Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 477-490

  Baum, Susan M ^a   Cooper, Carolyn R ^b   Neu, Terry W ^c  

^a The College of New Rochelle   (United States)

^b Maryland State Health Department   (United States)

^c SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035457363     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.1036     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adelman, H.S., & Taylor, L. (1986). An introduction to learning disabilities. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Co.
2. Baldwin, L.J., & Gargiulo, D.A. (1983). A model program for elementary-age learning-disabled/gifted youngsters. In L.H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin (Eds.), Learning-disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming (pp. 207-221). Baltimore: University Park Press.
3. Barton, J., & Starnes, W. (1988). Identifying distinguishing characteristics of gifted and talented/learning disabled students. Roeper Review, 12, 23-29.
4. Baum, S. (1988). An enrichment program for gifted learning disabled students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 226-230.
5. Baum, S. (1997). Project HIGH HOPES: Final evaluation report. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (Grant # R206R00001).
6. Baum, S., & Owen, S.V. (1988). High ability/learning disabled students: How are they different? Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 321-326.
7. Baum, S., Owen, S.V., & Dixon, J. (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled: From definitions to practical intervention strategies. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
8. Baum, S., Renzulli, J.S., & Hébert, T. (1995). The prism metaphor: A new paradigm for reversing underachievement (CRS 95310). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
9. Baum, S., Neu, T.W., & Cooper, C.R. (1997, November). One size does not fit all: Implementing a dually differentiated curriculum for bright middle-schoolers with disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children, Little Rock, AR.
10. Coble, C.R. (1988). Science for learning disabled students (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 258803).
11. Colangelo, N. (1997). Counseling gifted students: Issues and practices. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 353-365). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Cooper, C.R. (Producer), Neu, T.W., & Baum, S. (1996). Dual differentiation: A comprehensive problem-based curriculum [Video]. (Available from Project HIGH HOPES, 205 Skiff Street, Hamden, CT 06517).
13. Cooper, C.R. (1998). For the good of humankind: Matching the budding talent with a curriculum of conscience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12, 238-244.
14. Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research policy and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25, 5-13.
15. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Public Law No. 94-142, Stat. 773 (1977).
16. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
17. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligence: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
18. Gardner, H. (1995). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
19. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligences reframed: Multiple intelligences for the twenty-first century. New York: Basic Books.
20. Gentry, M., & Neu, T.W. (1998). Project High Hopes Summer Institute: Curriculum for developing talent in students with special needs. Roeper Review, 20, 291-295.
21. Gregorc, A.F. (1982). An adult's guide to style. Columbia, CT: Gregorc Associates, Inc.
22. Hollingworth, L.S. (1926). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan.
23. Maslow, A.H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrum.
24. Mercer, C.D., King-Sears, P., & Mercer, A.R. (1990). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 13, 141-152.
25. National Association for Gifted Children. (1998). Students with concomitant gifts and learning disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
26. Neu, T.W. (1996, April). The dually-differentiated curriculum: Key to meeting the educational needs of gifted learning disabled students. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Gifted Underachieving Students, Denver, CO.
27. Olenchak, F.R. (1994). Talent development: Accommodating the social and emotional needs of secondary gifted learning disabled students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5, 40-52.
28. Parnes, S., Noller, R., & Biondi, A. (1977). Guide to creative action. New York: Scribner's.
29. Piers, E.V. (1984). The Piers-Harris children's self-concept scale (revised) manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
30. Reis, S.M., & Neu, T.W. (1994). Factors involved in the academic success of high ability university students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5, 60-74.
31. Reis, S.M., Neu, T.W., & McGuire, J. (1995). Talent in two places: Case studies of high-ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved (Research Monograph No. 95114). Storrs, CT: The University of Connecticut.
32. Renzulli, J.S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
33. Renzulli, J.S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184, 261.
34. Renzulli, J.S. (1982). What makes a problem real? Stalking the illusive meaning of qualitative differences in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 147-156.
35. Rosner, S. (1985). Special-twice: Guidelines for developing programs for gifted children with learning disabilities. Gifted Child Today, 38, 55-58.
36. Sah, A., & Borland, J.H. (1989). The effects of a structured home plan on home and school behaviors of gifted learning disabled students with deficits in organizational skills. Roeper Review, 12, 54-57.
37. Schiff, M., Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (1981). Scatter analysis of WISC-R profiles for learning disabled children with superior intelligence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 400-404.
38. Schultz, J.B., Carpenter, C.D., & Turnbull, A.P. (1991). Mainstreaming exceptional students: A guide for classroom teachers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
39. Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1989). Mnemonic instruction of LD students: A field-based evaluation. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 12, 199-225.
40. Silverman, L.K. (1989). Invisible gifts, invisible handicaps. Roeper Review, 12, 37-42.
41. Tannenbaum, A.J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
42. Tannenbaum, A., & Baldwin, L.J. (1983). Giftedness and learning disabilities: A paradoxical combination. In L. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin (Eds.), Learning disabled/gifted children (pp. 11-36). Baltimore: University Park Press.
43. Taylor, H.G. (1989). Learning disabilities. In J. Nash & R.A. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders (pp. 347-380). New York: Guilford Press.
44. U.S. Department of Education. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
45. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1992). Planning effective curriculum for gifted learners. Denver, CO: Love Publications.
46. Webb, J.T., Meckstroth, E.A., & Tolan, S.S. (1982). Guiding the gifted child. Columbus, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
47. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-revised (WISC-R). New York: The Psychological Corporation.
48. Whitmore, J.R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
49. Whitmore, J.R., & Maker, C.J. (1985). Intellectual giftedness in disabled persons. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
50. Ysseldyke, J.E., & Algozzine, B. (1982). Critical issues in special and remedial education. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
51. Yewchuck, C.R. (1986). Issues in identification of gifted learning disabled children. British Columbia: Journal of Special Education, 10, 201-209.