Effects of multiple competitors for pollination on bumblebee foraging patterns and Mimulus ringens reproductive success

Oikos

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 200-207

  Flanagan, Rebecca J ^a   Mitchell, Randall J ^a,b   Karron, Jeffrey D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEE; DICOTYLEDON; PLANT COMMUNITY; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLEN LIMITATION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS;

LOBELIA; LOBELIA SIPHILITICA; LYTHRACEAE; LYTHRUM SALICARIA; MIMULUS RINGENS;

EID: 78751622163     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18777.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aizen M. A. et al. 2008. Invasive mutualists erode native pollination webs. PLOS Biol. 6: 396-403.
2. Aldridge G. and Campbell D. R. 2007. Variation in pollinator preference between two Ipomopsis contact sites that differ in hybridization rate. Evolution 61: 99-110.
3. Bartomeus I. et al. 2008. Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant-pollinator networks. Oecologia 155: 761-770.
4. Bell J. M. et al. 2005. Interspecific competition for pollination lowers seed production and outcrossing rate in Mimulus ringens. Ecology 86: 762-771.
5. Bjerknes A. L. et al. 2007. Do alien plant invasions really affect pollination success in native plant species? Biol. Conserv. 138: 1-12.
6. Brown B. J. and Mitchell R. J. 2001. Competition for pollination: effects of pollen of an invasive plant on seed set of a native congener. Oecologia 129: 43-49.
7. Brown B. J. et al. 2002. Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 83: 2328-2336.
8. Campbell D. R. 1985. Pollinator sharing and seed set of Stellaria pubera: competition for pollination. Ecology 66: 544-563.
9. Caruso C. M. 2000. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 54: 1546-1557.
10. Caruso C. M. 2004. The quantitative genetics of floral trait variation in Lobelia: potential constraints on adaptive evolution. Evolution 58: 732-740.
11. Chittka L. and Schurkens S. 2001. Successful invasion of a floral market. Nature 411: 653.
12. Chittka L. et al. 1999. Flower constancy, insect psychology and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86: 361-377.
13. Dormann C. F. and Roxburgh S. H. 2005. Experimental evidence rejects pairwise modelling approach to coexistence in plant communities. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272: 1279-1285.
14. Farnsworth E. J. and Ellis D. R. 2001. Is purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) an invasive threat to freshwater wetlands? Conflicting evidence. Wetlands 21: 199-209.
15. Feinsinger P. 1978. Ecological interactions between plants and hummingbirds in a successional tropical community. Ecol. Monogr. 48: 269-287.
16. Feldman T. S. et al. 2004. When can two plants facilitate each other's pollination? Oikos 105: 197-207.
17. Flanagan R. J. et al. 2009. Interspecific pollinator movements reduce pollen deposition and seed production in Mimulus ringens (Phrymaceae). Am. J. Bot. 96: 809-815.
18. Flanagan R. J. et al. 2010. Increased relative abundance of an invasive competitor for pollination, Lythrum salicaria, reduces seed number in Mimulus ringens Oecologia doi 10.1007/s00442-010-1693-2
19. Gegear R. and Thomson J. D. 2004. Does the flower constancy of bumble bees reflect foraging economics? Ethology 110: 793-805.
20. Gegear R. and Laverty T. M. 2005. Flower constancy in bumblebees: a test of the trait variability hypothesis. Anim. Behav. 69: 939-949.
21. Ghazoul J. 2006. Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. J. Ecol. 94: 295-304.
22. Hager H. and McCoy K. D. 1998. The implications of accepting untested hypotheses: A review of the effects of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America. Biodiv. Conserv. 7: 1069-1079.
23. Husband B. C. and Barrett S. C. H. 1992. Pollinator visitation in populations of tristylous Eichhornia paniculata in northeastern Brazil. Oecologia 89: 365-371.
24. Jacobs J. 1974. Quantitative measurement of food selection. Oecologia 14: 413-417.
25. Johnson S. D. et al. 2003. Pollination success in a deceptive orchid is enhanced by co-occurring rewarding magnet plants. Ecology 84: 2919-2927.
26. Kandori I. et al. 2009. An invasive dandelion unilaterally reduces the reproduction of a native congener through competition for pollination. Oecologia 159: 559-569.
27. Karron J. D. et al. 1995a. The influence of population density on outcrossing rates in Mimulus ringens. Heredity 75: 175-180.
28. Karron J. D. et al. 1995b. Comparison of pollinator flight movements and gene dispersal patterns in Mimulus ringens. Heredity 75: 612-617.
29. Karron J. D. et al. 2004. The influence of floral display size on selfing rates in Mimulus ringens. Heredity 92: 242-248.
30. Karron J. D. et al. 2006. Multiple pollinator visits to Mimulus ringens (Phrymaceae) flowers increase mate number and seed set within fruits. Am. J. Bot. 93: 1306-1312.
31. Karron J. D. et al. 2009. Pollinator visitation patterns strongly influence among-flower variation in selfing rate. Ann. Bot. 103: 1379-1383.
32. Larson D. L. et al. 2006. Insect visitation and pollen deposition in an invaded prairie plant community. Biol. Conserv. 130: 148-159.
33. Lazaro A. et al. 2009. Co-flowering neighbors influence the diversity and identity of pollinator groups visiting plant species. Oikos 118: 691-702.
34. Levin D. A. and Anderson W. W. 1970. Competition for pollinators between simultaneously flowering species. Am. Nat. 104: 455-467.
35. Lopezaraiza-Mikel M. E. et al. 2007. The impact of an alien plant on a native plantpollinator network: an experimental approach. Ecol. Lett. 10: 539-550.
36. Mal T. K. and Hermann B. P. 2000. Quantitative evaluation of pollen polymorphism in a tristylous weed, Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae). Can. J. Bot. 78: 1086-1094.
37. Miller T. E. 1994. Direct and indirect species interactions on an early old-field plant community Am. Nat. 143: 1007-1025.
38. Mitchell R. J. et al. 2004. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Funct. Ecol. 18: 116-124.
39. Mitchell R. J. et al. 2005. Patterns of multiple paternity in fruits of Mimulus ringens (Phrymaceae). Am. J. Bot. 92: 885-890.
40. Mitchell R. J. et al. 2009. New frontiers in competition for pollination. Ann. Bot. 103: 1403-1413.
41. Montgomery B. R. 2009. Effect of introduced Euphorbia esula on the pollination of Viola pedatifida. Botany 87: 283-292.
42. Morales C. L. and Aizen M. A. 2006. Invasive mutualisms and the structure of plant-pollinator interactions in the temperate forests of northwest Patagonia, Argentina. J. Ecol. 94: 171-180.
43. Morales C. L. and Traveset A. 2009. A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants. Ecol. Lett. 12: 716-728.
44. Mosquin T. 1971. Competition for pollinators as a stimulus for the evolution of flowering time. Oikos 22: 398-402.
45. Murcia C. and Feinsinger P. 1996. Interspecific pollen loss by hummingbirds visiting flower mixtures: effects of floral architecture. Ecology 77: 550-560.
46. Perkins T. A. et al. 2007. Multi-species interactions in competitive hierarchies: new methods and empirical test. J. Veg. Sci. 18: 685-692.
47. Rathcke B. 1983. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. - In: Real L. (ed), Pollination biology. Academic Press, pp. 305-309.
48. Rathcke B. 1988. Interactions for pollination among coflowering shrubs. Ecology 69: 446-457.
49. Sokal R. R. and Rohlf F. J. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research (3rd ed.). - W.H. Freeman.
50. Snaydon R. W. 1991. Replacement or additive designs for competition studies? J. Appl. Ecol. 28: 930-946.
51. Takakura K. et al. 2009. Alien dandelion reduces the seedset of a native congener through frequency-dependent and one-sided effects. Biol. Invas. 11: 973-981.
52. Thomson J. D. and Chittka L. 2001. Pollinator individuality: when does it matter? - In: Chittka L. and Thomson J. D. (eds), Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behavior and floral evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 191-213.
53. Vamosi J. C. et al. 2005. Pollination decays in biodiversity hotspots. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103: 956-961.
54. Waser N. M. 1978. Competition for pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59: 934-944.
55. Waser N. M. 1983a. Competition for pollination and floral character differences among sympatric plant species: a review of evidence. - In: Jones C. E. and Little R. J. (eds), Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 277-293.
56. Waser N. M. 1983b. The adaptive nature of floral traits: ideas and evidence. - In: Real L. (ed), Pollination biology. Academic Press, pp. 241-285.
57. Waser N. M. 1986. Flower constancy: definition, cause and measurement. Am. Nat. 127: 593-603.
58. Waser N. M. and Fugate M. L. 1986. Pollen precedence and stigma closure: a mechanism of competition for pollination between Delphinium nelsonii and Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 70: 573-577.
59. Weigelt A. et al. 2007. Identifying mechanisms of competition in multi-species communities J. Ecol. 95: 53-64.