Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: A randomised trial

BMC Medical Education

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Duggan, Paul M ^a   Palmer, Edward ^a   Devitt, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEM; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; ATTENTION; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; METHODOLOGY; OBSTETRICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEACHING; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ATTENTION; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COHORT STUDIES; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MALE; OBSTETRICS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; SOUTH AUSTRALIA; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 34547874244     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-25     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. In Pursuit of Meaningful Learning. Joel Michael, Adv Physiol Educ 2001 25 145 158 11824191
2. Problem-based learning in American medical education: an overview. S Donner Robert Bickley Harmon, Bull Med Libr Assoc 1993 81 3 294 298 8374585
3. Active Learning Techniques Versus Traditional Teaching Styles:Two Experiments from History and Political Science. JP McCarthy L Anderson, Innovative Higher Education 2000 24 4 279 294 10.1023/B:IHIE.0000047415.48495.05
4. The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes. GE Kennedy QI Cutts, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2005 21 260 268 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00133.x
5. Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. SW Draper MI Brown, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2004 20 81 94 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00074.x
6. Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: one practitioner's application. SAJ Stuart MI Brown SW Draper, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2004 20 95 102 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00075.x
7. Force concept inventory. D Hestenes M Wells G Swackhammer, Physics Teacher 1992 30 141 151 10.1119/1.2343497
8. A mechanics baseline test. D Hestenes M Wells, Physics Teacher 1992 30 159 168 10.1119/1.2343498
9. Assessment of an electronic voting system within the tutorial setting: a randomised controlled trial. EJ Palmer PG Devitt NJ De Young D Morris, BMC Med Educ 2005 5 24 34 16000178 10.1186/1472-6920-5-24
10. The University of Adelaide Student Experience of Learning and Teaching - Standard Teaching Evaluation. http://www.adelaide.edu.au/clpd/evaluation/ download/2007_uasdteach.pdf
11. Using audience response technology for pretest reviews in an undergraduate nursing course. PS Stein SD Challman JK Brueckner, J Nurs Educ 2006 45 11 469 73 17120866
12. Audience response system: effect on learning in Family Medicine residents. TE Schackow M Chavez L Loya M Friedman, Fam Med 2004 36 7 496 504 15243831
13. The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: An application to resident education. A Pradhan D Sparano C Ananth, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 193 1827 30 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.075 16260243
14. Absenteeism and under-achievement in final year medical students. U Dhaliwal, Natl Med J India 2003 16 1 34 7 12715956
15. [Undergraduate medical education: Students' perspective and medical school policy]. P Vinceneux C Carbon J Pouchot B Crickx D Maillard B Regnier JM Desmonts A Fontaine, Presse Med 2000 29 30 1654 7 11089505