Vulnerability to influence: A two-way street

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 50-52

  Henderson, Gail E ^a   Davis, Arlene M ^a   King, Nancy M P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RELATION; NOTE; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

CHILD; CLINICAL TRIALS; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 28244487219     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160490497371     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Emerson, R. M. 1976. Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology 2:335-362.
2. Henderson, G. E., N. M. P. King, L. R. Churchill, B. S. Wilfond, and A. M. Davis. 2004. The social construction of benefit in gene transfer research. University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, available from: http://socialmedicine. med.unc.edu/scob
3. King, N. M. P. 2000. Defining and describing benefit appropriately in clinical trials. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 28(4):332-343.
4. Kopelman, L. M. 2002. Pediatric research regulations under legal scrutiny: Grimes narrows their interpretation. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 30(1): 38-49.
5. Levine, C., R. Faden, C. Grady, D. Hammerschmidt, L. Eckenwiler, and J. Sugarman. 2004. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants. The American Journal of Bioethics 4(3): 44-49.
6. Molm, L. D., N. Takahashi, and G. Peterson. 2000. Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology 105(5): 1396-1427.
7. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. 1998. Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity. Volume I: Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Rockville, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
8. Nelson, R. M., and J. F. Merz. 2002. Voluntariness of consent for research: An empirical and conceptual review. Medical Care 40(9)Suppl.: V69-V80.
9. Shah, S., A. Whittle, B. Wilfond, G. Gensler, and D. Wendler. 2004. How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research? Journal of the American Medical Association 291(4): 476-482.
10. Shamoo, A. E., and C. A. Tauer. 2002. Ethically questionable research with children: The fenfluramine study. Accountability in Research 9(3-4): 143-166.