Addressing nurses' ethical concerns about research in critical care settings

Nursing Administration Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-75

  Alt White, Anna C ^a,b   Pranulis, Maryann F ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^b M F Pranulis and Assoc   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical care; Ethics; Nursing; Research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHICS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH ETHICS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CRITICAL CARE; ETHICS, NURSING; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33646184572     PISSN: 03639568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006216-200601000-00010     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Eastwood S, Derish P, Leash E, Ordway S. Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey. Sci Eng Ethics. 1996;2:89-114.
2. Emanuel EJ, Wood A, Fleischman A, et al. Oversight of human participants research: identifying problems to evaluate reform proposals. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:282-291.
3. Federman DD, Hanna KE, Rodriguez LL, eds. In: Responsible Research: A Systems Approach to Protecting Research Participants. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press; 2002:130.
4. Edgar H, Rothman DJ. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation. Milbank Q. 1995;73:480-506.
5. Kim DT, Spivey WH. A retrospective analysis of institutional review board and informed consent practices in EMS research. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23(1):70-74.
6. Levine RJ. Editorial. Research in emergency situations: the role of deferred consent. JAMA. 1995;273(9):1300-1302.
7. Thewes J, FitzGerald D, Sulmasy DP. Informed consent in emergency medicine: ethics under fire. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1996;14:245-254.
8. Koschnitske L, McCracken S, Pranulis MF. Issues in clinical nursing research: ethical considerations for quality assurance versus scientific research. West J Nurs Res. 1992;14:392-396.
9. Pranulis MF, Koschnitske L. Issues in clinical nursing research: establishing guidelines for determining whether a potential study is a quality assessment study or scientific research. West J Nurs Res. 1993;15:258-262.
10. Pranulis MF. Issues in clinical nursing research: protecting the rights of human subjects.West J Nurs Res. 1996;18:474-478.
11. Pranulis MF. Issues in clinical nursing research: nurses' roles in protecting human subjects. West J Nurs Res. 1997;19:130-136.
12. Office for Protection from Research Risks. Special cases of subjects. In: Protecting Human Research Subjects: Institutional Review Board Guidebook. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1993:chap 6, sect 6.1-6.74.
13. Faul F, Erdfelder E. Power: Apriori, Post-hoc, and Compromise Power Analysis for MS-DOS [computer program]. Bonn, Germany: Department of Psychology, Bonn University; 1992.
14. Kalichman MV, Friedman PJ. A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics. Acad Med. 1992;67:769-775.
15. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2000;283:2701-2711.
16. Institute of Medicine. Responsible research: A systems approach to protecting research participants. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, The National Academies Press; 2002.
17. Rennie D. Editorial. Scientific misconduct: new definition, procedures, and office - perhaps a new leaf. JAMA. 1993;269:915-917.
18. Wocial LD. The role of mentors in promoting integrity and preventing scientific misconduct in nursing research. J Prof Nurs. 1995;11:276-280.
19. Sachs CA, Siegler M. Teaching scientific integrity and the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med. 1993;68:871-875.
20. Lenz ER, Ketefian S. Promoting scientific integrity in nursing research, part I: current approaches in doctoral programs. J Prof Nurs. 1995;11:213-219.
21. Martin PA. Responsibilities when a patient is a research subject. Appl Nurs Res. 1994;7:158-161.