1997. Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies 46, 5: 551-561. (Pubitemid 127402944)
8. Foth, K., Menzel, W. & Schröder, I. 2000. A Transformation-based Parsing Technique with Anytime Properties. 4th Int. Workshop on Parsing Technologies, IWPT2000, pp. 89-100.
9. Fraser, N. and Gilbert, G.N. 1991. Simulating Speech Systems. Computer Speech and Language 5: 81-99.
10. Fussell, S. R., Kiesler, S., Setlock, L. D. & Yew, V. 2008. How people anthropomorphize robots. Proceedings of HumanRobot Interaction 2008 (pp. 145-152). NY: ACM Press.
11. Johnson, D., Gardner, J. & Wiles, J. 2004. Experience as a moderator of the media equation: the impact of flattery and praise. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 3: 237-258.
12. Johnstone, A., Berry, U., Nguyen, T. and Asper, A. 1994. There was a Long Pause: Influencing Turn-Taking Behaviour in Human-Human and Human-Computer Spoken Dialogues. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 41: 383-411.
13. Ju, W. and Leifer, L. 2008. The Design of Implicit Interactions: Making Interactive Systems Less Obnoxious. Design Issues 24, 3: 72-84.
14. Ju, W., Takayama, L. 2008. Approachability: How People Interpret Automatic Door Movement as Gesture. In Proceedings of Design & Emotion 2008.
15. Kanda, T., Miyashita, T., Osada, T., Haikawa, Y. & H. Ishiguro 2008. Analysis of Humanoid Appearances in HumanRobot Interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 24, 3: 725-735.
16. Lankenau, A. and Roefer, Thomas 2001. A Safe and Versatile Mobility Assistant. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 7: 29-37.
17. Lee, Eun-Ju 2008. Flattery May Get Computers Somewhere, Sometimes: The Moderating Role of Output Modality, Computer Gender, and User Gender. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66: 789-800.
18. Lee, Kwan Min & Nass, C. 2003. Designing Social Presence of Social Actors in Human Computer Interaction. CHI 2003, April 5-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 5, 1: 289-296.
19. Nass, C. 2004. Etiquette Equality: Exhibitions and Expectations of Computer Politeness. Communications of the ACM 47, 4: 35-37.
20. Nass, C, Brave, S. 2005. Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Nass, C. & Moon, Y. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56, 1, 81-103. (Pubitemid 30442265)
22. Okita, S.Y, Bailenson, J.& Schwartz, D. L. 2008. Mere belief in social action improves complex learning. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences Volume 2, Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 132-139.
23. Paepke, S. & Takayama, L. 2010. Judging a Bot By Its Cover: An Experiment on Expectation Setting for Personal Robots. Proceedings of Human Robot Interaction (HRI), Osaka, Japan.
24. Pearson, J., Hu, J., Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M.J. & Nass, C. 2006. Adaptive language behavior in HCI: How expectations and beliefs about a system affect users' word choice. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montréal, April 2006, pp. 1177-1180.
25. Pickering, M. & Garrod, S. 2004. Towards a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 169-225.
26. Pratt, J. A., Häuser, K., Ugray, Z., Patterson, O. 2007. Looking at human-computer interface design: Effects of ethnicity in computer agents. Interacting with Computers 19, 4: 512-523. (Pubitemid 47002269)
27. Reeves, B., Nass, C. 1996. The Media Equation. How people treat computers, televisions, and new media like real people and places. CSLI, Stanford & Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
28. Shechtman, N., Horowitz, L.M. 2003. Media Inequality in Conversation: How People Behave Differently When Interacting with Computers and People. CHI 2003, April 5-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, pp. 281-288.
29. Smith, S.W., Scholnick, N., Crutcher, A. & Simeone, M. 1991. Foreigner Talk Revisited: Limits on Accomodation to Nonfluent Speakers. In: Blommaert, J. & Verschueren, J. (eds.), The Pragmatics of International and Intercultural Communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
30. Takayama, L. 2009. Making Sense of Agentic Objects and Teleoperation: In-the-moment and Reflective Perspectives. Late Breaking Results of Human Robot Interaction (HRI), San Diego, CA, pp.239-240.
31. Turkle, S. 2006. A Nascent Robotics Culture: New Complicities for Companionship. AAAI Technical Report Series, July 2006.
32. Zoltan-Ford, E. 1991. How to Get People to Say and Type what Computers Can Understand. International Journal of 'ManMachine Studies 34: 527-647.
33. Zuengler, J. 1991. Accomodation in Native-Nonnative Interactions: Going beyond the "What" to the "Why" in SecondLanguage Research. In: Giles, H., Coupland, J. & Coupland, N. (eds.), Contexts of Accomodation. Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.