Development of an identification procedure for a large urban school corporation: Identifying culturally diverse and academically gifted elementary students

Roeper Review

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 113-118

  Pierce, Rebecca L ^a   Adams, Cheryll M ^a   Speirs Neumeister, Kristie L ^a   Cassady, Jerrell C ^a   Dixon, Felicia A ^a   Cross, Tracy L ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007887122     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190709554394     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adams, C. M., Cross, T. L., Dixon, F. D., & Rice, R. (1998). Project GATE: Gifted and Talented Enhancement. Proposal for Jacob K. Javits Grant. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from U.S. Department of Education Web site: http://www.ed.gov/programs/javits/9600abstracts.doc
2. Adams, C. M., & Pierce, R. L. (2002). The Adams/Pierce Checklist. An instrument developed for Project CLUE. Muncie, IN: Ball State University.
3. Bernal, E. M. (1994, April). Finding and cultivating minority gifted/talented students. Paper presented at the National Conference on Alternative Teacher Certification, Washington, DC.
4. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2003). Qualitative research for education (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Borland, J. M., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164-171.
6. Bracken, B. (2006, March). An approach for identifying underrepresented populations for G/T programs: The UNIT test. Presentation at the 64th Annual College of William and Mary Psychology Conference, Williamsburg, VA.
7. Briggs, C. J., & Reis, S. M. (2004). An introduction to the topic of cultural diversity and giftedness. In C. Tomlinson, D. Ford, S. Reis, C. Briggs, & C. Strickland (Eds.), In search of the dream: Designing schools and classrooms that work for high potential students from diverse cultural backgrounds (pp. 5-32). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
8. Callahan, C. M., Hunsaker, S., Adams, C. M., Moore, S. D., & Bland, L. (1995). Instruments used in the identification of gifted and talented students. Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
9. Campbell, J. R., & Verna, M. A. (1998, April). Messages from the field: American teachers of the gifted talk back to the research community. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
10. Cashion, M., & Sullenger, K. (1996, April). What it means to be gifted: Changing beliefs, changing practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, New York.
11. Cornell, G. D., Delcourt, M. A. B., Goldberg, M. D., & Bland, L. C. (1995). Achievement and self concept of minority students in elementary school gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 189-209.
12. Daniels, V. I. (1998). Minority students in gifted and special education programs: The case for educational equity. Journal of Special Education, 32, 41-44.
13. Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Ford, D. Y. (1994). The recruitment and retention of African American students in gifted education: Implications and recommendations. Charlottesville, VA: The Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Virginia.
15. Ford, D. Y. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students: Promising practices and programs. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Ford, D. Y. (1998). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. Journal of Special Education, 32, 4-14.
17. Ford, D. Y., & Harmon, D. A. (2001). Equity and excellence: Providing access to gifted education for culturally diverse students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 141-148.
18. Ford, D. Y., & Harris, J. J., III. (1994). Multicultural gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Ford, D. Y., & Harris, J. J., III. (1999). Promoting achievement among gifted Black students: The efficacy of new definitions and identification practices. Urban Education, 29, 202-229.
20. Frasier, M. M. (1997). Gifted minority students: Reframing approaches to their identification and education. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 498-515). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
21. Frasier, M. M., Garcia, J. H., & Passow, A. H. (1995). A review of assessment issues in gifted education and their implications for identifying gifted minority students. Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
22. Frasier, M. M., Hunsaker, S. L., Lee, J., Mitchell, S., Cramond, B., Krisel, S., et al. (1995). Core attributes of giftedness: A foundation for recognizing the gifted potential of economically disadvantaged students. Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
23. Gallagher, J. J. (2002). Society's role in educating gifted students: The role of public policy (RMO2162). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
24. Harris, J. J., III, & Ford, D. Y. (1991). Identifying and nurturing the promise of gifted black American children. Journal of Negro Education, 60, 3-18.
25. Hiatt, E., & Covington, J. (1991a, Fall). An update on the Javits Project: Identifying and serving disadvantaged gifted youth. Update on Gifted Education, 1, 21-26.
26. Hiatt, E., & Covington, J. (1991b, April). Identifying and serving diverse populations: Questions and answers. Update on Gifted Education, 1, 27-30.
27. Indiana Department of Education. (2003, November). Identifying students with high abilities in Indiana [Flipchart]. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
28. Indiana Public Law 221. (1999). Accountability under Public Law 221-1999. Retrieved October 29, 2006, from Indiana Department of Education Web site: http://www.doe.state.in.us/p1221/welcome.html
29. Lewis, J. D. (2000, March). Language isn't needed: Nonverbal assessments and gifted learners. Paper presented at Growing Partnerships for Rural Special Education, San Diego, CA.
30. Lohman, D.F. (2005a). Review of the Naglieri and Ford (2003): Does the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test identify equal proportions of high scoring White, Black, and Hispanic students? Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 19-28.
31. Lohman, D. F. (2005b). The role of nonverbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted students: An aptitude perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 111-138.
32. Maker, C. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes, and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 41-50.
33. Monsaas, J. A. (2001). Review of the TerraNova. In B. S. Plake & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The 14th mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1223-1226). Lincoln: The University of Nebraska, The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
34. Mills, C, & Tissor, S. (1995). Identifying academic potential in students from underrepresented populations: Is using the Ravens Progressive Matrices a good idea? Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 209-217.
35. Morris, J. E. (2002). African American students and gifted education. Roeper Review, 24, 59-63.
36. Naglieri, J. A. (1998, August). Testing diverse populations with the Naglieri Ability Tests. In J. A. Naglieri (Chair), Testing diverse populations with new nonverbal intelligence tests. Symposium conducted at the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
37. Naglieri, J. A., & Ford, D. Y. (2003). Addressing underrepresentation of gifted minority children using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT). Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 155-160.
38. Naglieri, J. A., & Ford, D. Y. (2005). Increasing minority children's participation in gifted classes using the NNAT: A response to Lohman. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 29-36.
39. Nitko, A. J. (2001). Review of the TerraNova. In B. S. Plake & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The 14th mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1226-1229). Lincoln: The University of Nebraska, The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
40. Passow, A. H., & Frasier, M. M. (1996). Toward improving identification of talent potential among minority and disadvantaged students. Roeper Review, 18, 198-211.
41. Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Coloured progressive matrices. Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologist Press.
42. Reid, C., Udall, A., Romanoff, B., & Algozzine, B. (1999). Comparison of traditional and problem-solving assessment criteria. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 252-264.
43. Sarouphim, K. M. (2002). DISCOVER in high school: Identifying gifted Hispanic and Native American students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 30-33.
44. Struck, J. (2003, April). A study of talent development in a predominantly low socioeconomic and/or African American population. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
45. Winfield, L. F. (1986). Teacher beliefs toward academically at risk students in inner urban schools. The Urban Review, 18, 253-268.