Contributions made by occupational therapists in RtI: A pilot study

Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 3-10

  Cahill, Susan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Early intervening services; Response to intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551527137     PISSN: 19411243     EISSN: 19411251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19411241003683771     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2008a). FAQ on response to intervention for schoolbased occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants. Bethesda, MD: Author.
2. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2008b). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (2nd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 625-683.
3. Ardon, S., Witt, J., Connell, J., & Koenig, J. (2005). Application of a three-tiered response to intervention model for instructional planning, decision making, and the identification of children in need of services. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 362-380.
4. Barnett, D. W., Daly, E. J. III, Jones, K. M., & Lentz, F. E. Jr. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions for single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity. Journal of Special Education, 38, 66-79.
5. Cahill, S. (2007, September). A perspective on response to intervention. School System Special Interest Section Quarterly, 14, 1-4.
6. Cahill, S., Daniel, D., Nelson-Stitt, M. J., Brager, S., Dostal, A. & Hirter, S. (2009). Creating partnerships to promote health and wellness in children. OT Practice, 14(6), 10-13.
7. Case-Smith, J. (2002). Effectiveness of school-based occupational therapy intervention on handwriting. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 17-25.
8. Chandler, L. K., & Dahlquist, C. M. (2002). Assumptions and goals of functional assessments. In Functional assessment: Strategies to prevent and remediate challenging behavior in school setting (pp. 25-39). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Coleman, R., Buysse, V., & Neitzel, J. (2006). Recognition and response: An early intervening system for young children at-risk for learning disabilities (Full Report). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, FPG Child Development Institute.
10. Fletcher, J., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to Intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 30-37.
11. Forsyth, K., & Kviz, F. J. (2006). Survey research design. In G. Kielhofner (Ed.), Research in occupational therapy (pp. 91-109). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
12. Frolek Clark, G., Brouwer, A., Schmidt, C., & Alexander, M. (2008). Response to intervention model: Using the Print Tool to develop a collaborative plan. OT Practice, 13, 9-13.
13. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Bryant, J. D., Hamlett, C. L., & Seethaler, P. M. (2007). Mathematics screening and progress monitoring at first grade: Implications for responsiveness to intervention. Exceptional Child, 73, 311-330.
14. Henry, D., Ecker, C., Glennon, T., & Herzberg, D. (2009). Using the Sensory Processing Measure (SPM) in multiple practice areas. OT Practice, 14(10), 9-13.
15. Jackson, L., & Arbesman, M. (Eds). (2005). Occupational therapy practice guidelines for children with behavioral and psychosocial needs. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press
16. Kiss, D. (2007). Handwriting consultation in elementary schools. OT Practice, 12, 11-14.
17. Kovaleski, J. F., & Glew, M. C. (2006). Bringing instructional support teams to scale. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 16-25.
18. McIntyre, L. L, & Phaneuf, L. K. (2008). A three-tier model of parent education in early childhood: Applying a problem-solving model. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 214-222.
19. McMaster, K. L., Kung, S. H., Han, I., & Cao, M. (2008). Peer-assisted learning strategies: A "Tier 1" approach to promoting English learners' response to intervention. Exceptional Children, 74, 194-214.
20. National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementations. Alexandria, VA: Author.
21. National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems. (2006). Preventing disproportionality by strengthening district policies and procedures: An assessment of strategic planning process. Retrieved March 1, 2008, from http://www.urbanschools.org/professional/tools.attachment/district_rubric_final/district_RUBRIC_FINAL.pdf
22. Nelson, J. R., Stage, S. A., Epstein, M. H., & Pierce, C. D. (2005). Effects of a prereading intervention on the literacy and social skills of children. Exceptional Children, 72, 29-45.
23. Shepherd, J., & Hanft, B. (2008). Team faces and spaces. In B. Hanft & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Collaborating for student success: A guide for school-based occupational therapy. (pp. 35-72). Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press.
24. Swinth, Y., Spencer, K. C., & Jackson, L. L. (2007). Occupational therapy: Effective school-based practices within a policy context (COPSSE Document Number OP-3). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education.
25. U. S. Department of Education (2007). Questions and answers on response to intervention (RTI) and early intervening services (EIS)-Question E-3 [Q&A Corner]. Retrieved March 1, 2008, from http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2Cdynamic%2CQaCorner%2C8%2C
26. VanDerHeyden, A., Witt, J. C., & Barnett, D. A. (2005). The emergence and possible futures of response to intervention. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 339-361.