Targeted metabolic reconstruction: A novel approach for the characterization of plant-pathogen interactions

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 151-162

  Pinzón, Andrés ^a,b   Rodriguez R, Luis M ^a,c   González, Andrés ^a   Bernal, Adriana ^a   Restrepo, Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^c LAMFU   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Metabolic reconstruction; Plant pathogen interactions; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; GENOME; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PARASITOLOGY; PATHOGENICITY; PHYTOPHTHORA INFESTANS; PLANT DISEASE; POTATO;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENOME; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; PHYTOPHTHORA INFESTANS; PLANT DISEASES; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

PHYTOPHTHORA INFESTANS; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 79953132532     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbq009     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Giersch C. Mathematical modelling of metabolism. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2000;3:249-53.
2. Morgan JA, Rhodes D. Mathematical modeling of plant metabolic pathways. Metab Eng 2002;4:80-9.
3. Poolman MG, Assmus HE, Fell DA. Applications of metabolic modelling to plant metabolism. J Exp Bot 2004;55:1177-86.
4. Rios-Estepa R, Lange BM. Experimental and mathematical approaches to modeling plant metabolic networks. Phytochemistry 2007;68:2351-74.
5. Jones JD, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature 2006;444:323-9.
6. Mackey D, McFall AJ. MAMPs and MIMPs: proposed classifications for inducers of innate immunity. Mol Microbiol 2006;61:1365-71.
7. Gómez-Gómez L, Boller T. Flagellin perception: a paradigm for innate immunity. Trends Plant Sci 2002;7:251-6.
8. Kunze G, Zipfel C, Robatzek S, et al. The N terminus of bacterial elongation factor Tu elicits innate immunity in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell 2004;16:3496-507.
9. Zeidler D, Zähringer U, Gerber I, et al. Innate immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana: lipopolysaccharides activate nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and induce defense genes. ProcNatlAcad Sci USA 2004;101:15811-6.
10. Gómez-Gómez L, Boller T. FLS2: an LRR receptor-like kinase involved in the perception of the bacterial elicitor flagellin in Arabidopsis. Molecular Cell 2000;5:1003-11.
11. Gimenez-Ibanez S, Ntoukakis V, Rathjen JP. The LysM receptor kinase CERK1 mediates bacterial perception in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav 2009;4:539-41.
12. Zipfel C, Kunze G, Chinchilla D, et al. Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell 2006;125:749-60.
13. Ingle RA, Carstens M, Denby KJ. PAMP recognition and the plant-pathogen arms race. BioEssays: news and reviews in molecular. cellular and developmental biology 2006;28:880-9.
14. Grant SR, Fisher EJ, Chang JH, et al. Subterfuge and manipulation: type III effector proteins of phytopathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 2006;60:425-49.
15. Mudgett MB. New insights to the function of phytopathogenic bacterial type III effectors in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2005;56:509-31.
16. Nomura K, Melotto M, He S. Suppression of host defense in compatible plant-Pseudomonas syringae interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2005;8:361-8.
17. Caplan J, Padmanabhan M, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Plant NBLRR immune receptors: from recognition to transcriptional reprogramming. Cell Host Microbe 2008;3:126-35.
18. Greenberg JT, Yao N. The role and regulation of programmed cell death in plant-pathogen interactions. Cell Microbiol 2004;6:201-11.
19. Buell CR, Joardar V, Lindeberg M, et al. The complete genome sequence of the Arabidopsis and tomato pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:10181-6.
20. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000;408:796-815.
21. Holt BF, Mackey D, Dangl JL. Recognition of pathogens by plants. Curr Biol CB 2000;10:R5-R7.
22. Felix G, Duran JD, Volko S, et al. Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin. Plant J 1999;18:265-76.
23. Gómez-Gómez L, Felix G, Boller T. A single locus determines sensitivity to bacterial flagellin in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 1999;18:277-84.
24. Asai T, Tena G, Plotnikova J, et al. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 2002;415:977-83.
25. Axtell MJ, Staskawicz BJ. Initiation of RPS2-specified disease resistance in Arabidopsis is coupled to the AvrRpt2-directed elimination of RIN4. Cell 2003;112:369-77.
26. Kunkel BN, Bent AF, Dahlbeck D, et al. RPS2, an Arabidopsis disease resistance locus specifying recognition of Pseudomonas syringae strains expressing the avirulence gene avrRpt2. Plant Cell 1993;5:865-75.
27. Mackey D, Belkhadir Y, Alonso JM, et al. Arabidopsis RIN4 is a target of the type III virulence effector AvrRpt2 and modulates RPS2-mediated resistance. Cell 2003;112:379-89.
28. Grant MR, Godiard L, Straube E, et al. Structure of the Arabidopsis RPM1 gene enabling dual specificity disease resistance. Science (NewYork) 1995;269:843-6.
29. Tornero P, Chao RA, Luthin WN, et al. Large-scale structure-function analysis of the Arabidopsis RPM1 disease resistance protein. Plant Cell 2002;14:435-50.
30. Gassmann W, Hinsch ME, Staskawicz BJ. The Arabidopsis RPS4 bacterial-resistance gene is a member of the TIRNBS-LRR family of disease-resistance genes. Plant J 1999;20:265-77.
31. Belkhadir Y, Subramaniam R, Dangl JL. Plant disease resistance protein signaling: NBS-LRR proteins and their partners. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2004;7:391-9.
32. Ryan CA, Huffaker A, Yamaguchi Y. New insights into innate immunity in Arabidopsis. Cellular Microbiol 2007;9:1902-8.
33. Innes RW. Genetic dissection of R gene signal transduction pathways. Curr Opin Plant Biol 1998;1:299-304.
34. Koch E, Slusarenko A. Arabidopsis is susceptible to infection by a downy mildew fungus. Plant Cell 1990;2:437-45.
35. Van Damme M, Andel A, Huibers RP, et al. Identification of Arabidopsis loci required for susceptibility to the downy mildew pathogen Hyaloperonospora parasitica. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2005;18:583-92.
36. Slusarenko AJ, Schlaich NL. Downy mildew of Arabidopsis thaliana caused by Hyaloperonospora parasitica (formerly Peronospora parasitica). Mol Plant Pathol 2003;4:159-70.
37. Rentel MC, Leonelli L, Dahlbeck D, et al. Recognition of the Hyaloperonospora parasitica effector ATR13 triggers resistance against oomycete, bacterial, and viral pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:1091-6.
38. Tian ZD, Liu J, Wang BL, et al. Screening and expression analysis of Phytophthora infestans induced genes in potato leaves with horizontal resistance. Plant Cell Rep 2006;25:1094-103.
39. Restrepo S, Myers KL, del Pozo O, et al. Gene profiling of a compatible interaction between Phytophthora infestans and Solanum tuberosum suggests a role for carbonic anhydrase. Mol Plant Microbe Interact: MPMI 2005;18:913-22.
40. Haas BJ, Kamoun S, Zody MC, etal. Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Nature 2009;461:393-8.
41. Tyler BM, Tripathy S, Zhang X, et al. Phytophthora genome sequences uncover evolutionary origins and mechanisms of pathogenesis. Science (NewYork) 2006;313:1261-6.
42. Huitema E, Bos JI, Tian M, et al. Linking sequence to phenotype in Phytophthora-plant interactions. Trends Microbiol 2004;12:193-200.
43. Ebbole DJ. Magnaporthe as a model for understanding hostpathogen interactions. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2007;45:437-56.
44. Wilson RA, Talbot NJ. Under pressure: investigating the biology of plant infection by Magnaporthe oryzae. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009;7:185-95.
45. Caracuel-Rios Z, Talbot NJ. Cellular differentiation and host invasion by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007;10:339-45.
46. Bryan GT, Wu KS, Farrall L, et al. A single amino acid difference distinguishes resistant and susceptible alleles of the rice blast resistance gene Pi-ta. Plant Cell 2000;12:2033-46.
47. Orbach MJ, Farrall L, Sweigard JA, et al. A telomeric avirulence gene determines efficacy for the rice blast resistance gene Pi-ta. Plant Cell 2000;12:2019-32.
48. Yoshida K, Saitoh H, Fujisawa S, et al. Association genetics reveals three novel avirulence genes from the rice blast fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Cell 2009;21:1573-91.
49. Skamnioti P, Gurr SJ. Against the grain: safeguarding rice from rice blast disease. Trends Biotechnol 2009;27:141-50.
50. Wise RP, Moscou MJ, Bogdanove AJ, et al. Transcript profiling in host-pathogen interactions. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2007;45:329-69.
51. Rowland O, Jones JD. Unraveling regulatory networks in plant defense using microarrays. Genome Biol 2001;2:REVIEWS1001.
52. Schenk PM, Kazan K, Wilson I, et al. Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:11655-60.
53. de Torres-Zabala M, Truman W, Bennett MH, et al. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato hijacks the Arabidopsis abscisic acid signalling pathway to cause disease. EMBOJ 2007;26:1434-43.
54. Truman W, de Zabala MT, Grant M. Type III effectors orchestrate a complex interplay between transcriptional networks to modify basal defence responses during pathogenesis and resistance. PlantJ 2006;46:14-33.
55. Hauck P, Thilmony R, He SY. A Pseudomonas syringae type III effector suppresses cell wall-based extracellular defense in susceptible Arabidopsis plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:8577-82.
56. Petersen M, Brodersen P, Naested H, et al. Arabidopsis map kinase 4 negatively regulates systemic acquired resistance. Cell 2000;103:1111-20.
57. Zhang Z, Li Q, Li Z, etal. Dual regulation role of GH3.5 in salicylic acid and auxin signaling during Arabidopsis-Pseudomonas syringae interaction. Plant Physiol 2007;145:450-64.
58. Eulgem T, Weigman VJ, Chang H, et al. Gene expression signatures from three genetically separable resistance gene signaling pathways for downy mildew resistance. Plant Physiol 2004;135:1129-44.
59. Tsuda K, Sato M, Glazebrook J, et al. Interplay between MAMP-triggered and SA-mediated defense responses. Plant J 2008;53:763-75.
60. Glazebrook J, Chen W, Estes B, et al. Topology of the network integrating salicylate and jasmonate signal transduction derived from global expression phenotyping. Plant J 2003;34:217-28.
61. Chen H, Xue L, Chintamanani S, et al. ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3 and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE1 Repress SALICYLIC ACID INDUCTION DEFICIENT2 Expression to Negatively Regulate Plant Innate Immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009;21:2527-40.
62. Murray SL, Ingle RA, Petersen LN, et al. Basal resistance against Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis involves WRKY53 and a protein with homology to a nematode resistance protein. Mol Plant Microbe Interact: MPMI 2007;20:1431-8.
63. Matsumura H, Reich S, Ito A, et al. Gene expression analysis of plant host-pathogen interactions by SuperSAGE. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:15718-23.
64. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10:57-63.
65. Jones AM, Thomas V, Truman B, et al. Specific changes in the Arabidopsis proteome in response to bacterial challenge: differentiating basal and R-gene mediated resistance. Phytochemistry 2004;65:1805-16.
66. Jones AM, Bennett MH, Mansfield JW, et al. Analysis of the defence phosphoproteome of Arabidopsis thaliana using differential mass tagging. Proteomics 2006;6:4155-65.
67. Nomura K, Debroy S, Lee YH, et al. A bacterial virulence protein suppresses host innate immunity to cause plant disease. Science (NewYork) 2006;313:220-3.
68. Mackey D, Holt BF, Wiig A, et al. RIN4 interacts with Pseudomonas syringae type III effector molecules and is required for RPM1-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis. Cell 2002;108:743-54.
69. Jia Y, McAdams SA, Bryan GT, et al. Direct interaction of resistance gene and avirulence gene products confers rice blast resistance. EMBOJ 2000;19:4004-14.
70. Feys BJ, Moisan LJ, Newman MA, et al. Direct interaction between the Arabidopsis disease resistance signaling proteins, EDS1 and PAD4. EMBOJ 2001;20:5400-11.
71. Takahashi A, Casais C, Ichimura K, et al. HSP90 interacts with RAR1 and SGT1 and is essential for RPS2-mediated disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:11777-82.
72. Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science (New York) 2003;301:653-57.
73. Nasir KH, Takahashi Y, Ito A, et al. High-throughput in planta expression screening identifies a class II ethyleneresponsive element binding factor-like protein that regulates plant cell death and non-host resistance. Plant J 2005;43:491-505.
74. Glazebrook J. Genes controlling expression of defense responses in Arabidopsis-2001 status. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2001;4:301-8.
75. Vleeshouwers VG, Rietman H, Krenek P, et al. Effector genomics accelerates discovery and functional profiling of potato disease resistance and Phytophthora infestans avirulence genes. PLoS One 2008;3:e2875.
76. Oh S, Young C, Lee M, et al. In Planta Expression Screens of Phytophthora infestans RXLR effectors reveal diverse phenotypes, including activation of the Solanum bulbocastanum disease resistance protein Rpi-blb2. Plant Cell 2009; Epub 2009 Sep 30.
77. He F, Zhang Y, Chen H, et al. The prediction of protein-protein interaction networks in rice blast fungus. BMC Genomics 2008;9:519.
78. Parker D, Beckmann M, Zubair H, et al. Metabolomic analysis reveals a common pattern of metabolic re-programming during invasion of three host plant species by Magnaporthe grisea. PlantJ 2009;59:723-37.
79. Edwards JS, Covert M, Palsson B. Metabolic modelling of microbes: the flux-balance approach. Environ Microbiol 2002;4:133-40.
80. Boyer F, Viari A. Ab initio reconstruction of metabolic pathways. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2003;19(Suppl 2): ii26-34.
81. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, et al. From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D354-7.
82. Green ML, Karp PD. Genome annotation errors in pathway databases due to semantic ambiguity in partial EC numbers. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:4035-9.
83. Durot M, Le Fèvre F, de Berardinis V, et al. Iterative reconstruction of a global metabolic model of Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1 using high-throughput growth phenotype and gene essentiality data. BMC Syst Biol 2008;2:85.
84. González Barrios AF, Mejía Méndez JD, Racines Pérez F, et al. Genome scale modeling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a microbial air-cathode single chamber fuel cell. AIChE National Meeting, Nashville, Tennessee, 2009. http://aiche.confex.com/aiche/2009/webprogram/Paper166485.html.
85. Burgard AP, Pharkya P, Maranas CD. Optknock: a bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003;84:647-57.
86. Abuoun M, Suthers PF, Jones GI, et al. Genome scale reconstruction of a Salmonella metabolic model: comparison of similarity and differences with a commensal Escherichia coli strain. J Biol Chem 2009; Epub 2009 Aug 18.
87. Zhang Y, Thiele I, Weekes D, et al. Three-dimensional structural view of the central metabolic network of Thermotoga maritima. Science (NewYork) 2009;325:1544-9.
88. Grafahrend-Belau E, Schreiber F, Koschützki D, et al. Flux balance analysis of barley seeds: a computational approach to study systemic properties of central metabolism. Plant Physiol 2009;149:585-98.
89. Resendis-Antonio O, Reed JL, Encarnación S, et al. Metabolic reconstruction and modeling of nitrogen fixation in Rhizobium etli. PLoS Comput Biol 2007;3:1887-95.
90. Edwards JS, Palsson BO. Systems properties of the Haemophilus influenzae Rd metabolic genotype. J Biol Chem 1999;274:17410-6.
91. Oberhardt MA, Palsson BØ, Papin JA. Applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions. Mol Sys Biol 2009;5:320.
92. Durot M, Bourguignon P, Schachter V. Genome-scale models of bacterial metabolism: reconstruction and applications. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2009;33:164-90.
93. Carrera J, Rodrigo G, Jaramillo A. Towards the automated engineering of a synthetic genome. Mol Biosyst 2009;5:733-43.
94. Oberhardt MA, Puchałka J, Fryer KE, et al. Genomescale metabolic network analysis of the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Bacteriol 2008;190:2790-803.
95. Gianchandani E, Chavali A, Papin JA. The application of flux balance analysis in systems biology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Sys Biol and Med 2009. http://wires.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WiresArticle/wisId-WSBM60.html.
96. Kauffman KJ, Prakash P, Edwards JS, et al. Advances in flux balance analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2003;14:491-6.
97. Radrich K, Tsuruoka Y, Dobson P, et al. Reconstruction of an in silico metabolic model of Arabidopsis thaliana through database integration. Nature Precedings 2009; Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10101/npre.2009.3309.1.
98. Edwards JS, Palsson BO. The Escherichia coli MG1655 in silico metabolic genotype: its definition, characteristics, and capabilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:5528-33.
99. Castelfranco PA, Beale SI. Chlorophyll biosynthesis: recent advances and areas of current interest. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 1983;34:241-76.