Effect of introduced Euphorbia esula on the pollination of Viola pedatifida

Botany

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 283-292

  Montgomery, B R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breeding system; Cleistogamy; Competition for pollination; Euphorbia esula; Interspecific pollen transfer; Viola

Indexed keywords

CONSPECIFIC; DICOTYLEDON; FECUNDITY; FLOWER; FRUIT SET; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEED SET;

EUPHORBIA; EUPHORBIA ESULA; EUPHORBIACEAE; VIOLA PEDATIFIDA; VIOLACEAE;

EID: 65349196746     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B08-139     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Armbruster, W.S., and McGuire, A.D. 1991. Experimental assessment of reproductive interactions between sympatric Aster and Erigeron (Asteraceae) in interior Alaska. Am. J. Bot. 78(10): 1449-1457. doi:10.2307/2445283.
2. Ashman, T.L., Knight, T.M., Steets, J.A., Amarasekare, P., Burd, M., Campbell, D.R., Dudash, M.R., Johnston, M.O., Mazer, S.J., Mitchell, R.J., Morgan, M.T., and Wilson, W.G. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology, 85(9): 2408-2421. doi:10. 1890/03-8024.
3. Beattie, A.J. 1969. Studies in the pollination ecology of Viola. I. The pollen-content of stigmatic cavities. Watsonia, 7(3): 142- 156.
4. Beattie, A.J. 1971a. Pollination mechanisms in Viola. New Phytol. 70(2): 343-360. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1971.tb02533.x.
5. Beattie, A.J. 1971b. A technique for the study of insect-borne pollen. Pan-Pac. Entomol. 47: 82.
6. Beattie, A.J. 1974. Floral evolution in Viola. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 61: 781-793. doi:10.2307/2395029.
7. Belcher, J.W., and Wilson, S.D. 1989. Leafy spurge and the species composition of a mixed-grass prairie. J. Range Manage. 42(2): 172-175. doi:10.2307/3899318.
8. Bell, J.M., Karron, J.D., and Mitchell, R.J. 2005. Interspecific competition for pollination lowers seed production and outcrossing in Mimulus ringens. Ecology, 86(3): 762-771. doi:10.1890/04-0694.
9. Berg, H. 2003. Factors influencing seed: Ovule ratios and reproductive success in four cleistogamous species: A comparison between two flower types. Plant Biol. 5(2): 194-202. doi:10.1055/ s-2003-40727.
10. Brown, B.J., and Mitchell, R.J. 2001. Competition for pollination: effects of pollen of an invasive plant on seed set of a native congener. Oecologia (Berl.), 129(1): 43-49. doi:10.1007/ s004420100700.
11. Brown, B.J., Mitchell, R.J., and Graham, S.A. 2002. Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology, 83(8): 2328-2336.
12. Burd, M. 1994. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot. Rev. 60: 83- 139. doi:10.1007/BF02856594.
13. Butler, J.L., and Cogan, D.R. 2004. Leafy spurge effects on patterns of plant species richness. J. Range Manage. 57(3): 305- 311. doi:10.2307/4003800.
14. Campbell, D.R., and Motten, A.F. 1985. The mechanism of competition for pollination between two forest herbs. Ecology, 66(2): 554-563. doi:10.2307/1940404.
15. Caruso, C.M., and Alfaro, M. 2000. Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: effect of Castilleja linariaefolia pollen on seed set of Ipomopsis aggregata. Can. J. Bot. 78: 600-606. doi:10.1139/cjb-78-5-600.
16. Chittka, L., and Schürkens, S. 2001. Successful invasion of a floral market. Nature (London), 411: 653. doi:10.1038/35079676. PMID:11395755.
17. Christiansen, P., and Muller, M.S. 1999. An illustrated guide to Iowa prairie plants. Iowa City Press, Iowa City, Iowa.
18. Culley, T.M. 2000. Inbreeding depression and floral type fitness differences in Viola canadensis (Violaceae), a species with chas-mogamous and cleistogamous flowers. Can. J. Bot. 78(11): 1420-1429. doi:10.1139/cjb-78-11-1420.
19. Culley, T.M. 2002. Reproductive biology and delayed selfing in Viola pubescens (Violaceae), an understory herb with chasmoga-mous and cleistogamous flowers. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163(1): 113- 122. doi:10.1086/324180.
20. Feldman, T.S., Morris, W.F., and Wilson, W.G. 2004. When can two plant species facilitate each other's pollination? Oikos, 105(1): 197-207. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12845.x.
21. Fishman, L., and Wyatt, R. 1999. Pollinator-mediated competition, reproductive character displacement, and the evolution of selfing in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution, 53(6): 1723- 1733. doi:10.2307/2640435.
22. Freitas, L., and Sazima, M. 2003. Floral biology and pollination mechanisms in two Viola species-from nectar to pollen flowers? Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 91(3): 311-317. doi:10.1093/aob/mcg025. PMID:12547683.
23. Galen, C., and Gregory, T. 1989. Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: consequences of foreign pollen contamination for seed set in the alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia (Berl.), 81: 120-123. doi:10.1007/ BF00377020.
24. Ghazoul, J. 2004. Alien abduction: Disruption of native plant-pollinator interactions by invasive species. Biotropica, 36(2): 156- 164.
25. Hansen, T.F., Armbruster, W.S., and Antonsen, L. 2000. Comparative analysis of character displacement and spatial adaptations as illustrated by the evolution of Dalechampia blossoms. Am. Nat. 156: S17-S34. doi:10.1086/303413.
26. Huerd, S.C., and Taylor, S.E. 1998. Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) spread in Iowa. J. Iowa Acad. Sci. 105(1): 27-29.
27. Ishii, R., and Higashi, M. 2001. Coexistence induced by pollen limitation in flowering-plant species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol Sci. 268(1467): 579-585. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1410.
28. Kanchan, S., and Chandra, J. 1980. Pollen allelopathy - a new phenomenon. New Phytol. 84(4): 739-746. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04786.x.
29. Kearns, C.A., and Inouye, D.W. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, Colo.
30. Knuth, P. 1908. Handbook of flower pollination. Clarendon press, Oxford, UK.
31. Kwak, M.M., and Jennersten, O. 1991. Bumblebee visitation and seedset in Melampyrum pratense and Viscaria vulgaris - het-erospecific pollen and pollen limitation. Oecologia (Berl.), 86(1): 99-104. doi:10.1007/ BF00317395.
32. Larson, D.L., Royer, R.A., and Royer, M.R. 2006. Insect visitation and pollen deposition in an invaded prairie plant community. Biol. Conserv. 130: 148-159. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.009.
33. Levin, D.A. 1972. Pollen exchange as a function of species proximity in Phlox. Evolution, 26(2): 251-258. doi:10.2307/2407035.
34. Levin, D.A., and Anderson, W.W. 1970. Competition for pollinators between simultaneously flowering species. Am. Nat. 104(939): 455-467. doi:10.1086/282680.
35. Levin, D.A., and Kerster, H. 1969. The dependence of bee-mediated pollen and gene dispersal upon plant density. Evolution, 23: 560-571. doi:10.2307/2406853.
36. Lord, E.M. 1981. Cleistogamy - a tool for the study of floral morphogenesis, function and evolution. Bot. Rev. 47(4): 421-449. doi:10.1007/BF02860538.
37. Messersmith, C.G., Lym, R.G., and Galitz, D.S. 1985. Biology of leafy spurge. In Leafy Spurge. Edited by A.K. Watson. Weed Science Society of America. pp. 42-56.
38. Moeller, D.A. 2004. Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology, 85(12): 3289-3301. doi:10.1890/ 03-0810.
39. Montgomery, B.R. 2007. Patterns and consequences of competition for pollination between introduced and native species with dif- ferent floral traits. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
40. Motten, A.F. 1982. Autogamy and competition for pollinators in Hepatica americana (Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Bot. 69: 1296- 1305. doi:10.2307/2442754.
41. Murphy, S.D. 2000. Field testing for pollen allelopathy - a review. J. Chem. Ecol. 26(9): 2155-2172. doi:10.1023/ A:1005572516948.
42. Murphy, S.D. 2002. Biochemical and physiological aspects of pollen allelopathy. In Chemical ecology of plants: Allelopathy in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Edited by I. Mallik and A.U. Mallik. Birkhäuser Verlag, Switzerland. pp. 245-260.
43. Murphy, S.D., and Aarssen, L.W. 1995. Reduced seed set in Elytrigia repens caused by allelopathic pollen from Phleum pratense. Can. J. Bot. 73(9): 1417-1422.
44. Murphy, S.D., and Aarssen, L.W. 1996. Cleistogamy limits reduction in seed set in Danthonia compressa (Poaceae) caused by al-lelopathic pollen from Phleum pratense (Poaceae). Ecoscience, 3(2): 205-210.
45. Olson, B.E., and Wallander, R.T. 2002. Effects of invasive forb litter on seed germination, seedling growth and survival. Basic Appl. Ecol. 3(4): 309-317. doi:10.1078/1439-1791-00127.
46. Randall, J.L., and Hilu, K.W. 1990. Interference through improper pollen transfer in mixed stands of Impatiens capensis and I. pal-lida (Balsaminaceae). Am. J. Bot. 77(7): 939-944. doi:10.2307/ 2444509.
47. Rathcke, B. 1983. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. In Pollination biology. Edited by L. Real. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, Fla. pp. 305-329.
48. Redbo-Torstensson, P., and Berg, H. 1995. Seasonal cleistogamy - a conditional strategy to provide reproductive assurance. Acta Bot. Neerl. 44(3): 247-256.
49. Selleck, G.W., Frankton, C., and Coupland, R.T. 1962. Leafy spurge in Saskatchewan. Ecol. Monogr. 32(1): 1-29. doi:10. 2307/1942359.
50. Steenhagen, D.A., and Zimdahl, R.L. 1979. Allelopathy of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Sci. 27(1): 1-3.
51. Valentine, D.H. 1962. Variation and evolution in the genus Viola. Preslia, 34: 190-206.
52. Waser, N.M. 1978. Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology, 59(5): 934-944. doi:10.2307/1938545.
53. Waser, N.M. 1982. A comparison of distances flown by different visitors to flowers of the same species. Oecologia (Berl.), 55(2): 251-257. doi:10.1007/BF00384496.
54. Waser, N.M. 1983. Competition for pollination and floral character difference among sympatric plant species: a review of the evidence. In Handbook of experimental pollination Ecology. Edited by C.E. Jones and R.J. Little. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, N.Y. pp. 277-293.
55. Waser, N.M., and Fugate, M.L. 1986. Pollen precedence and stigma closure - a mechanism of competition for pollination between Delphinium nelsonii and Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecolo-gia (Berl.), 70(4): 573-577. doi:10.1007/BF00379906.
56. Watson, A.K. 1985. Introduction - The leafy spurge problem. In Leafy Spurge. Monograph Series of the Weed Science Society of America, No. 3. Edited by A.K. Watson. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, III. pp. 1-7.