A case study of the collaboration in mathematics between a fourth-grade teacher and a talented and gifted coordinator

Journal for the Education of the Gifted

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 243-266

  Kane, Janine ^a   Henning, John E ^b  

^a Keystone Area Education Association   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13544262616     PISSN: 01623532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4219/jeg-2004-318     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Chalfant, J. C., & Van Dusen Pysh, M. (1993). Teacher assistance teams: Implications for the gifted. In C. J. Maker (Ed.), Critical issues in gifted education: Vol. 3. Programs for the gifted in regular classrooms (pp. 32-48). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
2. Dettmer, P., & Landrum, M. (1998). Staff development: The key to effective gifted education programs. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
3. Gallagher, J. J., & Gallagher, S. A. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Gallagher, J. J., Harradine, C. C., & Coleman, M. R. (1997). Challenge or boredom? Gifted students' views on their schooling. Roeper Review, 19, 132-136.
5. Gehrke, N. J., Knapp, M. S., & Sirotnik, K. A. (1992). In search of the school curriculum. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education: Vol. 18 (pp. 51-110). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
6. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
7. Goodlad, J. I. (1983). Individuality, commonality, and curricular practice. In G. D. Fenstermacher & J. I. Goodlad (Eds.), Eighty-second yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Part I. Individual differences and the common curriculum (pp. 300-318). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Kirschenbaum, R. J., Armstrong, D. C., & Landrum, M. S. (1999). Resource consultation model in gifted education to support talent development in today's inclusive schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 39-47.
9. Landrum, M. S. (2001a). An evaluation of the Catalyst Program: Consultation and collaboration in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 139-151.
10. Landrum, M. S. (2001b). Resource consultation and collaboration in gifted education. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 457-466.
11. Landrum, M. S. (2002). Consultation in gifted education: Teachers working together to serve students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
12. National Association for Gifted Children. (1994, June). Differentiation of curriculum and instruction. Washington, DC: Author.
13. Piirto, J. (1998). Talented children and adults: Their development and education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
15. Smutny, J. F., & Blocksom, R. H. (1990). Education of the gifted: Programs and perspectives. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
16. Tomlinson, C. A. (1995). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
18. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1998). Excellence in educating gifted & talented learners (3rd ed.). Denver, CO: Love.
19. Westberg, K. L., & Archambault, F. X., Jr. (1997). A multi-site case study of successful classroom practices for high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 42-51.
20. Winebrenner, S. (2000). Gifted students need an education, too. Educational Leadership, 58, 52-56.
21. Zaccaro, E. (2000). Challenge math for the elementary and middle school student. Bellevue, IA: Hickory Grove Press.