Mystery to mastery: Shifting paradigms in gifted education

Roeper Review

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 64-69

  Matthews, Dona J ^a   Foster, Joanne F ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007846487     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190609554340     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted. New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Borland, J. H. (2003). Rethinking gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Boyd, A., McDougall, D., & Yewchuk, C. (1998). Educational psychology for Canadian teachers (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON, Canada: Harcourt Brace.
4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students. Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
6. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
7. Feldhusen, J. F. (2003). Beyond general giftedness: New ways to identify and educate gifted, talented, and precocious youth. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 34-45). New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Feldman, D. H. (2003). A developmental, evolutionary perspective on giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 9-33). New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Ford, D. Y. (2003). Two other wrongs don't make a right: Sacrificing the needs of diverse students does not solve gifted education's unresolved problems. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 283-291.
10. Foster, J. (2000). A case study approach to understanding the gifted experience: Children's and parents' perceptions of labeling and placement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
11. Fox, S. (2003). The art of translation. In S. Fox, I. Scheffler, & D. Marom (Eds.), Visions of Jewish education (pp. 253). London: Cambridge University Press.
12. Gagné, F. (1999). Is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 191-234.
13. Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 60-74). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14. Gagné, F. (2005). An imperative, but, alas, improbable consensus! Roeper Review, 27, 12-14.
15. Gallagher, J. J. (2003). Issues and challenges in the education of gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 11-23). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
17. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic.
18. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Henderson, V. & Dweck, C. S. (1990). Adolescence and achievement. In S. Feldman & G. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: Adolescent development (pp. 308-329). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Heward, W. L. (2002). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Howe, M. J. A. (1990). The origins of exceptional abilities. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
22. Keating, D. P. (1991). Curriculum options for the developmentally advanced. Exceptionality Education Canada, 1(1), 53-83.
23. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. Vol. 1. Report of the Congress of the United States by the US Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
25. Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2005). A dynamic scaffolding model of teacher development: The gifted education consultant as catalyst for change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 222-230.
26. Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2005). Being smart about gifted children: A guidebook for parents and educators. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
27. Matthews, D. J., & Steinhauer, N. (1998). Giftedness, girls, others, and equity: Theorybased practical strategies for the regular classroom. Exceptionality Education Canada, 8(2), 41-56.
28. Nelson, C. A. (1999). Neural plasticity and human development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 42-45.
29. Nelson, C. A. (in press). Neural development and life-long plasticity. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), The nature and nurture of early child development: Beyond myth to science, policy, and practice. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
30. Renzulli, J. S. (1976). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20, 303-326.
31. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Steinberg and J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2003). The schoolwide enrichment model: Developing creative and productive giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 184-203). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33. Robinson, N. M. (2003). Two wrongs do not make a right: Sacrificing the needs of gifted students does not solve society's unsolved problems. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 251-273.
34. Robinson, N. M., & Robinson, H. B. (1982). The optimal match: Devising the best compromise for the highly gifted student. In D. Feldman (Ed.), New directions for child development: Developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity (pp. 79-94). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Rogers, K. B. (2002). Re-forming gifted education: How parents and teachers can match the program to the child. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
36. Rogers, K. B. (2003). A voice of reason in the wilderness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 314-320.
37. Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38. Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1983). Educating mathematically precocious youths: Twelve policy recommendations. Educational Researcher, 11(5), 4-9.
39. Stanley, J. C., Keating, D. P., & Fox, L. (1974). Mathematical talent. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
40. Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Arnold, K. D. (2003). Beyond bloom: Revisiting environmental factors that enhance or impede talent development. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 227-238). New York: Teachers College Press.
41. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
42. Treffinger, D. J., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1996). Talent recognition and development: Successor to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 181-193.
43. Trotter, M. L., Stevens, D., Hawes, R., & Matthews, D. J. (1999, June). Delivering high level learning to all of our students: A panel discussion with a focus on best practices. Paper presented at the Canadian Symposium for the Study of Education, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
44. VanTassel-Baska, J., & Little, C. A. (Eds.) (2003). Content-based curriculum for highability learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
45. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1930)