Research ethics 101: The responsible conduct of research

Seminars in Speech and Language

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 323-337

  Costello Ingham, Janis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Research ethics; Research misconduct; Responsible conduct of research; Scientific fraud

Indexed keywords

CASE STUDY; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT RIGHT; PEER REVIEW; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; REVIEW;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY;

EID: 0346339705     PISSN: 07340478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-815585     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Teich AH, Frankel, MS. Good Science and Responsible Scientists. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science; 1992
2. Sheets MD. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings. Croatian Med J 1999;40:321-325
3. Resnik DB. The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. London: Routledge; 2001
4. Munck AU. Examples of scientific misconduct. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England; 1997:31-33
5. Woolf PK. Pressure to publish and fraud in science. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England; 1997:141-145
6. Racker E. A view of misconduct in science. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England; 1997:34-42
7. Darley FL, Aronson AE, Brown JR. Clusters of deviant speech dimensions in the dysarthrias. J Speech Hear Res 1969;12:246-269
8. Bishop DVM, Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Bishop SJ. Auditory temporal processing impairment: neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999;42:1295-1310
9. Ingham RJ, Kilgo M, Ingham JC, Moglia R, Belknap H, Sanchez T. Evaluation of a stuttering treatment based on reduction of short phonation intervals. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001;44:1229-1244
10. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Hayes RB. Evidence-Based Medicine. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingston; 2000
11. Ingham JC. Evidence-based treatment and stuttering. Presentation at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention, Atlanta, GA, November 2002
12. Office of Research Integrity (ORI). PHS policy on instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR). Available at: http://ori.dhhs. gov/
13. Kalichman MW. The online resource for instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Available at: http://rcr.ucsd.edu. Accessed February 23, 2003
14. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Responsibility of PHS awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science. Federal Register 54 (August 8), 32449, codified as 42 CFR Part 50 Subpart A (1989a).
15. Office of Research Integrity (ORI). Federal definition not effective yet. Available at: http://ori.dhhs. gov/html/news/fedreg76260.asp. Accessed December 6, 2000
16. Jones SM. Integrity in research. Semin Hear 2000; 21;87-96
17. Dartmouth College, Committee on Sources, sources: their use and acknowledgment, 1998. Available at: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sources/. Accessed September 7, 1998
18. Bailar JC III. Science, statistics, and deception. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England; 1997:113-116
19. The Nuremberg Code. JAMA 1996;276:1691
20. World Medical Association. The Helsinki Declaration: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000. Available at: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/17-c_e.html
21. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1979
22. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1991). Protection of human subjects. Federal Register 56 (June 18), 28003; Federal Register 40 (August 8, 1975), 33528; Federal Register 43 (January 11, 1978), 1758; Federal Register 43 (November 3, 1978), 51559; Federal Register 43 (November 16, 1978) 53655; Federal Register 48 (March 8, 1983) 9818; Federal Register 56 (June 18), 28032; codified as 45 CFR Part 46 Subparts A, B, C, D. Available at: http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs. gov/polasur.htm
23. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2000;283:2701-2711
24. Stern JE, Lomax K. Human experimentation. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England; 1997:286-306
25. J Speech Lang Hear Res. Information for authors. 2003
26. Werhane P, Doering J. Conflicts of interest and conflicts of commitment. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England; 1997:165-192
27. Weil V, Arzbaecher R. Relationships in laboratories and research communities. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England; 1997:69-92
28. Krulwich TA, Friedman PJ. Integrity in the education of researchers. Acad Med 1993;68(suppl):S14-S19
29. Ringel RL. A case for the doctoral consortia model in communication sciences and disorders: less is better and may even lead to more. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders, April 2003, Albuquerque, NM.
30. Berger E, Gert B. Institutional responsibility. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England; 1997:197-212
31. McCutchen CW. Peer review: Treacherous servant, disastrous master. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England; 1997:151-160
32. Office of Research Integrity (ORI). Updated November 26, 2001. Available at: http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/misconduct/whistleblowers.asp. Accessed ???
33. Wenger NS, Korenman SG, Berk R, Berry S. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives. J Invest Med 1997;45:371-380.
34. Time Magazine. 2002 Persons of the Year. December 22, 2002
35. Kalichman MW, Friedman PJ. A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics. Acad Med 1992;67:769-775
36. Eastwood S, Derish P, Leash E, Ordway S. Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey. Sci Eng Ethics 1996;2:89-114
37. Brown S, Kalichman MW. Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: a survey of graduate students in experimental sciences. Sci Eng Ethics 1998;4:487-498
38. Amato I, Rustum Roy: PR is a better system than peer review. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England; 1997:148-150
39. Motluk A. Cutting out stuttering. New Scientist 1997;153:32
40. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Updated October, 2001 Available at: http://www.icmje.org/
41. Bailey BJ. What is an author? Laryngoscope 2001; 110:1787-1788
42. Pfeffer C, Olsen BR. Editorial. J Neg Results Biomed 2002;1
43. Ingham RJ, Fox PT, Ingham JC, et al. Functional-lesion investigation of developmental stuttering with positron emission tomography. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:1208-1227
44. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Code of Ethics (revised). ASHA supplement 23. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2003. Available at: http://www.professional.asha.org/resources/deskrefs/. Accessed ???
45. Tudor, M. An experimental study of the effect of evaluative labeling on speech fluency. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Iowa, 1939
46. Dryer J. Theory improved treatment and understanding of stuttering. The San Jose Mercury News, June 11, 2001
47. Ambrose NG, Yairi E. The Tudor Study: Data and ethics. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2002;11:190-203
48. Reynolds G. The stuttering doctor's "Monster Study." New York Magazine 2003;March 16:36-39, 83, 87, 90