The effects of shared peptides on protein quantitation in label-free proteomics by LC/MS/MS

Journal of Proteome Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 164-169

  Jin, Shuangshuang ^a   Daly, Donald S ^b   Springer, David L ^b   Miller, John H ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mass spectrometry; Protein families; Proteomics; Shared peptides

Indexed keywords

CIGARETTE SMOKE; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE; PEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; LUNG PARENCHYMA; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; LUNG; MICE; PEPTIDES; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

MUS;

EID: 38649129756     PISSN: 15353893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/pr0704175     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aebersold, R.; Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003, 422, 198-207.
2. Bondarenko, P. V.; Chelius, D.; Shaler, T. A. Identification and relative quantitation of protein mixtures by enzymatic digestion followed by capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 4741-4749.
3. Johnson, R. S.; Davis, M. T.; Taylor, J. A.; Patterson, S. D. Informatics for protein identification by mass spectrometry. Methods 2005, 35 (3), 223-236.
4. Clauser, K.; Baker, P.; Burlingame, A. Role of accurate mass measurement (±10 ppm) in protein identification strategies employing MS or MS/MS and database searching. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 2871-2882.
5. Field, H. I.; Fenyo, D.; Beavis, R. C. A bioinformatics solution that automates proteome mass spectral analysis, optimizes protein identification, and archives data in a relational database. Proteomics 2002, 2, 36-47.
6. Perkins, D.; Pappin, D.; Creasy, D.; Cottrell, J. Probability-based protein identification by searching database using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551-3567.
7. Eng, J. K.; McCormack, A. L.; Yates, J. R., III. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with mino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5, 976-989.
8. Geer, L. Y.; Markey, S. P.; Kowalak, J. A.; Wagner, L.; Xu, M.; Maynard, D. M.; Yang, X.; Shi, W.; Bryant, S. H. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3, 958-964.
9. Craig, R.; Beavis, R. C. A method for reducing the time required to match protein sequences with tandem mass spectra. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17, 2310-2316.
10. Ma, B.; Zhang, K.; Hendrie, C.; Liang, C.; Li, M.; Doherty-Kirby, A.; Lajoie, G. PEAKS: Powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17, 2337-2342.
11. Dancik, D.; Addona, T.; Clauser, K.; Vath, J.; Pevzner, P. De novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry. J. Comput. Biol. 1999, 6, 327-342.
12. Taylor, J. A.; Johnson, R. S. Sequence database searches via de novo peptide sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 11, 067-1075.
13. Searle, B. C.; Dasari, S.; Turner, M.; Reddy, A. P.; Choi, D.; Wilmarth, P. A.; McCormack, A. L.; David, L. L.; Nagalla, S. R. High-throughput identification of proteins and unanticipated sequence modifications using a mass-based alignment algorithm for MS/MS de novo sequencing results. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 2220-2230.
14. Shevchenko, A.; Sunyaev, S.; Loboda, A.; Shevchenko, A.; Bork, P.; Ens, W.; Standing, K. G. Charting the proteomics of organisms with unsequenced genomes by MALDI-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and BLAST homology searching. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 1917-1926.
15. Mackey, A. J.; Haystead, T. A. J.; Pearson, W. R. Getting more from less: Algorithms for rapid protein identification with multiple short peptide sequences. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2002, 1, 139-147.
16. Keller, A.; Nesvizhskii, A. I.; Kolker, E.; Abersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5383-5392.
17. Nesvizhskii, A. I.; Aebersold, R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1419-1440.
18. Nesvizhskii, A. I.; Keller, A.; Kolker, E.; Aebersold, R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4646-4658.
19. Old, W. M.; Meyer-Arendt, K.; Aveline-Wolf, L.; Pierce, K. G.; et al. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shortgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1487-1502.
20. Zhang, B.; VerBeckmoes, N. C.; Langston, M. A.; Uberbacher, E.; et al. Detecting differential and correlated protein expression in label-free shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 2909-2918.
21. Fang, R.; Elias, D. A.; Monroe, M. E.; Shen, Y.; et al. Differential label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of shewanella oneidensis cultured under aerobic and suboxic conditions by accurate mass and time tag approach. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 714-725.
22. Lee, K. M.; Renne, R. A.; Harbo, S. J.; Blessing, J. C.; et al. Pulmonary response of AKR/J mice exposed to LPS and/or cigarette smoke for up to 3-weeks via nose only inhalation. Toxicologist 2006, 90, 340.
23. Lee, K. M.; Renne, R. A.; Harbo, S. J.; Blessing, J. C.; et al. 3-week inhalation exposure to cigarette smoke and/or lipopolysaccharide in AKR/J mice. Inhalation Toxicol. 2007, 19, 23-35.
24. Springer, D. L.; Johnson, R. E.; Daly, D. S.; et al. Protein profile changes in mouse lung after inhalation exposure to Lipopolysaccharide and/or cigarette smoke by high-throughput quantitative mass spectrometry, submitted for publication.
25. Pinheiro J. C.; Bates D. M. Mixed Effects Models in S and S-Plus, Springer Verlag: NewYork, 2000.
26. Strittmatter, E. F.; Kangas, L. J.; Petritis, K.; et al. Application of peptide retention time information is a discriminant function for peptide identification by tandem mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3, 760-769.
27. Smith, R. D.; Anderson, G. A.; Lipton, M. S.; Pasa-Tolic, L.; et al. An accurate mass tag strategy for quantitative and high-throughput, proteome measurements. Proteomics 2002, 2, 513-523.
28. Conrads, T. P.; Anderson, G. A.; Veenstra, T. D.; Pasa-Tolic, L.; Smith, R. D. Utility of accurate mass tags for proteome-wide protein identification. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 3349-3354.
29. Pasa-Tolic, L.; Masselon, C.; Barry, R. C.; Shen, Y.; Smith, R. D. Proteomic analyses using an accurate mass and time tag strategy. BioTechniques 2004, 37, 621-633, 636.
30. Anderson, G. A.; Bruce, J. E.;Smith, R. D. ICR-2Ls, version 2.18; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory: Richland, WA, 1996.
31. Young H. D. Statistical Treatment of Experimental Data; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1962.
32. Engineering Statistics Handbook Homepage, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/ handbook/prc/section4/prc43.htm.