Peer coaching to improve classroom differentiation: Perspectives from project CLUE

Roeper Review

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 27-39

  Latz, Amanda O ^a   Speirs Neumeister, Kristie L ^a   Adams, Cheryll M ^a   Pierce, Rebecca L ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551469638     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190802527356     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams, C. M., & Pierce, R. L. (2004). Project CLUE mentor log. Unpublished instrument, Ball State University, Muncie, IN.
2. Baum, S. M., Cooper, C. R., & Neu, T. W. (2001). Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 477-490.
3. Betts, G. (2004). Fostering autonomous learners through levels of differentiation. Roeper Review, 26, 190-191.
4. Bowman, C. L., & McCormick, S. (2001). Comparison of peer coaching versus traditional supervision effects. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 256-262.
5. Brandt, R. S. (1987). On teachers coaching teachers: A conversation with Bruce Joyce. Educational Leadership, 44(5), 12-17.
6. Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing justice. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complimentary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Cooper, C. (1998). For the good of humankind: Matching the budding talent with a curriculum of conscience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 238-244.
9. Gately, S. E., & Gately, F. J., Jr. (2001). Understanding co-teaching components. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(4), 40-47.
10. Gingiss, P. L. (1993). Peer coaching: Building collegial support for using innovative health programs. Journal of School Health, 63(2), 79-85.
11. Hertberg-Davis, H. L., & Brighton, C. M. (2006). Support and sabotage: Principal’s influence on middle school teachers’ responses to differentiation. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 90-102.
12. Kallick, B., & Costa, A. L. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49-51.
13. Kane, J., & Henning, J. E. (2004). A case study of the collaboration in mathematics between a fourth-grade teacher and a talented and gifted coordinator. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27, 243-266.
14. Keefe, E. B., Moore, V., & Duff, F. (2004). The four “knows” of collaborative teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(5), 36-42.
15. Knopper, D., & Fertig, C. (2005). Differentiation for gifted children: It’s all about trust. The Illinois Association for Gifted Children Journal, 6(1), 6-8.
16. Landrum, M. S. (2001). An evaluation of the catalyst program: Consultation and collaboration in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 139-151.
17. Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2005a). A dynamic scaffolding model of teacher development: The gifted education consultant as catalyst for change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 222-230.
18. Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2005b). Being smart about gifted children: A guidebook for parents and educators. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
19. Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2006). Mystery to mastery: Shifting paradigms in gifted education. Roeper Review, 28, 64-69.
20. McGrail, L. (2005). Modifying regular classroom curricula for high-ability students. In S. Johnsen & J. Kendrick (Eds.), Teaching strategies in gifted education (pp. 17-24). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
21. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Page, S. W. (2000). When changes for the gifted spur differentiation for all. Educational Leadership, 58(1), 62-65.
23. Pierce, R. L., Adams, C. M., Speirs Neumeister, K. L., Cassady, J. C., Dixon, F. A., & Cross, T. L. (2007). Development of an identification procedure for a large urban school corporation: Identifying culturally diverse and academically gifted elementary students. Roeper Review, 29, 113-118.
24. Raywid, M. A. (1993). Finding time for collaboration. Educational Leadership, 51(1), 30-34.
25. Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12-16.
26. Slater, C. L., & Simmons, D. L. (2001). The design and implementation of a peer coaching program. American Secondary Education, 29(3), 67-76.
27. Sparks, G. M., & Bruder, S. (1987). Before and after peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 54-57.
28. Swafford, J. (1998). Teachers supporting teachers through peer coaching. Support for Learning, 13(2), 54-58.
29. Thomas, D. R. (2003). A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved May 22, 2007, from http://www.health.auckland.ac.nz/hrmas/resources/Inductive2003.pdf
30. Tieso, C. (2004). Through the looking glass: One school’s reflections on differentiation. Gifted Child Today, 27(4), 58-65.
31. VanTassel-Baska, J. (2006). A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs: A clarion call for enhanced gifted program development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 199-210.
32. VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory into Practice, 44, 211-217.
33. Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. J. (1993). The classroom practices observation study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 120-146.