Variation in pollinator preference between two Ipomopsis contact sites that differ in hybridization rate

Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 99-110

  Aldridge, George ^a   Campbell, Diane R ^a,b  

^a ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethological isolation; Geographic variation; Hummingbirds; Hybrid zones; Hyles lineata; Indirect effects on pollinator behavior; Ipomopsis; Pollinator preference

Indexed keywords

BIRD; DICOTYLEDON; ENTOMOPHILY; FLOWER VISITING; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; HYBRID ZONE; HYBRIDIZATION; MOTH; ORNITHOPHILY; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL; APPETITE; ARTICLE; BIRD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLOWER; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; HYBRIDIZATION; MOTH; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMALS; APPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; BIRDS; COLORADO; FLOWERS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MOTHS; POLLEN; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

HYLES LINEATA; IPOMOPSIS; IPOMOPSIS TENUITUBA; SPHINGIDAE; TROCHILIDAE;

EID: 33947216065     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00008.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aigner, P. A., and P. E. Scott. 2002. Use and pollination of a hawkmoth plant, Nicotiana attenuata, by migrant hummingbirds. Southwest Nat. 47:1-11.
2. Aldridge, G. 2005a. Variation in frequency of hybrids and spatial structure among Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) contact sites. New Phytol. 167:279-288.
3. -. 2005b. Comparing prezygotic isolating mechanisms in unimodal and bimodal plant hybrid zones. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine. Ivine, CA.
4. Aldridge, G., and D. R. Campbell. 2006. Asymmetrical pollen success in Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) contact sites. Am. J. Bot. 93:903-909.
5. Barton, N. H., and G. M. Hewitt. 1989. Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature 341:497-503.
6. Bateman, A. 1951. The taxonomic discrimination of bees. Heredity 5:271-278.
7. Bradshaw, H. D., and D. W. Schemske. 2003. Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 426:176-178.
8. Broyles, S. B. 2002. Hybrid bridges to gene flow: a case study in milkweeds (Asclepias). Evolution 56:1943-1953.
9. Campbell, D. R. 2003. Natural selection in Ipomopsis hybrid zones: implications for ecological speciation. New Phytol. 161:83-90.
10. Campbell, D. R., and G. Aldridge. 2006. Floral biology in hybrid zones. Pp.326-347 in S. C. H. Barrett and L. Harder eds. Ecology and evolution of flowers,. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
11. Campbell, D. R., and A. F. Motten. 1985. The mechanism of competition for pollination between two forest herbs. Ecology 66:554-563.
12. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, and E. J. Melendez-Ackerman. 1997. Analyzing pollinator-mediated selection in a plant hybrid zone: hummingbird visitation patterns on three spatial scales. Am. Nat. 149:295-315.
13. Campbell, D. R., and N. M. Waser. 2001. Genotype-by-environment interaction and the fitness of plant hybrids in the wild. Evolution 55:669-676.
14. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, and G. T. Pederson. 2002a. Predicting patterns of mating and potential hybridization from pollinator behavior. Am. Nat. 159:438-450.
15. Campbell, D. R., M. Crawford, A. K. Brody, and T. A. Forbis. 2002b. Resistance to pre-dispersal seed predators in a natural hybrid zone. Oecologia 131:436-443.
16. Castellanos, M. C., P. Wilson and J. D. Thomson. 2004. 'Anti-bee' and 'pro-bird' changes during the evolution of hummingbird pollination in Penstemon flowers. J. Evol. Biol. 17:876-885.
17. Chase, V. C., and P. H. Raven. 1975. Evolutionary and ecological relationships between Aquilegia formosa and A.pubescens (Ranunculaceae), two perennial plants. Evolution 29:474-486.
18. Chittka, L., J. D. Thomson, and N. M. Waser. 1999. Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86:361-377.
19. Cock, M. J. W. 1978. The assessment of preference. J. Anim. Ecol. 47:805-816.
20. Elam, D. R., and Y. B. Linhart. 1988. Pollination and seed production in Ipomopsis aggregata: differences among and within flower color morphs. Am. J. Bot. 75:1262-1274.
21. Emms, S. K., and M. K. Arnold. 2000. Site-to-site differences in pollinator visitation patterns in a Louisiana iris hybrid zone. Oikos 91:668-678.
22. Fenster, C. B., and M. R. Dudash. 2001. Spatiotemporal variation in the role of hummingbirds as pollinators of Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). Ecology 82:844-851.
23. Fenster, C. B., W. S. Armbruster, P. Wilson, M. R. Dudash, and J. D. Thomson. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 35:375-403.
24. Fulton, M., and S. A. Hodges. 1999. Floral isolation between Aquilegia Formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Proc. Royal Soc. 266:2247-2252.
25. Grant, V. 1949. Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms. Evolution 3:82-97.
26. -. 1992. Floral isolation between ornithophilous and sphingophilous species of Ipomopsis and Aquilegia. Ecology 89:11828-11831.
27. -. 1993a. Origin of floral isolation between ornithophilous and sphingolphilous plant species. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 90:7729-7733.
28. -. 1993b. Effects of hybridization and selection on floral isolation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 90:990-993.
29. Grant, V., and K. Grant. 1965. Flower Pollination in the Phlox Family. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
30. -. 1983. Hawkmoth pollination in Mirabilis longiflora (Nyctaginaceae). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 80:1298-1299.
31. Grant, V., and E. J. Temeles. 1992. Foraging ability of rufous hummingbirds on hummingbird flowers and hawkmoth flowers. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 89:9400-9404.
32. Grant V., and D. H. Wilken. 1988. Natural hybridization between Ipomopsis aggregata and Ipomopsis tenuituba (Polemoniaceae). Botanical Gazette. 149:213-221.
33. Harrison, R. G. 1986. Pattern and process in a narrow hybrid zone. Heredity 56:337-349.
34. Hewitt, G. M. 1988. Hybrid zones - Natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3:158-167.
35. Heinrich, B., and P. H. Raven. 1972. Energetics and pollination ecology. Science 176:597-602.
36. Husband, B. C., and H. A. Sabara. 2003. Reproductive isolation between tetraploids and their diploid progenitors in fireweed, Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). New Phytol. 161:703-713.
37. 1 hybrids. Evolution 58:2634-2644.
38. Jiggins, C. D., and J. Mallett. 2000. Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:250-255.
39. Kelber, A., A. Balkenius, and E. J. Warrant. 2003. Colour vision in diurnal and nocturnal hawkmoths. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43:571-579.
40. Melendez-Ackerman, E. J., and D. R. Campbell. 1998. Adaptive significance of flower color and inter-trait correlations in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Evolution 52:1293-1303.
41. Melendez-Ackerman, E. J., D. R. Campbell, and N. M. Waser. 1997. Hummingbird behavior and mechanisms of selection on flower color in Ipomopsis. Ecology 78:2532-2541.
42. Moeller, D. A. 2005. Pollinator community structure and sources of spatial variation in plant-pollinator interactions in Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana. Oecologia 142:28-37.
43. Nilsson, L. A. 1983. Processes of isolation and introgressive interplay between Platanthera bifolia (L) Rich and P.chlorantha (Custer) Reichb. (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 87:325-350.
44. Paige, K. N., and T. G. Whitham. 1985. Individual and population shifts in flower color by Scarlet Gilia - a mechanism for pollinator tracking. Science 227:315-317.
45. Price, M. V., N. M. Waser, R. E. Irwin, D. R. Campbell, and A. K. Brody. 2005. Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study. Ecology 86: 2106-2116.
46. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
47. Pyke, G. H. 1981. Optimal foraging in hummingbirds: rule of movement between inflorescences. Animal Behav. 29:889-896.
48. Ramsey, J., H. D. Bradshaw, and D. W. Schemske. 2003. Components of reproductive isolation between the Monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57:1520-1534.
49. Silva-Montellano, A., and L. E. Eguiarte. 2003. Geographic patterns in the reproductive ecology of Agave lechuguilla (Agavaceae) in the Chihuahuan desert. I. Floral characteristics, visitors, and fecundity. Am. J. Bot. 90:377-387.
50. Straw, R. M. 1956. Floral isolation in Penstemon. Am. Nat. 90:47-53.
51. Suzuki, K. 1984. Pollination system and its significance on isolation and hybridization in Japanese Epimedium (Berberidaceae). Bot. Mag. Tokyo 97:381-396.
52. Thomson, J. D., and B. Thomson. 1992. Pollen presentation and viability schedules in animal-pollinated plants: consequences for reproductive success. Pp. 1-24 in R. Wyatt, ed. Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction. Chapman Hall, New York.
53. Waser, N. M. 1986. Flower constancy: definition, cause, and measurement. Am. Nat. 127:593-603.
54. -. 1998. Pollination, angiosperm speciation, and the nature of species boundaries. Oikos 82:198-201.
55. Waser, N. M., and D. R. Campbell. 2004. Ecological speciation in flowering plants. Pp. 264-277 in U. Dieckmann, H. Metz, M. Doebeli, and D. Tautz, eds. Adaptive speciation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
56. Watano, Y., A. Kanai, and N. Tani. 2004. Genetic structure of hybrid zones between Pinus pumila and P. parviflora var. pentaphylla (Pinaceae) revealed by molecular hybrid index analysis. Am. J. Bot. 91:65-72.
57. Wesselingh, R. A., and M. L. Arnold. 2000. Pollinator behaviour and the evolution of Louisiana iris hybrid zones. J. Evol. Biol. 13:171-180.
58. Williams, J. H., W. J. Boecklen, and D. J. Howard. 2001. Reproductive processes in two oak (Quercus) contact zones with different levels of hybridization. Heredity 87:680-690.
59. Wilson, P., M. C. Castellanos, J. N. Hogue, J. D. Thomson, and S. W. Armbruster. 2004. A multivariate search for pollination syndromes among penstemons. Oikos 104:345-361.
60. Wolf, P. G., D. R. Campbell, N. M. Waser, S. D. Sipes, T. R. Toler, and J. K. Archibald. 2001. Tests of pre- and post-pollination barriers to hybridization between sympatric species of Ipomopsis. Am. J. Bot. 88:213-219.
61. Wu, C. A., and D. R. Campbell. 2005. Cytoplasmic and nuclear markers reveal contrasting patterns of spatial and genetic structure in a natural Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Mol. Ecol. 14:781-792.