Knowledge expectations in mathematics teacher preparation programs in South Korea and the United States: Towards international dialogue

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 48-61

  Kim, Rae Young ^a   Ham, Seung Hwan ^b   Paine, Lynn W ^b  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

mathematics education; social expectations for teacher knowledge; sociohistorical contexts; teacher education development; transnational discourses on education

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551476550     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487110381999     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137-162). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
2. Akiba, M., LeTendre, G.K., & Scribner, J.P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369-387.
3. Alexander, R.J. (2000). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
4. Anderson-Levitt, K.M. (2002). Teaching cultures: Knowledge for teaching first grade in France and the United States. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
5. Annett, A. (2001). Social fractionalization, political instability, and the size of government. IMF Staff Papers, 48(3), 561-592.
6. Bae, C.-K. (1991). Education: Top reason behind rapid growth. Koreana, 5(2), 56-68.
7. Baker, D.P., & LeTendre, G.K. (2005). National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8. Ball, D.L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466.
9. Ball, D.L., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematics knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433-456). New York, NY: Macmillan.
10. Ball, D.L., Thames, M.H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
11. Banks, J.A. (2007). Educating citizens in a multicultural society (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
12. Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
13. Blömeke, S., & Paine, L.W. (2008). Getting the fish out of the water: Considering benefits and problems of doing research on teacher education at an international level. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2027-2037.
14. Blömeke, S., Paine, L.W., Houang, R., Hsieh, F.-J., Schmidt, W.H., Tatto, M.T.,et al.(2008). Future teachers' competence to plan a lesson: First results of a six-country study on the efficiency of teacher education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(5), 749-762.
15. Cha, Y.-K. (2002). Chodeung gyosa gyoyukgwajeong-ui jedo-jeok giwon mit segye-jeok hwaksan-e daehan bigyo yeongu [Institutional origins and the globalization of the primary teacher education program: A cross-national study]. Korean Journal of Comparative Education, 12(1), 113-128.
16. Cha, Y.-K., Dawson, W.P., & Ham, S.-H. (2010). Global civil society and the cross-national adoption of multicultural education policies. Paper presented at the XIV World Congress of the World Council of Comparative Education Societies, Istanbul, Turkey.
17. Clewell, B.C., & Forcier, L.B. (2001). Increasing the number of mathematics and science teachers: A review of teacher recruitment programs. Teaching and Change, 8(4), 331-361
18. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305.
19. Cummings, W.K. (2003). The institutions of education. Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.
20. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21. Desimone, L.M., Smith, T., Baker, D.P., & Ueno, K. (2005). Assessing barriers to the reform of U.S. mathematics instruction from an international perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 501-535.
22. Donoghue, E.F. (2006). The education of mathematics teachers in the United States: David Eugene Smith, early twentieth-century pioneer. Paedagogica Historica, 42(4), 559-573.
23. Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Schofer, E. (Eds.). (2003). Science in the modern world polity: Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Routledge.
25. Feistritzer, C.E. (2008). Introduction and overview. In C. E. Feistritzer (Ed.), Building a quality teaching force: Lessons learned from alternate routes (pp. 1-9). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
26. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Fraser, J.W. (2007). Preparing America's teachers: A history. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28. Goulding, M., Rowland, T., & Barber, P. (2002). Does it matter? Primary teacher trainees' subject knowledge in mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 28(5), 689-704.
29. Ham, S.-H., & Cha, Y.-K. (2009). Positioning education in the information society: The transnational diffusion of the information and communication technology curriculum. Comparative Education Review, 53(4), 535-557.
30. Ham, S.-H., Kim, R.Y., & Paine, L.W. (2008). Beyond the global/ national dichotomy: Mathematics teacher knowledge in South Korea and the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Comparative and International Education Society, New York, NY.
31. Hambleton, R.K. (2002). Adapting achievement tests into multiple languages for international assessments. In A. C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 58-79). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
32. Hess, F.M., & Petrilli, M.J. (2006). No Child Left Behind: Primer. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
33. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J.W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15.
34. Hill, H.C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D.L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
35. Ingersoll, R. M. (Ed.). (2007). A comparative study of teacher preparation and qualifications in six nations. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
36. Jang, U.-H. (2001). Gyosa gyoyuk program gyoyukgwajeong-ui munjegeom-gwa gaeseonbangahn [Problems in curricula for teacher education programs and suggestions for improvement]. Educational Research, 21(1), 65-79.
37. Jeynes, W. (2008). What we should and should not learn from the Japanese and other East Asian education systems. Educational Policy, 22(6), 854-874.
38. Jin, S., Kwak, D.-J., & Jo, D.-J. (2007). Hyeonjang jungsim gyosa-gyoyuk yeongu: Yeongguk Oxford daehakgyo-wa Canada Queens daehakgyo-ui sarye-reul jungsim-euro [A study on field-based teacher education programs: Reflective practices at Oxford University, U.K., and Queens University, Canada]. Korean Journal of Comparative Education, 17(3), 241-268.
39. Kang, N.-H., & Hong, M. (2008). Achieving excellence in teacher workforce and equity in learning opportunities in South Korea. Educational Researcher, 37(4), 200-207.
40. Kennedy, M.M., Ahn, S., & Choi, J. (2008). The value added by teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 1249-1273). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Kim, K.-J. (2007). Gyosa gyoyuk damron-e natanan gijun-gwanryeon jenggeom tamsaek [Exploring issues in the discourse of standards-based reforms in teacher education]. Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 24(3), 251-273.
42. Kim, R.Y., & Ham, S.-H. (2007). Cultural and institutional epistemology of mathematics teacher knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Seoul, South Korea.
43. Kim, Y.-K. (2002). Suhakgyosa yangseong-eul wihan gyoyuk-ui isang-kwa hyeonsil [Educational ideals and realities and mathematics teacher education]. Journal of Korean Society of Mathematics Education Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 14, 453-468.
44. Kwon, O.-N. (2004). Mathematics teacher education in Korea. Paper presented at the International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-10), Copenhagen, Denmark.
45. Labaree, D. (2008). An uneasy relationship: The history of teacher education in the university. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 290-306). Washington, DC: Association of Teacher Educators.
46. Lee, B.-H., Kim, J.-S., Ahn, J.-Y., Jung, J.H., Nam, K.G., Rhyu, J.S.,et al.(2005). Education and the labor market in Korea. Seoul, South Korea: Korea Labor Institute. Retrieved from http://kli.re.kr/.
47. LeTendre, G.K., Baker, D.P., Akiba, M., Goesling, B., & Wiseman, A.W. (2001). Teachers' work: Institutional isomorphism and cultural variation in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Educational Researcher, 30(6), 3-15.
48. Leung, F.K.S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35-51.
49. Lortie, D.C. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
51. McEwan, H., & Bull, B. (1991). The pedagogic nature of subject matter knowledge. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 316-334.
52. Meyer, J.W., & Ramirez, F.O. (2000). The world institutionalization of education. In J. Schriewer (Ed.), Discourse formation in comparative education (pp. 111-131). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
53. Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1983). The structure of educational organizations. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 71-97). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
54. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology. (2009). Kyowon yangseong hyunhwang [Statistics of teacher education programs]. Retrieved from http://www.mest.go.kr/.
55. Mitchell, K.J., Robinson, D.Z., Plake, B.S., & Knowles, K.T. (2001). Testing teacher candidates: The role of licensure tests in improving teacher quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
56. National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). State education reforms. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/statereform/tab3_1.asp.
57. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF). (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York, NY: Author.
58. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2008). Professional standards for the accreditation of teacher preparation institutions. Washington, DC: Author.
59. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing, and retaining effective teachers. Paris, France: Author.
60. Oser, F.K. (1994). Moral perspectives on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20(1), 57-127.
61. Paine, L. (1990). Teacher as virtuoso: A Chinese model for teaching. Teachers College Record, 92(1), 49-81.
62. Pang, J.S. (2003). Suhakgyosa hakseup-kwa jeonmunseong sinjang-e kwanhan sogo [Mathematics teacher learning and professional development]. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 13(2), 143-157.
63. Park, H.-S. (1998). Suhakgyosa-ui suhak [Mathematics for mathematics teachers]. Paper presented at the ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education 1, Cheongwon, South Korea.
64. Phillips, D. (2004). Toward a theory of policy attraction in education. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 54-67). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
65. Putnam, R.T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
66. Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 23-44). London, UK: Sage.
67. Robinson, J. (1994). Social status and academic success in South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 38(4), 506-530.
68. Roth, R.A. (1999). University as context for teacher development. In R. A. Roth (Ed.), The role of the university in the preparation of teachers (pp. 180-195). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer.
69. Ryan, G.W., & Bernard, H.R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 769-802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70. Schmidt, W.H., Tatto, M.T., Bankov, K., Blömeke, S., Cedillo, T., Cogan, L.,et al.(2007). The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries (MT21 Report). East Lansing, MI: Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University.
71. Schriewer, J. (2003). Globalization in education: Process and discourse. Policy Futures in Education, 1(2), 271-283.
72. Sedlak, M.W. (1989). Let us go and buy a schoolmaster. In D. Warren (Ed.), American teachers: Histories of a profession at work (pp. 257-290). New York, NY: Macmillan.
73. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education. (2009, October 19). 2010 haknyondo jungdeung-gyosa imyongsiheom jiwon hyeonhwang [Applications for the national teacher employment test for positions at public secondary schools: Statistics for the academic year 2010]. Retrieved from http://www.sen.go.kr.
74. Seth, M.J. (2002). Education fever: Society, politics, and the pursuit of schooling in South Korea. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
75. Shin, H.-S. (2009). Gyowon yangseong cheje-ui gaepyon banghyang-gwa jeonryak-ui tamsaek [Policy directions and strategies to reform preservice teacher education]. Journal of Korean Education, 36(3), 53-78.
76. Shin, H.Y., & Lee, J.W. (2004). Suhakgyosa-ui jisik-e kwanhan yeongu [A study on mathematics teacher knowledge]. Journal of Korean Society of Mathematics Education Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 18(1), 297-308.
77. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
78. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
79. Sorensen, C.W. (1994). Success and education in South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 38(1), 10-35.
80. Stigler, J.W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: Free Press.
81. Tatto, M.T. (2008). Teacher policy: A framework for comparative analysis. Prospects, 38(4), 487-508.
82. Tatto, M.T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M): Conceptual framework. East Lansing, MI: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.
83. U.S. Department of Education Office of Postsecondary Education. (2006). The secretary's fifth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
84. Wang, J., & Lin, E. (2005). Comparative studies on U.S. and Chinese mathematics learning and the implications for standards-based mathematics teaching reform. Educational Researcher, 34(5), 3-13.
85. Wayne, A.J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122.
86. Weick, K.E. (1976). Education organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 11-19.
87. Wilson, S.M., Floden, R.E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
88. Wise, A.E. (1999). Moving toward performance-based accreditation systems for the teaching profession. In R. A. Roth (Ed.), The role of the university in the preparation of teachers (pp. 151-165). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer.
89. Wiseman, A.W., & Baker, D.P. (2006). The symbiotic relationship between empirical comparative research on education and neo-institutional theory. In D. P. Baker & A. W. Wiseman (Eds.), The impact of comparative education research on institutional theory (pp. 1-26). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
90. Woo, Y.-J., & Ahn, H.-S. (2006). Geundae-jeok gyowon yangseong jedo-ui byeoncheon-gwa sabeomdaehak-ui seolrip [Teacher training system from the Hanseong Normal School to the college of education of Seoul National University]. Asian Journal of Education, 7(4), 187-215.
91. Zeichner, K.M., Grant, C., Gay, G., Gillette, M., Valli, L., & Villegas, A.M. (1998). A research informed vision of good practice in multicultural teacher education: Design principles. Theory Into Practice, 37(2), 163-171.