Integrity in research

Seminars in Hearing

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 87-97

  Jones, Sherri M ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL WELFARE; ETHICS; POLICY; RESEARCH; RESPONSIBILITY; REVIEW; SCIENCE;

EID: 0034005788     PISSN: 07340451     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Advisers of the Nation. [On-line, March 16, 1999]. Available: http://www.nas.edu/ about/about.html
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). [On-line, 1999]. Available: http://www.aaas.org/
3. Appelbaum, P.S. (1996). Examining the ethics of human subjects research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 6, 283-287.
4. Berg, K., & Tranoy, K.E. (Eds.). (1982). Research ethics. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.
5. Bird, S.J., & Spier, R. (Eds.) (1995). Science and engineering ethics. Guildford, UK: Opragen Publications.
6. Bulger, R.E., Heitman, E., & Reiser, S.J. (Eds.) (1993). The ethical dimensions of the biological sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Center for Research Ethics. [On-line, 1998]. Available: http://www.cre.gu.se/
8. Committee on Genetics, Health and Behavior, Institute of Medicine. (1999). Genetics, health and behavior: Science in perspective. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. Committee on Science. (1998). Unlocking our future: Toward a new national science policy. (Committee Print 105-B). U.S. House of Representatives, 105th Congress.
10. Committee on Science (COS), Engineering and Public Policy, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. (1995). On being a scientist: Responsible conduct in research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1989a). Responsibility of PHS awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science. Federal Register 54 (August 8), 32449, codified as 42 CFR Part 50 Subpart A.
12. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1989b). Misconduct in scientific research. Washington, DC: Office of Inspector General. OAI-88-07-00420.
13. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1991). Protection of human subjects. Federal Register 56 (June 18), 28003; Federal Register 40 (August 8, 1975), 33528; Federal Register 43 (January 11, 1978), 1758; Federal Register 43 (November 3, 1978), 51559; Federal Register 43 (November 16, 1978) 53655; Federal Register 48 (March 8, 1983) 9818; Federal Register 56 (June 18), 28032; codified as 45 CFR Part 46 Subparts A,B,C,D.
14. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1992). Guidelines for the conduct of research within the public health services. Washington, DC: Public Health Service.
15. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1993). Office of Research Integrity: An introduction. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service.
16. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1994). Hearing procedures for scientific misconduct. Federal Register 59 (June 9), 29809.
17. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Commission on Research Integrity. (1995a). Integrity and misconduct in research. Final report, November 3. Washington, DC: DHHS.
18. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1995b). Objectivity in research. Federal Register 60 (July 11), 35809-35819.
19. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Office of Research Integrity. (1997). Annual report 1997. Washington, DC: DHHS.
20. Dworkin, G. (1983). Fraud and science. In K. Berg, & K.E. Tranoy (Eds.), Research ethics (pp. 65-74). New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.
21. Edsall, J. (1995). On the hazards of whistle blowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists of our time. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1, 329-340.
22. Executive Order 12881. (1993). Establishment of the National Science and Technology Council. Federal Register 58 (November 26).
23. Executive Order 12975. (1995). Protection of human research subjects and creation of national bioethics advisory commission. Federal Register 60 (October 5), 52063-52065.
24. Folkins, J.W., Gorga, M.P., Luschei, E.S., Vetter, D.K., &Watson, C.S. (1993). The use of nonhuman animals in speech, language, and hearing research. ASHA, April, 57-65.
25. Fox, M.A. (1986). The case for animal experimentation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26. Frankel, M.S., Fowler, A., Reiner, C., & Butaney, K. (Eds.) (1998). Professional Ethics Report. Washington, DC: AAAS, Scientific Freedom, Responsibility, and Law Program. [On-line]. Available: http://www.aaas.org/ spp/dspp/sfrl/sfrl.htm
27. Grodin J.A., & Glantz, L.H. (Eds.). (1994). Children as research subjects. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Illinois Institute of Technology, Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Code of Ethics Online Project. National Science Foundation. [On-line, June 1996]. Available: http://csep.iit.edu/codes/
29. Integrity in Scientific Research: Five Video Vignettes. (1996). Washington, DC: AAAS Directorate for Science and Policy Programs.
30. Kevles, D. (1998). The Baltimore case. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
31. Lederer, S.E., & Grodin, M.A. (1994). Historical overview: Pediatric experimentation. In M.A. Grodin, & L.H. Glantz (Eds.), Children as research subjects (pp. 1-25). New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Lubalin, J.S., Ardini, M.E., & Matheson, J.L. (1995). Consequences of whistleblowing for the whistleblower in misconduct in science cases. Final report. (Contract No. 282-92-0045). Washington, DC: Research Triangle Institute.
33. Lubalin, J.S., Matheson, J.L., & Ardini, M.E. (1996). Survey of accused but exonerated individuals in research misconduct cases. Final report. (Contract No. 282-92-0045). Washington, DC: Research Triangle Institute.
34. Macrina, F.L. (1995). Scientific integrity: An introductory text with cases. Washington, DC: ASM Press.
35. McNeill, P.M. (1993). The ethics and politics of human experimentation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Myers, E.N., & Donaldson, W.F. (1993). Editorial fairness and the "Cantekin affair." Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 12, 265-267.
37. National Academy of Sciences (NAS). (1992). National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process, Vol I Washington, DC. National Academy Press.
38. National Academy of Sciences (NAS). (1993). Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process, Vol. II. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
39. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (1996). Semiannual report, April 1, 1996 - September 30, 1996. Office of Inspector General. [On-line]. Available: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oig/hg/sa r996/
40. National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC). (1998a). Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity. [On-line, July 6, 1999]. Available: http://bioethics. gov/capacity/TOC.htm
41. National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC). (1998b). The use of human biological materials in research: Ethical issues and policy guidance. Draft. [On-line, July 6, 1999]. Available: http://bioethics.gov/ briefings/index.html#jan99
42. National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC). (1999a). Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity. Executive summary. Federal Register 64 (February 19), 8376-8380.
43. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (1999b). Summary of Preliminary Findings: Adequacy of Federal Protections for Human Subjects in Research. Memo accompanying letter to President Clinton (dated May 4, 1999). [On-line]. Available: http://bioethics.gov/finalmay3.pdf
44. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. [On-line, June 8, 1998]. Available, http://www.nih.gov/ grants/oprr/humansubjects/guidance/bel mont.htm
45. National Institutes of Health (NIH), Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration. (1998). Reminder and update: Requirement for programs on the responsible conduct of research in National Research Service Award institutional training programs. In R.E. Bulger, E. Heitman, & S.J. Reiser (Eds.), The ethical dimensions of the biological sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted from NIH Guide, 19, 1, 1990).
46. National Institutes of Health (NIH), Office for Protection from Research Risks. (1996). Public health service policy on the humane care and use of laboratory animals. Bethesda, MD: NIH.
47. National Research Council (NRC). (1989). Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research. The responsible conduct of research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
48. National Science and Technology Council (NSTC). (March 15, 1999a). CS charter page. [On-line]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/NSTC/html/ committee/cs_purpose.html
49. National Science and Technology Council (NSTC Web page). (March 15, 1999b). [On-line]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/ WH/EOP/OSTP/NSTC/html/NSTC_ Home.html
50. National Science Board (NSB). (March 15, 1999). About the National Science Board. [On-line]. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/ aboutnsb.htm
51. National Science Foundation (NSF). (1991). Misconduct in science and engineering; final rule. Federal Register 56 (May 14), 22286-22290.
52. National Science Foundation (NSF). (March 15, 1999). Office of Inspector General home page. [On-line]. Available: http://www.nsf. gov/oig/oig.htm
53. National Science Foundation (NSF). (1995). WWW Ethics Center for Engineering and Science. [On-line]. Available: http://onlinethics.org/
54. Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR). (January 23, 1997). Compliance oversight procedures. [On-line]. Available: www.nih.gov/grants/oprr/oprrcomp.htm
55. Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR). (March 13, 1998). Functional statement. [On-line]. Available: http://www.nih. gov/grants/oprr/oprrstmnt.htm
56. Office of Research Integrity (ORI). (1993). ORINewsletter, Rockville, MD: ORI.
57. Office of Research Integrity (ORI). (1995). ORI guidelines for institutions and whistleblowers: Responding to possible retaliation against whistleblowers in extramural research. Washington, DC: DHHS. [On-line]. Available: http://ori.dhhs.gov/guidlin.htm
58. Office of Research Integrity (ORI). (1997). Promoting integrity in research (fact sheet). [On-line]. Available: http://ori.dhhs.gov/ 970228.htm
59. Office of Research Integrity (ORI). (March 12, 1999). Which Office Handles . . . intro to ORI. [On-line]. Available: http://ori.dhhs. gov/offices.htm
60. Office of Research Integrity (ORI). (1997a). Model policy for responding to allegations of scientific misconduct. Washington, DC: DHHS. [On-line]. Available: http://ori.dhhs.gov/PDF/mod-pol.pdf
61. Office of Research Integrity (ORI). (1997b). Model procedures for responding to allegations of scientific misconduct. Washington, DC: DHHS. [On-line]. Available: http://ori.dhhs.gov/PDF/mod_proc.pdf
62. Pannbacker, M., Lass, N.J., & Middleton, G.F. (1993). Ethics education in speech-language pathology and audiology training programs. ASHA April, 53-55.
63. Penslar, R.L. (Ed.). (1995). Research ethics: Cases and materials. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
64. Petersdoff, R.G. (1993). The pathogenesis of fraud in medical science. In R.E. Bulger, E. Heitman, & S.J. Reiser (Eds.), The ethical dimensions of the biological sciences (pp. 95-98). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted from Annals of Internal Medicine, 104, 252-254, 1986.)
65. Phinney, C. (1991). Toward some scientific objectivity in the investigation of scientific misconduct. Presentation at the DPR Symposium, "Whistleblowers, Advocates and the Law," American Chemical Society Meeting, New York City, August 27, 1991. [On-line]. Available: http://www.nyx.net/ wstewart/Articles/Phin27Aug91.html
66. Pimple, K.D. (1997). Defining misconduct in science: Some reflections on the American experience. [On-line Trends, 4(2).]. Available: http://www.indiana.edu/~poynter/ tre4-2a.html
67. Reiser, S.J. (1993). The ethics movement in the biological sciences: A new voyage of discovery. In R.E. Bulger, E. Heitman, & S.J. Reiser (Eds.), The ethical dimensions of the biological sciences (pp. 1-15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68. Rennie, D. (1991). The Cantekin affair. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 3333-3337.
69. Resnick, D.B. (1998). The ethics of science. London: Routledge.
70. Ryan, K.J. (1996). Commission on research integrity report sparks debate on science and ethics. Professional Ethics Report, 9(2), 1-4.
71. Schrader-Frechette, K. (1994). Ethics of scientific research. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
72. Sigma Xi. (1998). [On-line]. Available: http://www.sigmaxi.org/
73. Silverman, F.H. (1983). Legal aspects of speech-language pathology and audiology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
74. Sigma Xi Research Triangle Park Chapter. (1991). Ethical Issues in Scientific Research. Easley, SC: Telemedia.
75. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1993). Biomedical ethics in US public policy-background paper, OTA-BP-BBS-105 (pp. 1-24). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
76. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). (June 16, 1999). Animal care home page. [On-line]. Available: http://www.aphis. usda.gov/ac/
77. Veatch, R.M., & Spicer, C.M. (Eds.). (1991). Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
78. Whitbeck, C. (1995b). Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1, 299-308.
79. Whitbeck, C. (1995a). Trustworthy research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1, 322-328. Editorial introduction.
80. Woolf, P.K. (1993). Pressure to publish and fraud in science. In R.E. Bulger, E. Heitman, & S.J. Reiser (Eds.), The ethical dimensions of the biological sciences (pp. 95-98). Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted from Annals of Internal Medicine, 104, 254-256, 1986.)