PAMP recognition and the plant-pathogen arms race

BioEssays

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 880-889

  Ingle, Robert A ^a   Carstens, Maryke ^a   Denby, Katherine J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

BACTERIUM DETECTION; HOST RESISTANCE; INNATE IMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT DISEASE CONTROL; PLANT PATHOGEN INTERACTION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

FLAGELLIN; IMMUNITY, INNATE; IMMUNITY, NATURAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT DISEASES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33748918965     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.20457     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Dangl JL, Jones JDG. 2001. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 411:826-833.
2. Nürnberger T, Lipka V. 2005. Non-host resistance in plants: new insights into an old phenomenon. Mol Plant Pathol 6:335-345.
3. Nürnberger T, Brunner F. 2002. Innate immunity in plants and animals: emerging parallels between the recognition of general elicitors and pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:318-324.
4. Jones DA, Takemoto D. 2004. Plant innate immunity - direct and indirect recognition of general and specific pathogen-associated molecules. Curr Opin Immunol 16:48-62.
5. Felix G, Boller T. 2003. Molecular Sensing of Bacteria in Plants. The highly conserved RNA-binding motif RNP-1 of bacterial cold shock proteins is recognized as an elicitor signal in tobacco. J Biol Chem 278:6201-6208.
6. Felix G, Duran JD, Volko S, Boller T. 1999. Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin. Plant J 18:265-276.
7. Kunze G, Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Niehaus K, Boller T et al. 2004. The N Terminus of Bacterial Elongation Factor Tu Elicits Innate Immunity in Arabidopsis Plants. Plant Cell 16:3496-3507.
8. Nürnberger T, Nennstiel D, Jabs T, Sacks WR, Hahlbrock K et al. 1994. High affinity binding of a fungal oligopeptide elicitor to parsley plasma membranes triggers multiple defense responses. Cell 78:449-460.
9. Ausubel FM. 2005. Are innate immune signaling pathways in plants and animals conserved? Nat Immunol 6:973-979.
10. Gómez-Gómez L, Boller T. 2002. Flagellin perception: a paradigm for innate immunity. Trends Plant Sci 7:251-256.
11. Abramovitch RB, Martin GB. 2004. Strategies used by bacterial pathogens to suppress plant defenses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:356-364.
12. Nomura K, Melotto M, He SY. 2005. Suppression of host defense in compatible plant-Pseudomonas syringae interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:361-368.
13. Parker JE. 2003. Plant recognition of microbial patterns. Trends Plant Sci 8:245-247.
14. Nürnberger T, Brunner F, Kemmerling B, Piater L. 2004. Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences. Immunol Rev 198:249-266.
15. Brunner F, Rosahl S, Lee J, Rudd J, Geiler C et al. 2002. Pep-13, a plant defense-inducing pathogen-associated pattern from Phytophthora transglutaminases. EMBO J 21:6681-6688.
16. Fellbrich G, Romanski A, Varet A, Blume B, Brunner F et al. 2002. NPP1, a Phytophthora-associated trigger of plant defense in parsley and Arabidopsis. Plant J 32:375-390.
17. Sun W, Dunning FM, Pfund C, Weingarten R, Bent AF. 2006. Within-Species Flagellin Polymorphism in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris and Its Impact on Elicitation of Arabidopsis FLAGELLIN SENSING2-Dependent Defenses. Plant Cell 18:764-779.
18. Zipfel C, Kunze G, Chinchilla D, Caniard A, Jones JDG et al. 2006. Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell 125:749-760.
19. Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Navarro L, Oakeley EJ, Jones JDG et al. 2004. Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception. Nature 428:764-767.
20. Thilmony R, Underwood W, He SY. 2006. Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana interaction with the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and the human pathogen Escherichia coli O157:H7. Plant J 46:34-53.
21. Nennstiel D, Scheel D, Nürnberger T. 1998. Characterization and partial purification of an oligopeptide elicitor receptor from parsley (Petroselinum crispum). FEBS Letters 431:405-410.
22. Bourque S, Binet M-N, Ponchet M, Pugin A, Lebrun-Garcia A. 1999. Characterization of the Cryptogein Binding Sites on Plant Plasma Membranes. J Biol Chem 274:34699-34705.
23. Fliegmann J, Mithöfer A, Wanner G, Ebel J. 2004. An ancient enzyme domain hidden in the putative β-glucan elicitor receptor of soybean may play an active part in the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns during broad host resistance. J Biol Chem 279:1132-1140.
24. Ron M, Avni A. 2004. The receptor for the fungal elicitor ethylene-inducing xylanase is a member of a resistance-like gene family in tomato. Plant Cell 16:1604-1615.
25. Gómez-Gómez L, Boller T. 2000. FLS2: an LRR receptor-like kinase involved in the perception of the bacterial elicitor flagellin in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell 5:1003-1011.
26. Chinchilla D, Bauer Z, Regenass M, Boller T, Felix G. 2006. The Arabidopsis Receptor Kinase FLS2 Binds flg22 and Determines the Specificity of Flagellin Perception. Plant Cell 18:465-476.
27. Shiu S, Bleecker A. 2001. Receptor-like kinases from Arabidopsis form a monophyletic gene family related to animal receptor kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10763-10768.
28. Underhill DM, Ozinsky A. 2002. Toll-like receptors: key mediators of microbe detection. Curr Opin Immunol 14:103-110.
29. Hayashi F, Smith K, Ozinsky A, Hawn T, Yi E et al. 2001. The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5. Nature 410:1099-1103.
30. Hemmi H, Takeuchi O, Kawai T, Kaisho T, Sato S et al. 2000. A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature 408:740-745.
31. Hoshino K, Takeuchi O, Kawai T, Sanjo H, Ogawa T et al. 1999. Cutting Edge: Toll-Like Receptor 4 (TLR4)-Deficient Mice Are Hyporesponsive to Lipopolysaccharide: Evidence for TLR4 as the Lps Gene Product. J Immunol 162:3749-3752.
32. Ozinsky A, Underhill DM, Fontenot JD, Hajjar AM, Smith KD et al. 2000. The repertoire for pattern recognition of pathogens by the innate immune system is defined by cooperation between Toll-like receptors Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13766-13771.
33. Kawasaki K, Akashi S, Shimazu R, Yoshida T, Miyake K et al. 2001. Involvement of TLR4MD-2 complex in species-specific lipopolysaccharide-mimetic signal transduction by Taxol. J Endotoxin Res 7:232-236.
34. Donnelly MA, Steiner TS 2002. Two Nonadjacent Regions in Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli Flagellin Are Required for Activation of Toll-like Receptor 5. J Biol Chem 277:40456-40461.
35. Smith K, Andersen-Nissen E, Hayashi F, Strobe K, Bergman M et al. 2003. Toll-like receptor 5 recognizes a conserved site on flagellin required for protofilament formation and bacterial motility. Nat Immunol 4:1247-1253.
36. Zipfel C, Felix G. 2005. Plants and animals: a different taste for microbes? Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:353-360.
37. Zeidler D, Zahringer U, Gerber I, Dubery I, Hartung T et al. 2004. Innate immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana: Lipopolysaccharides activate nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and induce defense genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15811-15816.
38. Mur LAJ, Santosa IE, Laarhoven LJJ, Holton NJ, Harren FJM et al. 2005. Laser photoacoustic detection allows in planta detection of nitric oxide in tobacco following challenge with avirulent and virulent Pseudomonas syringae pathovars. Plant Physiol 138:1247-1258.
39. Zeier J, Delledonne M, Mishina T, Severi E, Sonoda M et al. 2004. Genetic elucidation of nitric oxide signaling in incompatible plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Physiol 136:2875-2886.
40. Feechan A, Kwon E, Yun B-W, Wang Y, Pallas JA et al. 2005. A central role for S-nitrosothiols in plant disease resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:8054-8059.
41. Romeis T, Piedras P, Zhang S, Klessig D, Hirt H et al. 1999. Rapid Avr9- and Cf-9-dependent activation of MAP kinases in tobacco cell cultures and leaves: convergence of resistance gene, elicitor, wound, and salicylate responses. Plant Cell 11:273-287.
42. Zhang S, Klessig D. 2001. MARK cascade in plant defense signaling. Trends Plant Sci 6:520-527.
43. Menke F, van Pelt J, Pieterse C, Klessig D. 2004. Silencing of the mitogen-activated protein kinase MPK6 compromises disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16:897-907.
44. Pozo M, Van Loon L, Pieterse C. 2005. Jasmonates - signals in plant-microbe interactions. Plant Growth Regul 23:211-222.
45. Thatcher L, Anderson J, Singh K. 2005. Plant defence responses: what have we learnt from Arabidopsis? Functional Plant Biology 32:1-19.
46. Van Loon L, Geraats B, Linthorst H. 2006. Ethylene as a modulator of disease resistance in plants. Trends Plant Sci 11:183-191.
47. Mellersh DG, Heath MC. 2003. An investigation into the involvement of defense signaling pathways in components of the nonhost resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana to rust fungi also reveals a model system for studying rust fungal compatibility. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 16:398-404.
48. Zimmerli L, Stein M, Lipka V, Schulze-Lefert P, Somerville S. 2004. Host and nonhost pathogens elicit different jasmonate/ethylene responses in Arabidopsis. Plant J 40:633-646.
49. Huitema E, Vleeshouwers G, Francis D, Kamoun S. 2003. Active defence responses associated with nonhost resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana to the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Mol Plant Pathol 4:487-500.
50. Gómez-Gómez L, Felix G, Boller T. 1999. A single locus determines sensitivity to bacterial flagellin in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 18:277-284.
51. Feys B, Moisan L, Newman M, Parker J. 2001. Direct interaction between the Arabidopsis disease resistance signalling proteins, EDS1 and PAD4. EMBO J 20:5400-5411.
52. Zhou N, Tootle TL, Tsui F, Klessig DF, Glazebrook J. 1998. PAD4 functions upstream from salicylic acid to control defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10:1021-1030.
53. Yun B-W, Atkinson HA, Gaboritt C, Greenland A, Read ND et al. 2003. Loss of actin cytoskeletal function and EDS1 activity, in combination, severely compromises non-host resistance in Arabidopsis against wheat powdery mildew. Plant J 34:768-777.
54. Feys BJ, Wiermer M, Bhat RA, Moisan LJ, Medina-Escobar N et al. 2005. Arabidopsis SENESCENCE-ASSOCIATED GENE101 Stabilizes and Signals within an ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY1 Complex in Plant Innate Immunity. Plant Cell 17:2601-2613.
55. Lipka V, Dittgen J, Bednarek P, Bhat R, Wiermer M et al. 2005. Pre- and postinvasion defenses both contribute to nonhost resistance in Arabidopsis. Science 310:1180-1183.
56. Wiermer M, Feys B, Parker J. 2005. Plant immunity: the EDS1 regulatory node. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:383-389.
57. Austin M, Muskett P, Kahn K, Feys B, Jones J et al. 2002. Regulatory role of SGT1 in early R-gene-mediated plant defenses. Science 295:2077-2080.
58. Azevedo C, Sadanandom A, Kitagawa K, Freialdenhoven A, Shirasu K et al. 2002. The RAR1 interactor SGT1, an essential component of R gene-triggered disease resistance. Science 295:2073-2076.
59. Liu Y, Schiff M, Serino G, Deng X-W, Dinesh-Kumar S. 2002. Role of SCF ubiquitin-ligase and the COP9 signalosome in the N gene-mediated resistance response to tobacco mosaic virus. Plant Cell 14:1483-1496.
60. Peart J, Lu R, Sadanandom A, Malcuit I, Moffett P et al. 2002. Ubiquitin ligase-associated protein SGT1 is required for host and nonhost disease resistance in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:10865-10869.
61. Zhang Y, Li X. 2005. A putative nucleoporin 96 is required for both basal defense and constitutive resistance responses mediated by suppressor of npr1-1, constitutive 1. Plant Cell 17:1306-1316.
62. Asai T, Tena G, Plotnikova J, Willmann MR, Chiu W-L et al. 2002. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 415:977-983.
63. Gómez-Gómez L. 2004. Plant perception systems for pathogen recognition and defence. Mol Immunol 41:1055-1062.
64. Bauer Z, Gómez-Gómez L, Boller T, Felix G. 2001. Sensitivity of different ecotypes and mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana toward the bacterial elicitor flagellin correlates with the presence of receptor-binding sites. J Biol Chem 276:45669-45676.
65. Robatzek S, Chinchilla D, Boller T. 2006. Ligand-induced endocytosis of the pattern recognition receptor FLS2 in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 20:537-542.
66. Gómez-Gómez L, Bauer Z, Boller T. 2001. Both the extracellular leucine-rich repeat domain and the kinase activity of FLS2 are required for flagellin binding and signalling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13:1155-1163.
67. Lecourieux D, Lamotte O, Bourque S, Wendehenne D, Mazars C et al. 2005. Proteinaceous and oligosaccharidic elicitors induce different calcium signatures in the nucleus of tobacco cells. Cell Calcium 38:527-538.
68. Jakobek JL, Smith JA, Lindgren PB. 1993. Suppression of Bean Defense Responses by Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Cell 5:57-63.
69. Keshavarzi M, Soylu S, Brown I, Bonas U, Nicole M et al. 2004. Basal defenses induced in pepper by lipopolysaccharides are suppressed by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17:805-815.
70. Kim MG, da Cunha L, McFall AJ, Belkhadir Y, DebRoy S et al. 2005. Two Pseudomonas syringae Type III Effectors Inhibit RIN4-Regulated Basal Defense in Arabidopsis. Cell 121:749-759.
71. Hauck P, Thilmony R, He SY. 2003. A Pseudomonas syringae type III effector suppresses cell wall-based extracellular defense in susceptible Arabidopsis plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8577-8582.
72. Truman W, Torres de Zabala M, Grant M. 2006. Type III effectors orchestrate a complex interplay between transcriptional networks to modify basal defence responses during pathogenesis and resistance. Plant J 46:14-33.
73. Lu M, Tang X, Zhou J-M. 2001. Arabidopsis NHO1 Is Required for General Resistance against Pseudomonas Bacteria. Plant Cell 13:437-447.
74. Li X, Lin H, Zhang W, Zou Y, Zhang J et al. 2005. Flagellin induces innate immunity in nonhost interactions that is suppressed by Pseudomonas syringae effectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:12990-12995.
75. Van Der Biezen EA, Jones JDG. 1998. Plant disease-resistance proteins and the gene-for-gene concept. Trends Biochem Sci 23:454-456.
76. Mackey D, Holt III BF, Wiig A, Dangl JL. 2002. RIN4 Interacts with Pseudomonas syringae Type III Effector Molecules and Is Required for RPM1-Mediated Resistance in Arabidopsis. Cell 108:743-754.
77. Kim H-S, Desveaux D, Singer AU, Patel P, Sondek J et al. 2005. The Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrRpt2 cleaves its C-terminally acylated target, RIN4, from Arabidopsis membranes to block RPM1 activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:6496-6501.
78. Jamir Y, Quo M, Oh H-S, Petnicki-Ocwieja T, Chen S et al. 2004. Identification of Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors that can suppress programmed cell death in plants and yeast. Plant J 37:554-565.