The impact of a service-dominant focus strategy and stewardship culture on organizational innovativeness in family-owned businesses

Journal of Family Business Strategy

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 43-51

  Dibrell, Clay ^a   Moeller, Miriam ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Organizational innovativeness; Service dominant focus; Stewardship culture

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951556667     PISSN: 18778585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple Regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
2. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 1991, 17:99-120.
3. Chow G.C. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrika 1960, 28:591-605.
4. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Sharma P. Sources and consequences of distinctive familiness: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2005, 29(3):237-242.
5. Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J., Sharma P. Defining the family-owned firm by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1999, 23(4):19-39.
6. Churchill G.A. Marketing research: Methodological foundations 1995, The Dryden Press, Chicago. 6th ed.
7. Constantin J.A., Lusch R.F. Understanding resource management 1994, The Planning Forum, Oxford, OH.
8. Craig J., Dibrell C. The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study. Family Business Review 2006, 19(4):275-288.
9. Danneels E. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal 2002, 23:1095-1121.
10. Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D., Donaldson L. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review 1997, 22:20-47.
11. Dibrell C. Life settlements from the perspective of institutional, real options, and stewardship theories. Family Business Review 2010, 23:94-98.
12. Dyer W.G., Dyer W.J. Family capital, family business, and free enterprise. Family Business Review 2009, 22:193-195.
13. Eddleston K.A., Kellermanns F.W., Sarathy R. Resource configurations in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies 2008, 45(1):26-50.
14. Fornell C., Larker D. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Journal of Marketing Research 1981, 18(1):39-50.
15. Gopinath M., Roe T.L., Shane M.D. Competitiveness of U.S. food processing: Benefits from primary agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1996, 78(4):1044-1055.
16. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E. Multivariate data analysis 2010, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 7th ed.
17. Harmsen H., Grunert K.G., Declerck F. Why did we make that cheese? An empirically based framework for understanding what drives innovation activity. Research and Development Management 2000, 30(2):151-166.
18. Hult G.T.M., Hurley R.F., Knight G.A. Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management 2004, 33(5):429-438.
19. Jaccard J., Turrisi R. Interaction effects in multiple regression 2003, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA. 2nd ed.
20. James L., Mulaik S., Brett J. Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data 1982, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
21. Le Breton-Miller I., Miller D. Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 2010, 33:1169-1191.
22. Lomax R.G. Statistical concepts: A second course for education and the behavioral sciences 1992, Longman, White Plains, NY.
23. Lusch R.F., Vargo S.L., Wessels G. Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: Contributions from service-dominant logic. IBM Systems Journal 2008, 47:5-14.
24. Madhavaram S., Hunt S.D. The service-dominant logic and a hierarchy of operant resources: Developing masterful operant resources and implications for marketing strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2008, 36(1):67-82.
25. Menguc B., Auh S. Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences 2006, 34(1):63-73.
26. Nager R.W., Aronoff C.E., Ward J.L. American family business survey 1995, Arthur Andersen Center for Family Business, Houston, TX.
27. Narver J.C., Slater S.F. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing 1990, 54(4):20-35.
28. Ngo L.V., O'Cass A. Creating value offerings via operant resource-based capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management 2009, 38(1):45-59.
29. Ordanini A., Maglio P.P. Market orientation, internal process, and external network: A qualitative comparative analysis of key decisional alternatives in the new service development. Decision Sciences 2009, 40:601-625.
30. Paswan A., D'Souza D., Zolfagharian M.A. Toward a contextually anchored service innovation typology. Decision Sciences 2009, 40:513-540.
31. Penrose E. The theory of the growth of the firm 1959, Basil Blackwell, London.
32. Podsakoff P., Organ D.M. Self reports in organizational research. Journal of Management 1986, 12(4):531-544.
33. Post J.E. The greening of the Boston Park Plaza Hotel. Family Firm Review 1993, 6(2):131-148.
34. Ram M., Holliday R. Relative merits: Family culture and kinship in small firms. Sociology 1993, 27(4):629-648.
35. Rathmell J.M. What is meant by services?. Journal of Marketing 1966, 30(October):32-36.
36. Schulze W.G., Lubatkin M.H., Dino R.N., Buchholtz A.K. Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science 2001, 12:99-116.
37. Schulze W.S., Lubatkin M.H., Dino R.N. Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal 2003, 46:179-194.
38. Schwab A., Miner A.S. Learning in hybrid-project systems: The effects of project performance on repeated collaboration. Academy of Management Journal 2008, 51:1117-1149.
39. Sweeney J.C. Moving towards the service dominant logic-A comment. Australasian Marketing Journal 2007, 15(1):97-104.
40. Vargo S.L. On a theory of markets and marketing: From positively normative to normatively positive. Australasian Marketing Journal 2007, 15(1):53-60.
41. Vargo S., Lusch R.F. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing 2004, 68(1):1-17.
42. Vargo S., Lusch R.F. Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2008, 36(1):1-10.
43. Zahra S., Neubaum D., Hayton J., Dibrell C., Craig J. Culture of family commitment and strategic flexibility: The moderating effect of stewardship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 2008, 32:1035-1054.
44. Zahra S.A., Hayton J.C., Salvato C. Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2004, 28(4):363-381.
45. Zimmermann E.W. World resources and industries 1951, Harper and Brothers, New York.