Future teachers' competence to plan a lesson: First results of a six-country study on the efficiency of teacher education

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 749-762

  Blömeke, Sigrid ^a   Paine, Lynn ^a   Houang, Richard T ^a   Hsieh, Feng Jui ^b   Schmidt, William H ^a   Tatto, M Teresa ^a   Bankov, Kiril ^c   Cedilllo, Tenoch ^a   Cogan, Leland ^d   Han, Shin Il ^e   Santillan, Marcella ^d   Schwille, John ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOFIA   (Bulgaria)

^d Instituto Nacional para la Evaluacion de la Educacion (INEE)   (Mexico)

^e Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450159575     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-008-0123-y     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aebli, H. (1983). Zwölf Grundformen des Lehrens. Eine Allgemeine Didaktik auf psychologischer Grundlage. Stuttgart: Klett.
2. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E. & Pintrich, P. R. (Hrsg.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
3. Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2002). Teaching culture as national and transnational: A response to Teachers' work. Educational Researcher, 31(3), 19-21.
4. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehardt & Winston. Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, Th J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van Der.
5. Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007). Evaluating Assessment Quality in Competence-Based Education. A Qualitative Comparison of Two Frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 114-129.
6. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
7. Berliner, D. C. (2004). Describing the Behavior and Documenting the Accomplishments of Expert Teachers. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 24(3), 200-212.
8. Birenbaum, M. (2003). New Insights into Learning and Teaching and their Implications for Assessment. In M. Seegers, F. J. R. C. Dochy & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimizing New Modes of Assessment. In Search of Qualities and Standards (pp. 13-36). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9. Bishop, A. J. (1991). Mathematical Enculturation. A Cultural Perspective on Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10. Blömeke, S. & Paine, L. (2008). Getting the fish out of the water: Considering benefits and problems of doing research on teacher education at an international level. Teaching and Teacher Education (in press).
11. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061-1071.
13. Broadfoot, P. (1996). Education, Assessment and Society. A Sociological Analysis. Buckingham: Open University Press.
14. Bromme, R. (1997). Kompetenzen, Funktionen und unterrichtliches Handeln des Lehrers. In F.E. Weinert (Hrsg.), Psychologie des Unterrichts und der Schule (S. 177-212). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
15. Brophy, J. E. (1999): Teaching. IBE (=Educational Practices Series; 1): Brussels.
16. Clarke, D. (2003). International Comparative Research in Mathematics Education. In Bishop, A. J., Clements, M. A., Keitel, Ch., Kilpatrick, J. & Leung, F. K. S. (Hrsg.). Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 143-184.
17. Cronbach, L. J., Linn, R. L., Brennan, R. L., & Haertel, E. H. (1997). Generalizability, analysis for Performance Assessments of Student Achievement or School Effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 373-399.
18. Cummings, W. K. (1999). The institutions of education: Compare, compare, compare!. Comparative Education Review, 43(4), 413-437.
19. Dahrendorf, R. (1965). Bildung ist Bürgerrecht. Plädoyer für eine aktive Bildungspolitik. Hamburg: Nannen.
20. Dierick, S., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (2001). New lines in edumetrics. new forms of assessment lead to new assessment criteria. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 307-329.
21. Dochy, F., Gijbels, D., & Segers, M. (2006). Learning and the Emerging New Assessment Culture. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional Psychology: Past, Present and Future Trends (pp. 191-206). Oxford: Elsevier.
22. Dupriez, V., Dumay, X., & Vause, A. (2008). How do school systems manage pupils' heterogeneity? Comparative Education Review, 52(2), 245-273.
23. Educational Testing Service (ETS). (2005). The Praxis Series.
24. Principles of Learning and Teaching: Grades 5-9 (0523). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
25. Eraut, M. (1994). Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. London: Routledge Falmer.
26. Fraser, B. J., Walberg, H. J., Welch, W. W., & Hattie, J. A. (1987). Syntheses of educational productivity research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 145-252.
27. Ham, S. H., Kim, R. Y. & Tanner, P. (2008). Taking Beliefs and Knowledge Seriously: The Problems of Language and Scaling in Alternative Methods for Comparative Research on Teacher Knowledge. Paper presented at CIES 2008 in New York.
28. Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Advances in Assessment Models, Methods and Practices. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 899-925). New York: Macmillan.
29. Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2006). Does Educational Tracking Affect Performance and Inequality? Differences-in-Differences Evidence across Countries. Economic Journal, 116(510), 63-73.
30. Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., & Lewis, J. M. (2007). Assessing Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge: What Knowledge Matters and What Evidence Counts? In F. Lester (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Mathematics Education (2nd edn) (pp. 111-155). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
31. Hopmann, St. & Riquarts, K. (1995): Didaktik and/or Curriculum. Basic problems of comparative didaktik. In Hopmann, St. & Riquarts, K. (Eds.): Didaktik and/or curriculum. Kiel: IPN 1995, pp. 9-40.
32. Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144.
33. König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2007). Proposal to Conceptualize the General Pedagogy Knowledge in TEDS-M. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität.
34. König, J. & Blömeke, S. (2008). Fachübergreifendes Wissen von angehenden Lehrkräften: Wie kann es getestet werden und welche Struktur hat es? (submitted).
35. Kozol, J. (2006). The Shame of the Nation. The Restoration of apartheid in Schooling in America. New York: Random House.
36. Krauss, St., Kunter, M., Brunner, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M. et al. (2004). COACTIV. Professionswissen von Lehrkräften, kognitiv aktivierender Mathematikunterricht und die Entwicklung von mathematischer Kompetenz. In J. Doll & M. Prenzel (Hrsg.), Bildungsqualität von Schule. Lehrerprofessionalisierung, Unterrichtsentwicklung und Schülerförderung als Strategien der Qualitätsverbesserung (S. 31-53). Waxmann:Münster.
37. Krennerich, M. (2003). Demokratie in Lateinamerika. Eine Bestandsaufnahme nach der Wiedergeburt vor 25 Jahren. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (B38-39).
38. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.
39. Lancaster, R. (2005). Text, subtext, and context: Strategies for reading alliance theory. American Ethnologist, 32(1), 22-27.
40. LeTendre, G. K., Hofer, B. K., & Shimizu, H. (2003). What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the United States, Germany and Japan. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 43-89.
41. McDonald, J. P. (1992). Teaching: Making sense of an uncertain craft. New York: Teachers College Press.
42. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
43. Messick, S. (1996). Validity of Performance Assessments. In G. Philips (Ed.), Technical Issues in Large-Scale Performance Assessment (pp. 1-18). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
44. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Smith, T. A., Garden, R. A., Gregory, K. D., Gonzalez, E. J., et al. (2003). TIMSS Assessment Frameworks and Specifications 2003 (2nd edn). Boston College: Chestnut Hill.
45. PACT Consortium (2005). Performance Assessment for California Teachers (Ms.). Letzter Zugriff 17.11.2008, unter http://www. pacttpa.org/.
46. Picht, G. (1964). Die deutsche Bildungskatastrophe. Analyse und Dokumentation. Olten: Walter.
47. Postlethwaite, N. T. (1967). School Organization and Student Achievement. A Study Based on Achievement in Mathematics in Twelve Countries. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
48. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15.
49. Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (1991). Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensionality, and immediacy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 63-88.
50. Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The Foundations of Educational Effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon.
51. Riedel, S. (2005). Die Erfindung der Balkanvölker. Identitätspolitik zwischen Konflikt und Integration. Wiesbaden: VS.
52. Schmidt, W.H., Tatto, M.T., Bankov, K., Blömeke, S., Cedillo, T., Cogan, L., Han, S. I., Houang, R., Hsieh, F. J., Paine, L., Santillan, M.N. & Schwille, J. (2007). The Preparation Gap: Teacher Education for Middle School Mathematics in Six Countries-Mathematics Teaching in the 21st Century (MT21). East Lansing, MI: MSU [letzter Zugriff 12.12.2007, unter http://usteds.msu.edu/related_research.asp].
53. Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world (G. Walsh& F. Lehnert, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
54. Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454-499.
55. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Havard Educational Research, 57, 1-22.
56. Slavin, R. E. (1994). Quality, appropiateness, incentive, and time: A model of instructional effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Research, 21, S141-S157.
57. Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at Work. Models for Superior Performance. New York: Wiley.
58. Stark, R., & Mandl, H. (2000). Das Theorie-Praxis-Problem in der pädagogisch-psychologischen Forschung-ein unüberwindbares Transferproblem? (Forschungsbericht Nr. 118). München: LMU, Lehrstuhl für Empirische Pädagogik und Pädagogische Psychologie.
59. Taconis, R., Van der Plas, P., & Van der Sanden, J. (2004). The development of professional competencies by educational assistants in school-based teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 215-240.
60. Tulodziecki, G., Herzig, B., & Blömeke, S. (2004). Gestaltung von Unterricht. Eine Einführung in die Didaktik. Bad Heilbrunn Braunschweig: Klinkhardt Westermann.
61. Weinert, F.E. (2001). Concept of Competence: A Conceptual Clarification. In D.S. Rychen & L.H. Salganik (Hrsg.), Defining and Selecting Key Competencies (S. 45-66). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
62. Westbury, I. D. (1995): Didaktik and curriculum theory. Are they the two sides of the same coin? In Hopmann, St. Riquarts, K. (eds.): Didactik and/or curriculum. Kiel: IPN 1995, pp. 233-263.
63. Wiggan, G. (2007). Race, school achievement, and educational inequality: Toward a student-based inquiry perspectives. Review of Educational Research, 77, 310-333.