Pollinator visitation patterns strongly influence among-flower variation in selfing rate

Annals of Botany

Volumn 103, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1379-1383

  Karron, Jeffrey D ^a   Holmquist, Karsten G ^b   Flanagan, Rebecca J ^a   Mitchell, Randall J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

Autogamy; bee; Bombus fervidus; floral display; geitonogamy; mating system; Mimulus ringens; monkeyflower; paternity analysis; pollen carryover; pollinator visitation sequence; self fertilization

Indexed keywords

APOIDEA; BOMBUS (GENUS); BOMBUS FERVIDUS; MIMULUS (ANGIOSPERM); MIMULUS RINGENS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEE; FLOWER; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BEES; FLOWERS; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 67650754057     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp030     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barrett SCH. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossingselfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358: 991-1004.
2. Barrett SCH, Eckert CG. 1990. Variation and evolution of mating systems in seed plants. In: Kawano S ed. Biological approaches and evolutionary trends in plants. London: Academic Press, 229-254.
3. Barrett SCH, Harder LD, Cole WW. 1994. Effects of flower number and position on self-fertilization in experimental populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Functional Ecology 8: 526-535.
4. Bell JM, Karron JD, Mitchell RJ. 2005. Interspecific competition for pollination lowers seed production and outcrossing rate in Mimulus ringens. Ecology 86: 762-771.
5. Brunet J, Sweet HR. 2006. Impact of insect pollinator group and floral display size on outcrossing rate. Evolution 60: 234-246.
6. Carromero W, Hamrick JL. 2005. The mating system of Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae): the effect of plant height. International Journal of Plant Sciences 166: 979-983.
7. Castellanos MC, Wilson P, Thomson JD. 2003. Pollen transfer by hummingbirds and bumblebees and the divergence of pollination modes in Penstemon. Evolution 57: 2742-2752.
8. Cruzan MB. 1998. Genetic markers in plant evolutionary ecology. Ecology 79: 400-412.
9. Dudash MR, Ritland K. 1991. Multiple paternity and self-fertilization in relation to floral age in Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 1746-1753.
10. Epperson BK, Clegg MT. 1987. First-pollination primacy and pollen selection in the morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. Heredity 58: 5-14.
11. Farris MA, Mitton JB. 1984. Population density, outcrossing rate, and heterozygote superiority in ponderosa pine. Evolution 38: 1151-1154.
12. Flanagan RJ, Mitchell RJ, Knutowski D, Karron JD. 2009. Interspecific pollinator movements reduce pollen deposition and seed production in Mimulus ringens (Phrymaceae). American Journal of Botany 96: 809-815.
13. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 36: 47-79.
14. Goulson D, Stout JC, Hawson SA, Allen JA. 1998. Floral display size in comfrey, Symphytum officinale L. (Boraginaceae): relationships with visitation by three bumblebee species and subsequent seed set. Oecologia 113: 502-508.
15. Harder LD, Barrett SCH. 1995. Mating costs of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373: 512-514.
16. Harder LD, Barrett SCH. 1996. Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York: Chapman and Hall, 140-190.
17. Herlihy CR, Eckert CG. 2007. Evolutionary analysis of a key floral trait in Aquilegia canadensis (ranunculaceae): genetic variation in herkogamy and its effect on the mating system. Evolution 61: 1661-74.
18. Holmquist KG. 2005. The effect of floral display and pollinator behavior on pollen-mediated gene dispersal in Mimulus ringens. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
19. Holsinger KE. 1991. Mass-action models of plant mating systems: the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. American Naturalist 138: 606-622.
20. Humphreys MO, Gale JS. 1974. Variation in wild populations of Papaver dubium. VII. The mating system. Heredity 33: 33-42.
21. Ivey CT, Carr DE. 2005. Effects of herbivory and inbreeding on the pollinators and mating system of Mimulus guttatus (Phrymaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 1641-1649.
22. Karron JD, Thumser NN, Tucker R, Hessenauer AJ. 1995a. The influence of population density on outcrossing rates in Mimulus ringens. Heredity 75: 175-180.
23. Karron JD, Tucker R, Thumser NN, Reinartz JA. 1995b. Comparison of pollinator flight movements and gene dispersal patterns in Mimulus ringens. Heredity 75: 612-617.
24. Karron JD, Jackson RT, Thumser NN, Schlicht SL. 1997. Outcrossing rates of individual Mimulus ringens genets are correlated with anther-stigma separation. Heredity 79: 365-370.
25. Karron JD, Mitchell RJ, Holmquist KG, Bell JM, Funk B. 2004. The influence of floral display size on selfing rates in Mimulus ringens. Heredity 92: 242-248.
26. Karron JD, Mitchell RJ, Bell JM. 2006. Multiple pollinator visits to Mimulus ringens (Phrymaceae) flowers increase mate number and seed set within fruits. American Journal of Botany 93: 1306-1312.
27. Klinkhamer PGL, de Jong TJ, de Bruyn GL. 1989. Plant size and pollinator visitation in Cynoglossum officinale. Oikos 54: 201-204.
28. Koelewijn HP. 2004. Sibling competition, size variation and frequencydependent outcrossing advantage in Plantago coronopus. Evolutionary Ecology 18: 51-74.
29. Lloyd DG. 1992. Self-and cross-fertilization in plants II. The selection of selffertilization. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153: 370-380.
30. Medrano M, Herrera CM, Barrett SCH. 2005. Herkogamy and mating patterns in the self-compatible daffodil Narcissus longispathus. Annals of Botany 95: 1105-1111.
31. Mitchell RJ, Karron JD, Holmquist KG, Bell JM. 2004. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Functional Ecology 18: 116-124.
32. Mitchell RJ, Karron JD, Holmquist KG, Bell JM. 2005. Patterns of multiple paternity in fruits of Mimulus ringens (Phrymaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 885-890.
33. MorrisWF, PriceMV,Waser NM, Thomson JD, Thomson BA, Stratton DA. 1994. Systematic increase in pollen carryover and its consequences for outcrossing in plant populations. Oikos 71: 431-440.
34. Motten AF, Antonovics J. 1992. Determinants of outcrossing rate in a predominantly self-fertilizing weed, Datura stramonium (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 79: 419-427.
35. Rademaker MC, de Jong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL. 1997. Pollen dynamics of bumble-bee visitation on Echium vulgare. Functional Ecology 11: 554-563.
36. Ritland K. 1989. Correlated matings in the partial selfer Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 43: 848-859.
37. Robertson AW. 1992. The relationship between floral display size, pollen carryover and geitonogamy in Myosotis colensoi (Kirk) Macbride (Boraginaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 46: 333-349.
38. Robertson AW, Macnair MR. 1995. The effects of floral display size on pollinator service to individual flowers of Myosotis and Mimulus. Oikos 72: 106-114.
39. SAS Institute Inc. 2007. JMP User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
40. Schmitt J, Ehrhardt DW. 1990. Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and suppression in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 44: 269-278.
41. Smyth CA, Hamrick JL. 1984. Variation in estimates of outcrossing in musk thistle populations. Journal of Heredity 75: 303-307.
42. Snow AA, Spira TP, Simpson R, Klips RA. 1996. The ecology of geitonogamous pollination. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York: Chapman and Hall, 191-216.
43. Thomson JD. 1986. Pollen transport and deposition by bumble bees in Erythronium: influences of floral nectar and bee grooming. Journal of Ecology 74: 329-341.
44. Warwick SI, Thompson BK. 1989. The mating system in sympatric populations of Carduus nutans, Carduus acanthoides and their hybrid swarms. Heredity 63: 329-338.
45. Williams CF. 2007. Effects of floral display size and biparental inbreeding on outcrossing rates in Delphinium barbeyi (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany 94: 1696-1705.