Dna barcoding will frequently fail in complicated groups: An example in wild potatoes

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1177-1189

  Spooner, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA barcoding; ITS; MatK; Molecular phylogeny; Potato; Solanum sect. Petota; TrnH psbA intergenic spacer

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKER; DNA; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; POTATO; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; TAXONOMY;

SOLANUM; SOLANUM JAMESII; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 67650114617     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0800246     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. A DAMS, K. L., AND J. D. PALMER. 2003. Evolution of mitochondrial gene content: Gene loss and transfer to the nucleus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 380-395.
2. ÁLVAREZ, A. E., AND J. F. WENDEL. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 417-434.
3. ALVAREZ , N. M. B. , I. E. PERALTA A S ALAS AND D. M. SPOONER. 2008. A morphological study of species boundaries of the wild potato Solanum brevicaule complex: Replicated fi eld trials in Peru. Plant Systematics and Evolution 274: 37-45.
4. AMES, M., A. SALAS, AND D. M. SPOONER. 2008. A morphometric study of species boundaries of the wild potato Solanum series Piurana (Solanaceae) and putatively related species from seven other series in Solanum sect. Petota. Systematic Botany 33: 566-578.
5. AMES, M., AND D. M. SPOONER. 2008. DNA from herbarium specimens settles a controversy about origins of the European potato. American Journal of Botany 95: 252-257.
6. BAUM, D. A., K. J. SYTSMA AND P C H OCH. 1994. A phylogenetic analy- sis of Epilobium (Onagraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA se- quences. Systematic Botany 19: 363-388.
7. BLAXTER, M., J. MANN, T. CHAPMAN, F. THOMAS, C. WHITTON, R. FLOYD, AND E. ABEBE. 2005. Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 360: 1935-1943.
8. BROWER, A. V. Z. 2006. Problems with DNA barcodes for species delimi- tation: 'Ten species' of Astraptes fulgerator reassessed (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Systematics and Biodiversity 4: 127-132.
9. BURNS , J. M. , D. H. JANZEN, M. HAJIBABAEI, W. HALLWACHS AND P. D. N.
10. HEBERT . 2008 . DNA barcodes and cryptic species of skipper butter- flies in the genus Perichares in Area de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 6350-6355.
11. BUKASOV, S. M. 1971. Cultivated potato species. In S. M. Bukasov [ed.], Flora of cultivated plants, vol. IX, 5- 40. Kolos, Leningrad, Russia.
12. CAMERON, S., D. RUNINOFF, AND K. WILL. 2006. Who will actually use DNA barcoding and what will it cost? Systematic Biology 55: 844-847.
13. CARON, H., S. DUMAS, G. MARQUE, C. MESSIER, E B ANDOU,R.J.PETIT AND A. KREMER . 2000 . Spatial and temporal distribution of chloroplast DNA polymorphism in a tropical tree species. Molecular Ecology 9: 1089-1098.
14. CASTILLO R AND D. M. SPOONER. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of wild potatoes, Solanum series Conicibaccata (sect. Petota). Systematic Botany 22: 45-83.
15. CHASE, M. E., R. S. COWAN, P. H. HOLLINGSWORTH C VAN DEN BERG S MANRIÑÁN, G. PETERSEN, O. SEBERG, T. JøRGSENSEN,K. M. CAMERON, M. CARINE, N. PEDERSEN T. A. J. HEDDERSON F. CONRAD, G. A. SALAZAR, J. E. RICHARDSON, M. L. HOLLINGSWORTH T. G. BARRACLOUGH, L. KELLY, AND M WILKINSON. 2007. A proposal for a standardized protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 5 6 : 295-299.
16. CHASE , M. W., N. SALAMIN M WILKINSON J. M. DUNWELL, R. P. KESANAKURTHI N HAIDAR AND V S AVOLAINEN. 2005. Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 360: 1889-1895.
17. CHO, Y., J. P. MOWER, Y.-L. QIU, AND J. D. PALMER. 2004. Mitochondrial substitution rates are extraordinarily elevated and variable in a genus of fl owering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 17741-17746.
18. CONTRERAS, A., AND D. M. SPOONER. 1999. Revision of Solanum section Etuberosum (subgenus Potatoe). In M. Nee, D. E. Symon, R. N. Lester, and J. P. Jessop [eds.], Solanaceae IV, Advances in biology and utilization, 227- 245. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
19. CORRELL, D. S. 1962. The potato and its wild relatives. Contributions from the Texas Research Foundation Botanical Studies 4: 1-606.
20. CRONQUIST A. 1978 . Once again, what is a species? In J. A. Romberger [ed.], Biosystematics in agriculture, 3- 20. Allenheld, Osman and Co., Montclair, New Jersey, USA.
21. DANIELL , H. , S. B. LEE J GREVICH C S ASKI T QUESADA-VARGAS C G UDA J T OMKINS AND R K J ANSEN. 2006. Complete chloroplast ge- nome sequences of Solanum tuberosum, Solanum lycopersicum and comparative analyses with other Solanaceae genomes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112: 1503-1518.
22. DEMPEWOLF, H., AND Q C RONK. 2008. Applying modern genomic tools to the management and characterization of plant genetic re- sources. InProceedings of Botany 2008 meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Botanical Society of America, St. Louis, Missouri, USA Website http://2008.botanyconference.org/engine/search/index. php?func=detail&aid= 914 [abstract]
23. DE QUEIROZ, K. 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology 56: 879-886.
24. DOYLE, J. J., AND J L D OYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
25. EHRLICH, P. R., AND P. H. RAVEN. 1969. Differentiation of populations. Science 165: 1228-1232.
26. FAJARDO D R CASTILLO A S ALAS AND D. M. SPOONER. 2008. A morpho- metric study of species boundaries of the wild potato Solanum series Conicibaccata : A replicated fi eld trial in Andean Peru. Systematic Botany 33: 183-192.
27. GHISLAIN , M., D. ANDRADE F. RODRÍ GUEZ , R. J. HIJMANS AND D. M. SPOONER . 2006 . Genetic analysis of the cultivated potato Solanum tuberosum L. Phureja Group using RAPDs and nuclear SSRs. The- oretical and Applied Genetics 113: 1515-1527.
28. GIANNATTASIO R., AND D. M. SPOONER. 1994a. A reexamination of spe- cies boundaries between Solanum megistacrolobum and S. toralapa- num (Solanum sect. Petota , series Megistacroloba): Morphological data. Systematic Botany 19: 89-105.
29. GIANNATTASIO R., AND D. M. SPOONER. 1994b. A reexamination of species boundaries and hypotheses hybridization concerning Solanum megistacrolobum and S. toralapanum (Solanum sect. Petota , series Megistacroloba ): Molecular data. Systematic Botany 19: 106-115.
30. GOVINDARAJU, D. R., B. D. DANCIK, AND D. B. WAGNER. 1989. Novel chloroplast DNA polymorphism in a sympatric region of two pines. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2: 49-59.
31. GRANT, V. 1981. Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
32. GRUN P. 1990 . The evolution of cultivated potatoes. In P. K. Bretting [ed.], New perspectives on the origin and evolution of new world do- mesticated plants. Economic Botany 3 (Supplement) 44: 39- 55.
33. HAJIBABAEI, M., D. H. JANZEN J. M. BURNS W HALLWACHS AND P. D. N. HEBERT . 2006 . DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 968-971.
34. HAMRICK, J. L., AND M. J. GODT . 1989 . Allozyme diversity in plant species. In A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler, and B. S. Weir [eds.], Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources, 43- 63. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
35. HARLAN, J. R., AND J. M. J. DE WET. 1971. Toward a rational classifi ca- tion of cultivated plants. Taxon 20: 509-517.
36. HARTMAN, R. L., AND B E NELSON. 1998. Taxonomic novelties from North America north of Mexico: A 20-year vascular plant diversity base- line. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 67: 1-59.
37. HAWKES, J. G. 1958. Kartoffel. I. In H. Kappert and W. Rudorf [eds.], Taxonomy, cytology and crossability. Handuch Pflanzenzucht, 2nd ed., vol. 3, 1- 43. Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany.
38. HAWKES, J. G. 1990. The potato: Evolution, biodiversity and genetic re- sources. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
39. HAWKES, J. G., AND J. P. HJERTING . 1969 . The potatoes of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay: A biosystematic study. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
40. HAWKES, J. G., AND J. P. HJERTING . 1989 . The potatoes of Bolivia: Their breeding value and evolutionary relationships. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
41. HEBERT, P. D. N., A. CYWINSKA, S. L. BALL AND J. R. DE WAARD 2003a. Biological identifi cations through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences 270: 313-321.
42. HEBERT , P. D. N. , S. RATNASINGHAM AND J. R. DE WAARD. 2003b. Barcoding animal life: Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences (Supplement) 270: S96-S99.
43. HEBERT , P. D. N., E. H. PENTON , J. M. BURNS, D. H. JANZEN AND W H ALLWACHS . 2004a . Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the Neotropical skipper butterfl y Astraptes fulgera- tor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 14812-14817.
44. HEBERT , P. D. N., M. Y. STOECKLE, T. S. ZEMLAK AND C. M. FRANCIS 2004b. Identifi cation of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biology 2: 1657-1663 [http://dx.doi.org10.1371/journal.pbio.002/].
45. HERRE, E. A. 2006. Barcoding helps biodiversity fly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 3949-3950.
46. HICKERSON, M. J., C. P. MEYER AND C M ORITZ. 2006. DNA barcoding will often fail to discover new animal species over broad parameter space. Systematic Biology 55: 729-739.
47. HOSAKA, K. 2003. T-type chloroplast DNA in Solanum tuberosum L. ssp. tuberosum was conferred from some populations of S. tarijense Hawkes. American Journal of Potato Research 80: 21-32.
48. HOSAKA K AND D. M. SPOONER . 1992 . RFLP analysis of the wild potato species, Solanum acaule Bitter ( Solanum sect. Petota). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 84: 851-858.
49. HUAM ÁN Z AND D. M. SPOONER. 2002. Reclassifi cation of landrace populations of cultivated potatoes ( Solanum sect. Petota). American Journal of Botany 89: 947-965.
50. JACOBS, M. M. J., R. G. VAN DEN BERG, V. G. A. A. VLEESHOUWERS , M. V ISSER RM ANK MS ENGERS RH OEKSTRA AND BV OSMAN 2008 . AFLP analysis reveals a lack of phylogenetic structure within Solanum section Petota. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 145: 1-12 (doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-145).
51. K RESS, W. J., AND D L E RICKSON. 2008. DNA barcodes: Genes, genom- ics, and bioinformatics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 2761-2762.
52. KRESS, W. J., K. J. WURDACK, E. A. ZIMMER L. A. WEIGT AND D. H. JANZEN 2005 . Use of DNA barcodes to identify fl owering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 8369-8374.
53. LAHAYE R M VAN DER BANK, D. BOGARIN, J. WARNER, F. PUPULIN, G. GIGOT, O. MAURIN, S. DUTHOIT, T. G. BARRACLOUGH AND V S AVOLAINEN. 2008. DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 2923- 2928.
54. LARA-CABRERA S AND D. M. SPOONER. 2004. Taxonomy of Mexican diploid wild potato ( Solanum sect. Petota ) species: AFLP data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 248: 129-142.
55. LECHNOVICH, V. S. 1971. Cultivated potato species. In S. M. Bukasov [ed.], Flora of cultivated plants, vol. IX, 41- 304. Kolos, Leningrad, Russia.
56. LEVIN, D. A. 1979. The nature of plant species. Science 204: 381-384.
57. LEVIN, D. A. 2002. The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
58. MADDISON, D. R., AND W P MADDISON. 2005. MacClade 4.08: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
59. MALLET J. 2001. Species, concepts of. In S. A. Levin [ed.], Encyclopedia of biodiversity, 427- 440. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
60. MAYR, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
61. MEIER R., K. SHIYANG G VAIDYA, AND P. K. L. NG. 2006. DNA barcoding and taxonomy in diptera: A tale of high intraspecific variability and low identifi cation success. Systematic Biology 55: 715-728.
62. MEYER, C. P., AND G. PAULAY. 2005. DNA barcoding: Error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology 3: 2229-2238.
63. MILLER, J. T., AND D. M. SPOONER. 1999. Collapse of species boundar- ies in the wild potato Solanum brevicaule complex (Solanaceae, S. sect. Petota ): Molecular data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 214: 103-130.
64. MILLER, S. E. 2007. DNA barcoding and the renaissance of taxon- omy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 4775-4776.
65. M ORITZ C., AND C CICERO. 2004. DNA barcoding: Promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biology 2: 1529-1531.
66. MORJAN, C. L., AND L. H. RIESEBERG. 2004. How species evolve collec- tively: Implications of gene fl ow and selection for the spread of advan- tageous alleles. Molecular Ecology 13: 1341-1356.
67. OCHOA , C. M. 1990 [actual release date 13 June 1991]. The potatoes of South America: Bolivia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, New York, USA.
68. OCHOA, C. M. 1999. Las papas de sudamerica: Peru (parte I). International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.
69. OKUYAMA , Y. , N. FUJII M WAKABAYASHI A KAWAKITA M ITO M W ATANABE N M URAKAMI AND M K ATO. 2005. Nonuniform con- certed evolution and chloroplast capture: Heterogeneity of observed introgression patterns in three molecular data partition phylogenies of Asian Mitella (Saxifragaceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 2 2 : 285-296.
70. OLMSTEAD, R. G. 1995. Species concepts and plesiomorphic species. Systematic Botany 20: 623-630.
71. PERALTA I S KNAPP AND D. M. SPOONER. 2005. New species of wild tomatoes ( Solanum section Lycopersicon : Solanaceae) from northern Peru. Systematic Botany 30: 424-434.
72. PERALTA I E D M SPOONER AND S KNAPP. 2008. The taxonomy of tomatoes: A revision of wild tomatoes ( Solanum section Lycopersicon) and their outgroup relatives in sections Juglandifolium and Lycopersicoides. Systematic Botany Monographs 84: 1- 186, 3 plates.
73. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
74. PRENDINI, L. 2005. Comment on "Identifying spiders through DNA bar- codes". Canadian Journal of Zoology 83: 498-504.
75. RAKER C AND D. M. SPOONER. 2002. The Chilean tetraploid cultivated potato, Solanum tuberosum , is distinct from the Andean populations: Microsatellite data. Crop Science 42: 1451-1458.
76. RIESEBERG, L. H., T. E. WOOD AND E. J. BAACK. 2006. The nature of plant species. Nature 440: 524-527.
77. RODMAN, J. E., AND J. H. CODY. 2003. The taxonomic impediment over- come: NSF ' s Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy (PEET) as a model. Systematic Biology 52: 428-435.
78. RODRÍGUEZ, A., AND D. M. SPOONER. 2002. Subspecies boundaries of the wild potatoes Solanum bulbocastanum and S. cardiophyllum based on morphological and nuclear RFLP data. Acta Mexicana 61: 9-25.
79. RODRÍGUEZ, F., AND D M S POONER. 2009. Nitrate reductase phylogeny of potato ( Solanum sect. Petota ) genomes with emphasis on the origins of the polyploid species. Systematic Botany 34: 207-219.
80. ROHWER, J. G. 2000. Towards a phylogenetic classifi cation of the Lauraceae: Evidence from matK sequences. Systematic Botany 25: 60-71.
81. ROKAS, A. 2008. Lining up to avoid bias. Science 319: 416-417.
82. RYDBERG, P. A. 1924. The section Tuberarium of the genus Solanum in Mexico and Central America. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 51: 145-154, 167-176.
83. SALAS , A. R., D. M. SPOONER Z HUAMÁN, R. V. TORRES-MAITA , R. HOEKSTRA, K. SCHÜLER, AND R. J. HIJMANS. 2001. Taxonomy and new collections of wild potato species in central and southern Peru in 1999. American Journal of Potato Research 78: 197-207.
84. SANG, T., D. J. CRAWFORD AND T. F. STUESSY. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 1120-1136.
85. S AVOLAINEN, V., R. S. COWAN A. P. VOGLER G K RODERICK AND R. LANE. 2005 . Towards writing the encyclopedia of life: An intro- duction to DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 360: 1805-1811.
86. SEIFERT, K. A., R. A. SAMSON , J. R. DEWAARD J H OUBRAKEN, C. A.
87. LÉVESQUE , J.-M. MONCALVO G LOUIS-SEIZE AND P. D. N. HEBERT 2007. Prospects for fungus identifi cation using COI DNA barcodes, with Penicillium as a test case. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 3901-3906.
88. SHI, S., H. JIN, Y. ZHONG X. HE, Y. HUANG FT AN AND D. E. BOUFFORD. 2000 . Phylogenetic relationships of the Magnoliaceae inferred from cpDNA matK sequences. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 925-930.
89. SIMMONS, M. P., AND H O CHOTERENA. 2000. Gaps as characters in se- quence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
90. SMITH, M. A., J. J. RODRIGUEZ , J. B. WHITFIELD, A. R. DEANS , D. H. JANZEN W H ALLWACHS AND P. D. N. HEBERT. 2008. Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology, and collections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 12359-12364.
91. SMITH , M. A. , D. M. WOOD , D. H. JANZEN W HALLWACHS AND P. D. N. HEBERT. 2007. DNA barcodes affi rm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid fl ies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 4967-4972.
92. SMITH, M. A., N. E. WOODLEY , D. H. JANZEN W H ALLWACHS AND P. D. N. HEBERT. 2006. DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specifi city within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid fl ies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 3657-3662.
93. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS AND B. G. MILLIGAN. 1992. Intraspecifi c chlo- roplast DNA variation: Systematic and phylogenetic implications. In P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants, 117- 150. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
94. SOLTIS , D. E., P. S. SOLTIS D. W. SCHEMSKE , J. F. HANCOCK J. N. THOMPSON, B. C. HUSBAND AND W. S. JUDD. 2007. Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: Have we grossly underestimated the number of spe- cies? Taxon 56: 13-30.
95. SONG, H., J. E. BUHAY, M. F. WHITING AND K. A. CRANDALL 2008. Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the num- ber of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coampli- fied. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 13486-13491.
96. SPOONER, D. M., G. J. ANDERSON AND R K J ANSEN. 1993. Chloroplast
97. DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes, and pepinos (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 676-688.
98. SPOONER, D. M., AND R C ASTILLO. 1997. Reexamination of series re- lationships of South American wild potatoes (Solanaceae: Solanum sect. Petota ): Evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site varia- tion. American Journal of Botany 84: 671-685.
99. SPOONER, D. M., AND A M C LAUSEN. 1993. Wild potato (Solanum sect. Petota ) germplasm collecting expedition to Argentina in 1990, and status of Argentinean potato germplasm resources. Potato Research 36: 3-12.
100. SPOONER, D. M., D. DOUCHES AND A. CONTRERAS. 1992. Allozyme variation within Solanum sect. Petota , ser. Etuberosa (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 79: 467-471.
101. SPOONER , D. M., D. FAJARDO AND G. J. BRYAN. 2007a. Species limits of Solanum berthaultii Hawkes and S. tarijense Hawkes and the impli- cations for species boundaries in Solanum sect. Petota. Taxon 56: 987-999.
102. SPOONER , D. M., D. FAJARDO AND A. SALAS. 2008a. Revision of the Solanum medians complex ( Solanum sect. Petota). Systematic Botany 33: 579-588.
103. SPOONER, D. M., K. MCLEAN G R AMSAY R W AUGH AND G. J. BRYAN 2005 . A single domestication for potato based on multilocus AFLP genotyping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 14694-14699.
104. SPOONER, D. M., J. NÚÑ EZ, G. TRUJILLO, M. DEL ROSARIO HERRERA F. GUZMÁN, AND M. GHISLAIN. 2007b. Extensive simple sequence repeat genotyping of potato landraces supports a major reevaluation of their gene pool structure and classification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 19398-19403.
105. SPOONER, D. M., F. RODRÍGUEZ, Z. POLGÁR, H. E. BALLARD JR AND S. H. JANSKY. 2008b. Genomic origins of potato polyploids: GBSSI gene sequencing data. The Plant Genome, a supplement to Crop Science 48: S27-S36.
106. SPOONER, D. M., AND A S ALAS. 2006. Structure, biosystematics, and genetic resources. In J. Gopal and S. M. P. Khurana [eds.], Handbook of potato production, improvement, and post-harvest management, 1- 39. Haworth ' s Press, Binghamton, New York, USA.
107. SPOONER D M A S ALAS Z H UAM ÁNAND R J H IJMANS. 1999. Wild po- tato collecting expedition in southern Peru (Departments of Apurímac, Arequipa, Cusco, Moquegua, Puno, Tacna) in 1998: Taxonomy and new germplasm resources. American Journal of Potato Research 76: 103-119.
108. SPOONER, D. M., AND K. J. SYTSMA. 1992. Reexamination of series rela- tionships of Mexican and Central American wild potatoes ( Solanum sect. Petota ): Evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site varia- tion. Systematic Botany 17: 432-448.
109. SPOONER , D. M., R. G. VAN DEN BERG W G ARCÍA, AND M. L. UGARTE 1994. Bolivia potato collecting expeditions 1993, 1994: Taxonomy and new germplasm resources. Euphytica 79: 137-148.
110. SPOONER, D. M., R. G. VAN DEN BERG, A. RODRÍGUEZ, J. BAMBERG, R. J. HIJMANS, AND S. I. LARA-CABRERA. 2004. Wild potatoes (Solanum section Petota ) of North and Central America. Systematic Botany Monographs 68: 1- 209, 9 plates.
111. STADEN, R. 1996. The Staden sequence analysis package. Molecular Biotechnology 5: 233-241.
112. STOECKLE , M. Y., AND P. D. N. HEBERT. 2008. Barcode of life. Scientifi c American 299: 82-88.
113. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsi- mony (*and other methods), version 4.0b3a. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
114. TATE, J. A., AND B B SIMPSON. 2003. Paraphyly of Tarasa (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploidy species. Systematic Botany 28: 723-737.
115. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1989 . The meaning of species and speciation: A genetic perspective. In D. Otte and J. A. Endler [eds.], Speciation and its consequences, 3- 37, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
116. THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON F. PLEWNIAK F. JEANMOUGIN AND D. G. HIGGINS . 1997 . The CLUSTAL-X windows interface: Flexible strate- gies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876-4882.
117. UGENT, D. 1970. The potato. Science 170: 1161-1166.
118. VALENTINI, A., F. POMPANON, AND P T ABERLET. 2009. DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 110-117.
119. VAN DEN BERG, R. G., J. T. MILLER, M. L. UGARTE J P K ARDOLUS J. VILLAND J NIENHUIS AND D. M. SPOONER. 1998. Collapse of morphological species in the wild potato Solanum brevicaule com- plex (sect. Petota). American Journal of Botany 85: 92-109.
120. VAN DEN BERG, R. G., AND D. M. SPOONER. 1992. A reexamination of infraspecific taxa of a wild potato, Solanum microdontum Bitter ( Solanum sect. Petota: Solanaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 182: 239-252.
121. VAN VALEN, L. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies and oaks. Taxon 25: 233-239.
122. VENCES, M., M. THOMAS , R. M. BONETT AND D. R. VIEITES. 2005. Deci- phering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: Chances and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 360: 1859-1868.
123. WENDEL, J. F., AND J. J. DOYLE. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: Window into genome history and molecular evolution. In D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequenc- ing, 265- 296, Chapman and Hall, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
124. WHITE, T. J., T. D. BRUNS S L EE AND J. W. TAYLOR. 1990. Amplifi cation and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phyloge- netics. In M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Shinsky, and T. J. White [eds.], PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications, 315- 322, Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
125. WHITFIELD, J. 2003. DNA barcodes catalogue animals. Nature News, 14 May 2003 [online], website http://www.nature.com/news/2003/ 030514/full/news030512-7.html.
126. WIENS , J. J., AND T. A. PENKROFT. 2002. Delimiting species using DNA and morphological variation and discordant species limits in spiny lizards ( Sceloporus). Systematic Biology 1: 69-91.
127. WILL, K. W., B. D. MISHLER AND Q. D. WHEELER. 2005. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Systematic Biology 54: 844-851.
128. WILSON, E. O. 2003. The encyclopedia of life. Trends in Ecology &Evolution 18: 77-80.
129. WINKWORTH, R. C., AND M J D ONOGHUE. 2005. Viburnum phylogeny based on combined molecular data: implications for taxonomy and biogeography. American Journal of Botany 92: 653-666.