A character-based approach in the Mexican cycads supports diverse multigene combinations for DNA barcoding

Cladistics

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 150-164

  Nicolalde Morejón, Fernando ^a,b   Vergara Silva, Francisco ^c   González Astorga, Jorge ^a   Stevenson, Dennis W ^d   Vovides, Andrew P ^a   Sosa, Victoria ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD VERACRUZANA   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^d NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ANALYSIS; GYMNOSPERM; IDENTIFICATION METHOD;

CERATOZAMIA; CYCADALES; CYCADOPSIDA; DIOON; ZAMIA;

EID: 79952369775     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00321.x     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Barrett, R.D.H., Hebert, P.D.N., 2005. Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Can. J. Zool. 83, 481-491.
2. Bergmann, T., Hadrys, H., Breves, G., Schierwater, B., 2009. Character-based DNA barcoding: a superior tool for species identification. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 122, 446-450.
3. Bogler, D.J., Francisco-Ortega, J., 2004. Molecular systematic studies in cycads: evidence from trnL intron and ITS2 rDNA sequences. Bot. Rev. 70, 260-273.
4. Brower, A.V.Z., 2006. Problems with DNA barcodes for species delimitation: 'ten species' of Astraptes fulgerator reassessed (Lepidopetera: Hesperiidae). Syst. Biodivers 4, 127-132.
5. Caputo, P., Cozzolino, S., De Luca, P., Moretti, A., Stevenson, D.W., 2004. Molecular phylogeny of Zamia (Zamiaceae). In: Walters, T., Osborne, R. (Eds.), Cycad Classification: Concepts and Recommendations. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp. 149-157.
6. CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 12794-12797.
7. Chase, M.W., Fay, M.F., 2009. Barcoding of plants and fungi. Science 325, 682-683.
8. Chase, M.W., Salamin, N., Wilkinson, M., Dunwell, J.M., Kesanakurth, R.P., Haidar, N., Savolainen, V., 2005. Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 360, 1889-1895.
9. Chase, M.W., Cowan, R.S., Hollingsworth, P.M., van der Berg, C., Madriñán, S., Petersen, G., Seberg, O., Jørgsensen, T., Cameron, K.M., Carine, M., Pedersen, N., Hedderson, T.A.J., Conrad, F., Salazar, G.A., Richardson, J.E., Hollingsworth, M.L., Barraclough, T.G., Kelly, L., Wilkinson, M., 2007. A proposal for a standardized protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 56, 295-299.
10. Chaw, S.M., Walters, T.W., Chang, C.C., Hu, S.H., Chen, S.H., 2005. A phylogeny of cycads (Cycadales) inferred from chloroplast matK gene, trnK intron, and nuclear rDNA ITS region. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37, 214-234.
11. Cognato, A.I., Sun, J.H., 2007. DNA based cladograms augment the discovery of a new Ips species from China (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Cladistics 23, 539-551.
12. Cowan, R.S., Chase, M.W., Kress, W.J., Savolainen, V., 2006. 300, 000 species to identity: problems, progress, and prospects in DNA barcoding of land plants. Taxon 55, 611-616.
13. DeSalle, R., 2006. Species discovery versus species identification in DNA barcoding efforts: response to Rubinoff. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1545-1547.
14. DeSalle, R., 2007. Phenetic and DNA taxonomy; a comment on Waugh. Bioessays 29, 1289-1290.
15. DeSalle, R., Egan, M.G., Siddall, M., 2005. The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 360, 1905-1916.
16. Doyle, J.J., Doyle, J.L., 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19, 11-15.
17. Ebach, M., Holdrege, C., 2005. DNA barcoding is no substitute for taxonomy. Nature 434, 697.
18. Erickson, D.L., Spouge, J., Resch, A., Weigt, L.A., Kress, W.J., 2008. DNA barcoding in land plants: developing standards to quantify and maximize success. Taxon 57, 1304-1316.
19. Fazekas, A.J., Burgess, K.S., Kesanakurti, P.R., Graham, S.W., Newmaster, S.G., Husband, B.C., Percy, D.M., Hajibabaei, M., Barrett, S.C.H., 2008. Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS ONE 3, e2802.
20. Ford, C.S., Ayres, K.L., Toomey, N., Haider, N., van Alphen Stahl, J., Kelly, L.J., Wikström, N., Hollingsworth, P.M., Duff, R.J., Hoot, S.B., Cowan, R.S., Chase, M.W., Wilkinson, M.J., 2009. Selection of candidate coding DNA barcoding regions for use on land plants. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 159, 1-11.
21. Gregory, T.R., 2005. Synergy between sequence and size in large-scale genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 699-708.
22. Hajibabaei, M., Janzen, D.H., Burns, J.M., Hallwachs, W., Hebert, P.D.N., 2006. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 968-971.
23. Hall, T.A., 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence aligment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41, 95-98.
24. Hebert, P.D.N., Gregory, T.R., 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 54, 852-859.
25. Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L., deWaard, J.R., 2003a. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 313-321.
26. Hebert, P.D.N., Ratnasingham, S., deWaard, J.R., 2003b. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270(Suppl. 1), S96-S99.
27. Hebert, P.D.N., Penton, E.H., Burns, J.M., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W., 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14812-14817.
28. Hill, K.D., Chase, M.W., Stevenson, D.W., Hills, H.G., Schutzman, B., 2003. The families and genera of cycads: a molecular phylogenetic analysis of Cycadophyta based on nuclear and plastid DNA sequences. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164, 933-948.
29. Hill, K.D., Stevenson, D.W., Osborne, R., 2007. The world list of cycads/La lista mundial de cícadas. Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 97, 454-483.
30. Janzen, D.H., 2004. Now is the time. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 359, 731-732.
31. Kelly, R.P., Sarkar, I.N., Eernisse, D.J., DeSalle, R., 2007. DNA barcoding using chitons (genus Mopalia). Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 177-183.
32. Kress, W.J., Erickson, D.L., 2007. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE 2, e508.
33. Kress, W.J., Wurdack, K.J., Zimmer, E.A., Weigt, L.A., Janzen, D.H., 2005. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 8369-8374.
34. Lahaye, R., van der Bank, M., Bogarin, D., Warner, J., Pupulin, F., Gigot, G., Maurin, O., Duthoit, S., Barraclough, T.G., Savolainen, V., 2008. DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2923-2928.
35. Little, D.P., Stevenson, D.W., 2007. A comparison of algorithms for the identification of species using DNA barcodes: examples for gymnosperms. Cladistics 23, 1-21.
36. Mathews, S., 2009. Phylogenetic relationships among seed plants: persistent questions and the limits of molecular data. Am. J. Bot. 96, 228-236.
37. Meier, R., 2008. DNA sequences in taxonomy: opportunities and challenges. In: Wheeler, Q.D. (Ed.), The New Taxonomy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 95-127.
38. Meyer, C.P., Paulay, G., 2005. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3, e422.
39. Miller, S.E., 2007. DNA barcoding and the renaissance of taxonomy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4775-4776.
40. Mortiz, C., Cicero, C., 2004. DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biology 3, e354.
41. Naro-Maciel, E., Reid, B., Fitsimmons, N.N., Lee, M., DeSalle, R., Amato, G., 2010. DNA barcodes for globally threatened marine turtles: a registry approach to documenting biodiversity. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 252-263.
42. Newmaster, S.G., Fazekas, A.J., Ragupathy, S., 2006. DNA barcoding in land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach. Can. J. Bot. 84, 335-341.
43. Nicolalde-Morejón, F., Vergara-Silva, F., González-Astorga, J., Vovides, A.P., Espinosa de los Monteros, A., 2009a. Reciprocal illumination of morphological characters upon a molecular hypothesis supports the proposal of a new species of cycad from Mexico. Syst. Biodivers. 7, 73-79.
44. Nicolalde-Morejón, F., Vovides, A.P., Stevenson, D.W., 2009b. Taxonomic revision of Zamia in Mega-Mexico. Brittonia 61, 301-335.
45. Norstog, K., Nicholls, T.J., 1997. The Biology of the Cycads. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
46. Packer, L., Gibbs, J., Sheffield, C., Hanner, R., 2009. DNA barcoding and the mediocrity of morphology. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9, 42-50.
47. Pennisi, E., 2007. Wanted: a barcode for plants. Science 318, 190-191.
48. Rach, J., DeSalle, R., Sarkar, I.N., Schierwater, B., Hadrys, H., 2008. Character-based DNA barcoding allows discrimination of genera, species and populations in Odonata. Proc. Biol. Sci. 275, 237-247.
49. Rai, H.S., O'Brien, H.E., Reeves, P.A., Olmstead, R.G., Graham, S.W., 2003. Inference of higher-order relationships in the cycads from a large chloroplast data set. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29, 350-359.
50. Ratnasingham, S., Hebert, P.D.N., 2007. BOLD: the barcode of life data system. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 355-364.
51. Rubinoff, D., 2006. DNA barcoding evolves into the familiar. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1548-1549.
52. Rubinoff, D., Cameron, S., Will, K., 2006a. Are plant DNA barcodes a search for the Holy Grail? Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 1-2.
53. Rubinoff, D., Cameron, S., Will, K., 2006b. A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for "barcoding" identification. J. Hered. 97, 581-594.
54. Sarkar, I.N., Thornton, J.W., Planet, P.J., Figurski, D.H., Schierwater, B., DeSalle, R., 2002. An automated phylogenetic key for classifying homeoboxes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24, 388-399.
55. Sarkar, I.N., Planet, P.J., DeSalle, R., 2008. CAOS software for use in character-based DNA barcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8, 1256-1259.
56. Sass, Ch., Little, D.P., Stevenson, D.W., Specht, Ch.D., 2007. DNA barcoding in the Cycadales: testing the potential of proposed barcoding markers for species Identification of cycads. PLoS ONE 11, e1154.
57. Schutzman, B., Vovides, A.P., 1998. A new Zamia (Zamiaceae-Cycadales) from Eastern Chiapas, Mexico. Novon 8, 441-446.
58. Seberg, O., Petersen, G., 2009. How many loci does it take to DNA barcode a Crocus? PLoS ONE 42, e4598.
59. Seberg, O., Humphries, J.Ch., Knapp, S., Stevenson, D.W., Petersen, G., Scharff, N., Andersen, N.M., 2003. Shortcuts in systematics? A commentary on DNA-based taxonomy Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 63-65.
60. Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Beck, J.T., Farmer, S.B., Liu, W., Miller, J., Siripun, K.C., Winder, C.T., Schilling, E.E., Small, R.L., 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am. J. Bot. 92, 142-166.
61. Smith, V.S., 2005. DNA barcoding: perspectives from a "Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy". Syst. Biol. 54, 841-844.
62. Smith, M.A., Wood, D.M., Janzen, D.L., Hallwachs, W., Hebert, P.D.N., 2007. DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4967-4972.
63. Smith, M.A., Poyarkov, N.A., Hebert, P.D.N., 2008. CO1 DNA barcoding amphibians: take the chance, meet the challenge. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8, 235-246.
64. Spooner, D.M., 2009. DNA barcoding will frecuently fail in complicated groups: an example in wild potatoes. Am. J. Bot. 96, 1177-1189.
65. Stevenson, D.W., 1990. Morphology and systematics of the Cycadales. Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 57, 8-55.
66. Stevenson, D.W., 1992. A formal classification of the extant cycads. Brittonia 44, 220-223.
67. Stoeckle, M.Y., Hebert, P.D.N., 2008. Barcode of life. Sci. Am. 299, 82-88.
68. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
69. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., Higgins, D.G., 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4876-4882.
70. Treutlein, J., Wink, M., 2002. Molecular phylogeny of cycads inferred from rbcL sequences. Naturwissenschaften 89, 221-225.
71. Vovides, A.P., González-Astorga, J., Pérez-Farrera, M.A., González, D., Bárcenas, C., Iglesias, C., 2007. The cycads of Mexico: 25years of research and conservation. Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 97, 611-641.
72. Vovides, A.P., Avendaño, S., Pérez-Farrera, M.A., González-Astorga, J., 2008a. A new species of Ceratozamia (Cycadales, Zamiaceae) from Veracruz, Mexico. Novon 18, 109-114.
73. Vovides, A.P., Pérez-Farrera, M.A., González-Astorga, J., Iglesias, C., 2008b. A new species of Ceratozamia (Zamiaceae) from Oaxaca, Mexico with comments on habitat and relationships. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 157, 169-175.
74. Ward, R.D., Zemlak, T.S., Innes, B.H., Last, P.R., Hebert, P.D.N., 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 360, 1847-1857.
75. Wheeler, Q., 2004. Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 359, 571-583.
76. Wheeler, Q., 2005. Losing the plot: DNA "barcodes" and taxonomy. Cladistics 21, 405-407.
77. Wiemers, M., Fiedler, K., 2007. Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? - a case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Front. Zool. 4, e8.
78. Will, K.W., Rubinoff, D., 2004. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics 20, 47-55.
79. Will, K.W., Mishler, B.D., Wheeler, Q.D., 2005. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 54, 844-851.
80. Zgurski, J.M., Rai, H.S., Fai, Q.M., Bogler, D.J., Francisco-Ortega, J., Graham, S.W., 2008. How well do we understand the overall backbone of cycad phylogeny? New insights from a large, multigene plastid data set. Mol. Phylogent. Evol. 47, 1232-1237.