The impact of wireless keypads in an interprofessional education context with health science students

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 337-350

  Williams, Brett ^a   Lewis, Belinda ^a   Boyle, Malcolm ^a   Brown, Ted ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH PROFESSIONS; HEALTH SCIENCE; INTERACTIVITY; INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION; LARGE LECTURE; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; PROFESSIONAL GROWTH; QUALITATIVE DATA; SELF-REPORTING; SOCIAL WORK; STUDENT INTERACTIONS; TEACHING AND LEARNING; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS;

HEALTH; SURVEYS; TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 79951876326     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01031.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Banks, D., (2003). Using keypad-based group process support systems to facilitate student reflection. Paper presented at the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Adelaide.
2. Barnett, J., (2006). Implementation of personal response units in very large lecture classes: students perceptions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 4, 474-494.
3. Bender, D., &, Ewbank, D., (1994). The focus group as a tool for health research: issues in design and analysis. Health Transition Review, 4, 1, 63-79.
4. Burnstein, R., &, Lederman, L., (2001). Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. The Physics Teacher, 39, 8-11.
5. Caldwell, J., (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. The American Society for Cell Biology, 6, 1, 9-20. (Pubitemid 46364411)
6. Draper, S., &, Brown, M., (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 2, 81-94. (Pubitemid 38883623)
7. Draper, S., Cargill, J., &, Cutts, Q., (2002). Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 18, 1, 13-23.
8. Duggan, P., Palmer, E., &, Devitt, P., (2007). Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial. BMC Medical Education, 7, 25.
9. Fleming, J., (2008). Health care workforce. In, S. Taylor, M. Foster, &, J. Fleming, (Eds), Health care practice in Australia: policy, context and innovations (pp. 103-130). South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.
10. Freeman, M., Blayney, P., &, Ginns, P., (2006). Anonymity and in class learning: the case for electronic response systems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 4, 568-580.
11. Griff, E., &, Matter, S., (2008). Early identification of at-risk students using a personal response system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 6, 1124-1130.
12. Guthrie, R., &, Carlin, A., (2004). Waking the dead: using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom. Paper presented at the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York.
13. Hall, R., Thomas, M., Collier, H., &, Hilgers, M., (2005). A student response system for increasing engagement, motivation, and learning in high enrollment lectures. Paper presented at the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, NE.
14. Hatch, J., Jensen, M., &, Moore, R., (2005). Manna from heaven or 'clickers' from hell: experiences with an electronic response system. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34, 7, 36-39.
15. Jones, C., Connolly, M., Gear, A., &, Read, M., (2001). Group interactive learning with group process support technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 5, 571-586. (Pubitemid 33670445)
16. Judson, E., &, Sawada, D., (2002). Learning from past and present: electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21, 2, 167-274.
17. Kaleta, R., &, Joosten, T., (2007). Student response systems: a University of Wisconsin system study of clickers. Boulder, CO: Educause Center for Applied Research.
18. Kennedy, G., &, Cutts, Q., (2005). The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 4, 260-268. (Pubitemid 41053300)
19. Lowery, R., (2005). Teaching and learning with interactive student response systems: a comparison of commercial products in the higher-education market. Paper presented at the Southwestern Social Science Association, New Orleans, LA.
20. McCabe, M., Heal, A., &, White, A., (2001). The integration of group response systems into teaching and LOLA, the missing link in computer assisted assessment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th CAA Conference, Loughborough, Loughborough University.
21. Mun, W. K., Hew, K. F., &, Cheung, W. S., (2009). The impact of the use of response pad system on the learning of secondary school physics concepts: a Singapore quasi-experiment study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 5, 848-860.
22. Nicol, D., &, Boyle, J., (2003). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 4, 457-473. (Pubitemid 37291695)
23. Nosek, T., Wang, W., Medvedev, I., Wile, M., &, O'Brien, T., (2006). Use of a computerized audience response system in medical student teaching: its effect on active learning and exam performance. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Education Chesapeake, VA.
24. Poulis, J., Massen, C., Robens, E., &, Gilbert, M., (1998). Physics lecturing with audience paced feedback. American Journal of Physics, 66, 5, 439-441.
25. Premkumar, K., &, Coupal, C., (2008). Rules of engagement 12 tips for successful use of 'clickers' in the classroom. Medical Teacher, 30, 2, 146-149. (Pubitemid 351942677)
26. Pritchard, D., (2006). The use of 'clicker' technology to enhance the teaching/learning experience. Otago, NZ: Otago University.
27. Robinson, S., (2007). Engaging students through electronic response devices (clickers). Management Review: An International Journal, 2, 1, 4-16.
28. Schackow, E., Chavez, M., Loya, L., &, Friedman, M., (2004). Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents. Family Medicine, 36, 7, 496-504. (Pubitemid 38924649)
29. Sharma, M., Khachan, J., Chan, B., &, O'Byrne, J., (2005). An investigation of the effectiveness of electronic classroom communication systems in large lecture classes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21, 2, 137-154.
30. Stuart, S., Brown, M., &, Draper, S., (2004). Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: one practitioner's application. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 2, 95-102. (Pubitemid 38883624)
31. Tashakkori, A., &, Teddlie C., (Eds) (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
32. Van Dijk, L., Van Den Berg, G., &, Van Keulen, H., (2001). Interactive lectures in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26, 1, 15-28. (Pubitemid 33232281)
33. Williams, J., (2003). Learning by remote control: exploring the use of an audience response system as a vehicle for content delivery. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Adelaide, SA.
34. Zhu, E., (2007). Teaching with clickers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.